Cafer Ozgur Hancerli , Ada Ozcecelik , Ergun Bozdag , Abdulhamit Misir
{"title":"Threaded K-wire vs cortical screw fixation in O’Driscoll type 2 and 3 coronoid fractures: a comparative biomechanical study","authors":"Cafer Ozgur Hancerli , Ada Ozcecelik , Ergun Bozdag , Abdulhamit Misir","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coronoid fractures significantly impact elbow stability, yet limited biomechanical data exists comparing fixation methods for different fracture types. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical performance of threaded K-wire versus cortical screw fixation in O'Driscoll type 2 and 3 coronoid fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-eight synthetic ulnar bones were divided into four groups (<em>n</em> = 7 each): Type 2 with K-wire fixation, Type 2 with screw fixation, Type 3 with K-wire fixation, and Type 3 with screw fixation. Fractures were created, reduced, and fixed under fluoroscopic guidance. Specimens underwent biomechanical testing using a custom-made apparatus to evaluate load to failure (N), displacement (mm), and stiffness (N/mm). Two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's tests were used for statistical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Type 2 fractures with screw fixation demonstrated the highest load to failure (1392.59 ± 76.77 N), followed by Type 2 with K-wire fixation (1155.00 ± 200.81 N), Type 3 with K-wire fixation (1093.65 ± 248.68 N), and Type 3 with screw fixation (1058.54 ± 320.46 N), though differences were not statistically significant (<em>p</em> = 0.086). For stiffness, Type 2 fracture fixation fractures exhibited significantly higher values (∼256 N/mm) compared to Type 3 fractures (∼160 N/mm) regardless of fixation method (<em>p</em> = 0.002, Cohen's <em>d</em> = 1.55). The fixation method itself (K-wire vs. screw) did not significantly affect any biomechanical parameter (<em>p</em> > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>O'Driscoll Type 2 fracture fixation provide superior biomechanical stability compared to Type 3 fractures, primarily through enhanced stiffness. While Type 2 screw fixation demonstrated the highest load to failure values, K-wire fixation in Type 2 fractures offered comparable stiffness. These findings suggest that fracture type has a more profound impact on mechanical performance than the choice between K-wire and screw fixation, giving surgeons flexibility in fixation choice for Type 2 fractures while maintaining adequate stability for early rehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 11","pages":"Article 112717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005753","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Coronoid fractures significantly impact elbow stability, yet limited biomechanical data exists comparing fixation methods for different fracture types. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical performance of threaded K-wire versus cortical screw fixation in O'Driscoll type 2 and 3 coronoid fractures.
Methods
Twenty-eight synthetic ulnar bones were divided into four groups (n = 7 each): Type 2 with K-wire fixation, Type 2 with screw fixation, Type 3 with K-wire fixation, and Type 3 with screw fixation. Fractures were created, reduced, and fixed under fluoroscopic guidance. Specimens underwent biomechanical testing using a custom-made apparatus to evaluate load to failure (N), displacement (mm), and stiffness (N/mm). Two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's tests were used for statistical analysis.
Results
Type 2 fractures with screw fixation demonstrated the highest load to failure (1392.59 ± 76.77 N), followed by Type 2 with K-wire fixation (1155.00 ± 200.81 N), Type 3 with K-wire fixation (1093.65 ± 248.68 N), and Type 3 with screw fixation (1058.54 ± 320.46 N), though differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.086). For stiffness, Type 2 fracture fixation fractures exhibited significantly higher values (∼256 N/mm) compared to Type 3 fractures (∼160 N/mm) regardless of fixation method (p = 0.002, Cohen's d = 1.55). The fixation method itself (K-wire vs. screw) did not significantly affect any biomechanical parameter (p > 0.05).
Conclusion
O'Driscoll Type 2 fracture fixation provide superior biomechanical stability compared to Type 3 fractures, primarily through enhanced stiffness. While Type 2 screw fixation demonstrated the highest load to failure values, K-wire fixation in Type 2 fractures offered comparable stiffness. These findings suggest that fracture type has a more profound impact on mechanical performance than the choice between K-wire and screw fixation, giving surgeons flexibility in fixation choice for Type 2 fractures while maintaining adequate stability for early rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.