{"title":"A meta-analytic investigation of digital transformation: Antecedents, consequences, and contingencies","authors":"Qin Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital transformation (DT) has become a strategic imperative for enterprises to drive innovation and sustain competitiveness in the digital economy. Despite the vast literature on DT, the empirical findings remain mixed and inconsistent, leading to a lack of consensus regarding the relationships between DT and its factors and outcomes. This study proposes an integrated theoretical framework and conducts a <em>meta</em>-analysis of 74 primary studies, in order to clarify the links of DT with its antecedents and consequences and determine their boundary conditions. The results confirm the significant positive associations of DT with technology-organization-environment (TOE) factors as well as competency and performance outcomes. Particularly, DT is more susceptible to digital technology usage and dynamic capabilities, whereas it exerts greater influence on enterprise resilience and supply chain performance. Furthermore, measurement method, industry type, and national economy function as contingencies that moderate these linkages, with stronger effects observed in subjective measurement, manufacturing industry, and advanced economy. This study resolves the inconsistency and yields a conclusive takeaway on the above relationships, which provides new insights into the DT field and important implications for practitioners and policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 115643"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004667","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Digital transformation (DT) has become a strategic imperative for enterprises to drive innovation and sustain competitiveness in the digital economy. Despite the vast literature on DT, the empirical findings remain mixed and inconsistent, leading to a lack of consensus regarding the relationships between DT and its factors and outcomes. This study proposes an integrated theoretical framework and conducts a meta-analysis of 74 primary studies, in order to clarify the links of DT with its antecedents and consequences and determine their boundary conditions. The results confirm the significant positive associations of DT with technology-organization-environment (TOE) factors as well as competency and performance outcomes. Particularly, DT is more susceptible to digital technology usage and dynamic capabilities, whereas it exerts greater influence on enterprise resilience and supply chain performance. Furthermore, measurement method, industry type, and national economy function as contingencies that moderate these linkages, with stronger effects observed in subjective measurement, manufacturing industry, and advanced economy. This study resolves the inconsistency and yields a conclusive takeaway on the above relationships, which provides new insights into the DT field and important implications for practitioners and policymakers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.