{"title":"Does information exposure approximate information choice? An experiment on honey fraud information and valuation","authors":"Christopher R. Gustafson , Antoine Champetier","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We conducted a novel incentivized valuation experiment to study the implications of information exposure on consumer valuation and compare them to an approximation of real-world conditions in which people select information to view in an information-rich environment. Studies on the impact of information on consumer valuation typically direct participants to read researcher-provided information, but evidence from comparable studies of decisions in laboratory versus field settings suggests this approach may overestimate the real-world impact—that is, the external validity—of information when people must choose among many sources of information. We study the implications of information exposure vs. information choice by randomizing participants to one of those two conditions in a controlled valuation experiment based on the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism, addressing three aims. First, we estimate the difference in valuation of honey when individuals are exposed to information vs. when they can choose to access information. Next, we examine potential drivers of information search when individuals can choose to access information. Finally, we study the effects of exposure to information on subsequent information access. The research offers multiple contributions, including—most significantly—evidence that valuation changes in response to information does not reflect what happens when people can make choices about information access, which is critical for providing accurate estimates to researchers, policymakers, and other stakeholders. It also contributes to our understanding of individuals' selection of information, identifying drivers of information choice. Finally, it provides estimates of the impact of information about honey fraud on consumers' valuation of honey. Honey fraud and its impact on honey revenues is a key issue for the beekeeping industry and an important determinant of the number of hives contributing to crop pollination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 105682"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002575","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We conducted a novel incentivized valuation experiment to study the implications of information exposure on consumer valuation and compare them to an approximation of real-world conditions in which people select information to view in an information-rich environment. Studies on the impact of information on consumer valuation typically direct participants to read researcher-provided information, but evidence from comparable studies of decisions in laboratory versus field settings suggests this approach may overestimate the real-world impact—that is, the external validity—of information when people must choose among many sources of information. We study the implications of information exposure vs. information choice by randomizing participants to one of those two conditions in a controlled valuation experiment based on the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism, addressing three aims. First, we estimate the difference in valuation of honey when individuals are exposed to information vs. when they can choose to access information. Next, we examine potential drivers of information search when individuals can choose to access information. Finally, we study the effects of exposure to information on subsequent information access. The research offers multiple contributions, including—most significantly—evidence that valuation changes in response to information does not reflect what happens when people can make choices about information access, which is critical for providing accurate estimates to researchers, policymakers, and other stakeholders. It also contributes to our understanding of individuals' selection of information, identifying drivers of information choice. Finally, it provides estimates of the impact of information about honey fraud on consumers' valuation of honey. Honey fraud and its impact on honey revenues is a key issue for the beekeeping industry and an important determinant of the number of hives contributing to crop pollination.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.