Francesco Branda , Massimo Ciccozzi , Fabio Scarpa
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in scientific research: Challenges, opportunities and the imperative of a human-centric synergy","authors":"Francesco Branda , Massimo Ciccozzi , Fabio Scarpa","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This work offers a critical and evidence-based synthesis of the conceptual, methodological, and social implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research, significantly enriched by an informetric perspective. The analysis transcends descriptive overviews and simple cataloging of products, providing a deeper understanding of the opportunities AI presents, such as accelerated data analysis, hypothesis generation, and drug discovery. At the same time, crucial challenges that AI introduces are explored, including knowledge monocultures, algorithmic bias, reproducibility issues, and the impact on research integrity and evaluation. The original contribution of this paper lies in the integration of informetric analysis to quantify the influence of AI on the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge, highlighting both its potential as an analytical tool and the risk of bias in the academic record. The paper emphasizes the need for frameworks that harmonize technological capabilities with the irreplaceable ingenuity of human thought, promoting balanced collaboration between AI and researchers, where AI serves as a tool to increase productivity and human oversight ensures ethical rigor, critical evaluation, and creative exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 4","pages":"Article 101727"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informetrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157725000896","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This work offers a critical and evidence-based synthesis of the conceptual, methodological, and social implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research, significantly enriched by an informetric perspective. The analysis transcends descriptive overviews and simple cataloging of products, providing a deeper understanding of the opportunities AI presents, such as accelerated data analysis, hypothesis generation, and drug discovery. At the same time, crucial challenges that AI introduces are explored, including knowledge monocultures, algorithmic bias, reproducibility issues, and the impact on research integrity and evaluation. The original contribution of this paper lies in the integration of informetric analysis to quantify the influence of AI on the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge, highlighting both its potential as an analytical tool and the risk of bias in the academic record. The paper emphasizes the need for frameworks that harmonize technological capabilities with the irreplaceable ingenuity of human thought, promoting balanced collaboration between AI and researchers, where AI serves as a tool to increase productivity and human oversight ensures ethical rigor, critical evaluation, and creative exploration.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Informetrics (JOI) publishes rigorous high-quality research on quantitative aspects of information science. The main focus of the journal is on topics in bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics, patentometrics, altmetrics and research evaluation. Contributions studying informetric problems using methods from other quantitative fields, such as mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics and econometrics, and network science, are especially encouraged. JOI publishes both theoretical and empirical work. In general, case studies, for instance a bibliometric analysis focusing on a specific research field or a specific country, are not considered suitable for publication in JOI, unless they contain innovative methodological elements.