Exploring the Trade‐Offs and Synergies Among Agricultural Land Use Benefits and Their Principal Influencing Factors: Implications for Sustainable Agricultural Development

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Zhaojun Wang, Ying Wang, Haiyang Li, Xiuyu Huang
{"title":"Exploring the Trade‐Offs and Synergies Among Agricultural Land Use Benefits and Their Principal Influencing Factors: Implications for Sustainable Agricultural Development","authors":"Zhaojun Wang, Ying Wang, Haiyang Li, Xiuyu Huang","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural land plays a pivotal role in safeguarding food security and improving farmers' living standards. However, its utilization faces sustainability challenges due to greenhouse gas emissions and associated environmental impacts. Improving agricultural land use benefits (ALUB) has become imperative for achieving sustainable agricultural development. This study combines the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with agricultural land systems to construct a novel “element‐structure–function‐benefit‐interaction” theoretical model for understanding ALUB. Methodologically, using county‐level data (2000–2020) from Hubei Province, we first quantified the ALUB indices for 75 counties through the evaluation index system. Then, we analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution patterns of trade‐off and synergy relationships among ALUB dimensions via a Mechanical Equilibrium Model. Finally, we identified key influencing factors using the Optimal Parameters Geographical Detector. Results show: (1) Economic, social, and comprehensive benefits showed fluctuating growth, whereas ecological benefits remained relatively stable; (2) The 2020 average coordination level (0.378) indicated basic coordination, with stable non‐high‐coordination spatial patterns; (3) Socioeconomic factors (e.g., GDP density, rural labor force) predominantly influenced trade‐off/synergy relationships. Through deviation distribution analysis, the counties were categorized into three distinct typologies: excellent ecological benefits but weak economic and poor social benefits (Quadrant I), excellent economic benefits but weak ecological and poor social benefits (Quadrant II), and excellent ecological benefits but weak social and poor economic benefits (Quadrant VI). Based on these classifications, tailored optimization strategies were proposed to enhance coordination among ALUB dimensions. This study not only enriches the conceptual framework of ALUB formation and its interrelationships but also provides practical guidance for sustainable agricultural land management.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural land plays a pivotal role in safeguarding food security and improving farmers' living standards. However, its utilization faces sustainability challenges due to greenhouse gas emissions and associated environmental impacts. Improving agricultural land use benefits (ALUB) has become imperative for achieving sustainable agricultural development. This study combines the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with agricultural land systems to construct a novel “element‐structure–function‐benefit‐interaction” theoretical model for understanding ALUB. Methodologically, using county‐level data (2000–2020) from Hubei Province, we first quantified the ALUB indices for 75 counties through the evaluation index system. Then, we analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution patterns of trade‐off and synergy relationships among ALUB dimensions via a Mechanical Equilibrium Model. Finally, we identified key influencing factors using the Optimal Parameters Geographical Detector. Results show: (1) Economic, social, and comprehensive benefits showed fluctuating growth, whereas ecological benefits remained relatively stable; (2) The 2020 average coordination level (0.378) indicated basic coordination, with stable non‐high‐coordination spatial patterns; (3) Socioeconomic factors (e.g., GDP density, rural labor force) predominantly influenced trade‐off/synergy relationships. Through deviation distribution analysis, the counties were categorized into three distinct typologies: excellent ecological benefits but weak economic and poor social benefits (Quadrant I), excellent economic benefits but weak ecological and poor social benefits (Quadrant II), and excellent ecological benefits but weak social and poor economic benefits (Quadrant VI). Based on these classifications, tailored optimization strategies were proposed to enhance coordination among ALUB dimensions. This study not only enriches the conceptual framework of ALUB formation and its interrelationships but also provides practical guidance for sustainable agricultural land management.
农业土地利用效益的权衡与协同效应及其主要影响因素探讨:对农业可持续发展的启示
农业用地在保障粮食安全和提高农民生活水平方面发挥着举足轻重的作用。然而,由于温室气体排放和相关的环境影响,其利用面临可持续性挑战。提高农业用地效益是实现农业可持续发展的必然要求。本研究将可持续发展目标(SDGs)与农业用地系统相结合,构建了一个全新的“要素-结构-功能-效益-相互作用”理论模型来理解农业土地利用。方法上,利用湖北省2000-2020年县域数据,通过评价指标体系对75个县域的ALUB指标进行量化。然后,通过力学平衡模型分析了ALUB各维度间权衡与协同关系的时空演化模式。最后,利用最优参数地理检测器识别关键影响因素。结果表明:(1)经济效益、社会效益和综合效益呈现波动增长,生态效益保持相对稳定;(2) 2020年平均协调水平(0.378)表现为基本协调,具有稳定的非高协调空间格局;(3)社会经济因素(如GDP密度、农村劳动力)主要影响贸易/协同关系。通过偏差分布分析,将县域划分为生态效益优良、经济效益弱、社会效益差(象限I)、经济效益优良、生态效益弱、社会效益差(象限II)、生态效益优良、社会效益弱、经济效益差(象限VI)三种不同类型。在此基础上,提出了针对性的优化策略,以增强ALUB各维度之间的协调性。该研究不仅丰富了ALUB形成及其相互关系的概念框架,而且为农业土地可持续管理提供了实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信