Mohammed Zain Ulabedin Adhoni, Ethan Pooley, Kevin Byrnes, Lazaros Tzelves, Patrick Juliebø‐Jones, Vineet Gauhar, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Oliver Traxer, Bhaskar Somani
{"title":"Suction in mini‐percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta‐analysis from the European Association of Urology Section of Endourology","authors":"Mohammed Zain Ulabedin Adhoni, Ethan Pooley, Kevin Byrnes, Lazaros Tzelves, Patrick Juliebø‐Jones, Vineet Gauhar, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Oliver Traxer, Bhaskar Somani","doi":"10.1111/bju.16891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo conduct a meta‐analysis comparing the outcomes of vacuum‐assisted access sheath (VAAS) mini‐percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) vs conventional access sheath (CAS) mPCNL.MethodsA systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with registration in PROSPERO (CRD42024619780). A comprehensive search identified comparative studies (randomised controlled trials and observational studies). The primary outcomes included operating time, stone‐free rate (SFR) and complications. Secondary outcomes included transfusion rates, haemoglobin deficit, and length of hospital stay. Data were analysed using Review Manager V5.4, with quality of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.ResultsFourteen studies with 2510 patients (1298 in the VAAS and 1212 in the CAS mPCNL groups) were included. VAAS mPCNL significantly reduced operating time, by 17.45 (13.12–21.79) min (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.001), and was associated with a higher SFR: odds ratio (OR) 1.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57, 2.35; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.001). The VAAS mPCNL group also had a lower postoperative fever rate (OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.35, 0.61]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.001) and a lower sepsis rate (OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.22, 0.93]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.03). The overall complication rate for VAAS mPCNL was significantly lower than for CAS mPCNL (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.001), with fewer minor complications. Hospital stay was shorter for VAAS mPCNL (mean reduction of 0.79 days; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.03). There were no significant differences in transfusion rates (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.46, 1.31]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.3) or haemoglobin deficit (0.00 g/dL [95% CI 0.22–0.22]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> > 0.9).ConclusionThe use of VAAS mPCNL offers significant advantages over CAS mPCNL, including shorter operating time, improved stone clearance, and reduced complications. These findings support the use of VAAS mPCNL in managing kidney stones, with further high‐quality studies recommended.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveTo conduct a meta‐analysis comparing the outcomes of vacuum‐assisted access sheath (VAAS) mini‐percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) vs conventional access sheath (CAS) mPCNL.MethodsA systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with registration in PROSPERO (CRD42024619780). A comprehensive search identified comparative studies (randomised controlled trials and observational studies). The primary outcomes included operating time, stone‐free rate (SFR) and complications. Secondary outcomes included transfusion rates, haemoglobin deficit, and length of hospital stay. Data were analysed using Review Manager V5.4, with quality of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.ResultsFourteen studies with 2510 patients (1298 in the VAAS and 1212 in the CAS mPCNL groups) were included. VAAS mPCNL significantly reduced operating time, by 17.45 (13.12–21.79) min (P < 0.001), and was associated with a higher SFR: odds ratio (OR) 1.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57, 2.35; P < 0.001). The VAAS mPCNL group also had a lower postoperative fever rate (OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.35, 0.61]; P < 0.001) and a lower sepsis rate (OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.22, 0.93]; P = 0.03). The overall complication rate for VAAS mPCNL was significantly lower than for CAS mPCNL (P < 0.001), with fewer minor complications. Hospital stay was shorter for VAAS mPCNL (mean reduction of 0.79 days; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in transfusion rates (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.46, 1.31]; P = 0.3) or haemoglobin deficit (0.00 g/dL [95% CI 0.22–0.22]; P > 0.9).ConclusionThe use of VAAS mPCNL offers significant advantages over CAS mPCNL, including shorter operating time, improved stone clearance, and reduced complications. These findings support the use of VAAS mPCNL in managing kidney stones, with further high‐quality studies recommended.
期刊介绍:
BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.