The impact of transportation equity on healthcare accessibility for children with asthma

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Mahnoush Minuyee , Abebe Dress Beza , Laleh Behjat , Anne Hicks , Merkebe Getachew Demissie
{"title":"The impact of transportation equity on healthcare accessibility for children with asthma","authors":"Mahnoush Minuyee ,&nbsp;Abebe Dress Beza ,&nbsp;Laleh Behjat ,&nbsp;Anne Hicks ,&nbsp;Merkebe Getachew Demissie","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Equitable access to healthcare facilities is essential to quality of life. However, many vulnerable communities encounter barriers because transportation systems are not designed to serve all residents equally. These disparities are particularly significant for childhood asthma, a public health concern where timely care is essential to prevent adverse outcomes. This study addresses the gaps in understanding how various transportation modes, including public transit, private vehicles, and taxis, influence healthcare accessibility for children with asthma. Using data from 18,393 hospital visits in Calgary, Canada (2010–2021), we evaluate spatiotemporal accessibility across three travel modes, considering emergency and non-emergency healthcare visit scenarios with varying travel cost thresholds through a two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Horizontal equity is quantified using the Gini coefficient, while vertical equity incorporates socioeconomic factors and asthma prevalence. Our findings reveal that personal vehicles provide the highest and most reliable accessibility, especially during emergencies, whereas public transit frequently fails to meet emergency accessibility demands, particularly at night. Taxis tend to be unaffordable for low-income users but offer comparable accessibility for higher-income travelers in non-emergency contexts. The vertical equity analysis identifies areas characterized by high socioeconomic vulnerability, elevated asthma prevalence, and limited access to healthcare, highlighting zones that warrant targeted interventions to enhance equity in healthcare accessibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101616"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225002957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equitable access to healthcare facilities is essential to quality of life. However, many vulnerable communities encounter barriers because transportation systems are not designed to serve all residents equally. These disparities are particularly significant for childhood asthma, a public health concern where timely care is essential to prevent adverse outcomes. This study addresses the gaps in understanding how various transportation modes, including public transit, private vehicles, and taxis, influence healthcare accessibility for children with asthma. Using data from 18,393 hospital visits in Calgary, Canada (2010–2021), we evaluate spatiotemporal accessibility across three travel modes, considering emergency and non-emergency healthcare visit scenarios with varying travel cost thresholds through a two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Horizontal equity is quantified using the Gini coefficient, while vertical equity incorporates socioeconomic factors and asthma prevalence. Our findings reveal that personal vehicles provide the highest and most reliable accessibility, especially during emergencies, whereas public transit frequently fails to meet emergency accessibility demands, particularly at night. Taxis tend to be unaffordable for low-income users but offer comparable accessibility for higher-income travelers in non-emergency contexts. The vertical equity analysis identifies areas characterized by high socioeconomic vulnerability, elevated asthma prevalence, and limited access to healthcare, highlighting zones that warrant targeted interventions to enhance equity in healthcare accessibility.
交通公平对哮喘儿童医疗可及性的影响
公平利用保健设施对提高生活质量至关重要。然而,许多脆弱社区遇到了障碍,因为交通系统的设计不是为了平等地为所有居民服务。这些差异在儿童哮喘方面尤为显著,这是一个公共卫生问题,及时护理对预防不良后果至关重要。本研究解决了在理解各种交通方式(包括公共交通、私家车和出租车)如何影响哮喘儿童的医疗保健可及性方面的差距。利用2010-2021年加拿大卡尔加里18,393次医院就诊数据,通过两步浮动集水区(2SFCA)方法,考虑不同出行成本阈值的急诊和非急诊医疗就诊情景,评估了三种出行模式的时空可达性。水平公平性使用基尼系数进行量化,而垂直公平性纳入社会经济因素和哮喘患病率。我们的研究结果表明,私家车提供了最高和最可靠的可达性,特别是在紧急情况下,而公共交通往往不能满足紧急情况下的可达性需求,特别是在夜间。对于低收入用户来说,出租车往往负担不起,但在非紧急情况下,出租车为高收入旅行者提供了相当的可达性。纵向公平分析确定了社会经济脆弱性高、哮喘患病率高和医疗保健服务有限的地区,强调了需要有针对性的干预措施以提高医疗保健服务可及性的公平性的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信