Reclaiming Power and Partnerships in the Wake of Donor Retraction through South–South Partnership

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Disasters Pub Date : 2025-08-29 DOI:10.1111/disa.70009
Basma Taysir El Doukhi
{"title":"Reclaiming Power and Partnerships in the Wake of Donor Retraction through South–South Partnership","authors":"Basma Taysir El Doukhi","doi":"10.1111/disa.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The recent US foreign assistance cuts represent not only a funding crisis but also a reckoning for the humanitarian and development sectors. This moment must catalyse a shift towards South–South cooperation, partnership and funding ecosystems that are not beholden to the strategic fluctuations of traditional donors. Global North institutions continue to marginalise the knowledge, leadership and capacities of Global South communities; thus, aid needs to be reshaped as solidarity, not charity. This paradigm shift would place communities, civil society and local governments at the centre of decision-making, reclaiming power, dignity and autonomy by local and displaced actors. To make this transition effective, national and local communities and actors must invest in capacity strengthening, inclusive governance models and equitable partnerships. Embracing these practices will not only increase the sustainability of interventions but also uphold the dignity and leadership of those at the frontlines of crisis and humanitarian action. In addition, it is imperative to reform existing aid architectures to reflect new geopolitical and environmental realities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":"49 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/disa.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent US foreign assistance cuts represent not only a funding crisis but also a reckoning for the humanitarian and development sectors. This moment must catalyse a shift towards South–South cooperation, partnership and funding ecosystems that are not beholden to the strategic fluctuations of traditional donors. Global North institutions continue to marginalise the knowledge, leadership and capacities of Global South communities; thus, aid needs to be reshaped as solidarity, not charity. This paradigm shift would place communities, civil society and local governments at the centre of decision-making, reclaiming power, dignity and autonomy by local and displaced actors. To make this transition effective, national and local communities and actors must invest in capacity strengthening, inclusive governance models and equitable partnerships. Embracing these practices will not only increase the sustainability of interventions but also uphold the dignity and leadership of those at the frontlines of crisis and humanitarian action. In addition, it is imperative to reform existing aid architectures to reflect new geopolitical and environmental realities.

捐助撤回后通过南南伙伴关系重新获得权力和伙伴关系
美国最近削减对外援助,不仅代表着一场资金危机,也代表着人道主义和发展领域的清算。这一时刻必须促进转向不受传统捐助者战略波动影响的南南合作、伙伴关系和供资生态系统。全球北方机构继续将全球南方社区的知识、领导和能力边缘化;因此,援助需要被重塑为团结,而不是慈善。这种模式转变将使社区、民间社会和地方政府成为决策的中心,重新获得地方和流离失所者的权力、尊严和自主权。为使这一转变有效,国家和地方社区及行为体必须投资于能力加强、包容性治理模式和公平伙伴关系。接受这些做法不仅将提高干预措施的可持续性,而且还将维护那些在危机和人道主义行动前线的人的尊严和领导力。此外,必须改革现有的援助架构,以反映新的地缘政治和环境现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disasters
Disasters Multiple-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信