Transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse without blind maneuver: Follow-up of 1 year or longer

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kikuo Okamura, Kensuke Yoshizawa, Hideji Kawanishi, Yudai Miyata, Junko Tanaka, Yasushi Yoshino
{"title":"Transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse without blind maneuver: Follow-up of 1 year or longer","authors":"Kikuo Okamura,&nbsp;Kensuke Yoshizawa,&nbsp;Hideji Kawanishi,&nbsp;Yudai Miyata,&nbsp;Junko Tanaka,&nbsp;Yasushi Yoshino","doi":"10.1111/jog.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To present surgical outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) without the blind maneuver, followed up 1 year or more.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included 140 consecutive women with a mean age of 77.6 years. We investigated surgical outcomes, including early and late complications and recurrence. Furthermore, we studied risk factors for recurrence and mesh extrusion using uni- and multivariate analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Surgery required 120 ± 21 min, with blood loss of 58 ± 63 g. Minor injuries of the bladder and rectum occurred in six and two patients, respectively. The urethral catheter was removed on postoperative day 1.2, and patients were discharged on postoperative day 4. There was no case of voiding dysfunction requiring catheterization. Wound infections occurred in four patients; but they subsided with only peroral antibiotics. Twenty-five patients had anatomical recurrences; of those, nine underwent additional surgery. Mesh extrusion occurred in six patients; the extruded part was excised in all patients. Eleven patients underwent transvaginal tape surgery for subsequent stress urinary incontinence. Logistic regression analyses indicated that risk factors for recurrence were prolapse stage and uterine status, and that for mesh extrusion was uterine status.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although recurrence and mesh-related problems could occur especially in patients with a higher stage of prolapse and/or a history of hysterectomy, it is considered that our technique is safe and effective to treat women with POP. However, we need to identify other, more appropriate techniques for patients with severe prolapse and/or a history of hysterectomy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To present surgical outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) without the blind maneuver, followed up 1 year or more.

Methods

This retrospective study included 140 consecutive women with a mean age of 77.6 years. We investigated surgical outcomes, including early and late complications and recurrence. Furthermore, we studied risk factors for recurrence and mesh extrusion using uni- and multivariate analyses.

Results

Surgery required 120 ± 21 min, with blood loss of 58 ± 63 g. Minor injuries of the bladder and rectum occurred in six and two patients, respectively. The urethral catheter was removed on postoperative day 1.2, and patients were discharged on postoperative day 4. There was no case of voiding dysfunction requiring catheterization. Wound infections occurred in four patients; but they subsided with only peroral antibiotics. Twenty-five patients had anatomical recurrences; of those, nine underwent additional surgery. Mesh extrusion occurred in six patients; the extruded part was excised in all patients. Eleven patients underwent transvaginal tape surgery for subsequent stress urinary incontinence. Logistic regression analyses indicated that risk factors for recurrence were prolapse stage and uterine status, and that for mesh extrusion was uterine status.

Conclusions

Although recurrence and mesh-related problems could occur especially in patients with a higher stage of prolapse and/or a history of hysterectomy, it is considered that our technique is safe and effective to treat women with POP. However, we need to identify other, more appropriate techniques for patients with severe prolapse and/or a history of hysterectomy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

无盲操作经阴道网状手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:随访1年或更长时间
目的观察无盲操作经阴道补片手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的手术效果,随访1年以上。方法回顾性研究纳入平均年龄77.6岁的连续140例女性。我们调查了手术结果,包括早期和晚期并发症和复发。此外,我们使用单因素和多因素分析研究了复发和网状物挤压的危险因素。结果手术时间120±21 min,出血量58±63 g。膀胱和直肠轻伤分别有6例和2例。术后第1.2天拔除导尿管,术后第4天出院。没有需要导尿的排尿功能障碍病例。4例患者发生伤口感染;但只用口服抗生素就能缓解。25例解剖性复发;其中9人接受了额外的手术。6例发生补片挤压;所有患者均切除挤压部分。11例患者因随后的压力性尿失禁接受阴道胶带手术。Logistic回归分析提示脱垂期和子宫状态是复发的危险因素,补片挤压的危险因素是子宫状态。结论虽然复发和网状相关问题可能发生在脱垂程度较高和/或有子宫切除术史的患者中,但我们认为我们的技术是安全有效的治疗女性POP。然而,对于严重脱垂和/或有子宫切除术史的患者,我们需要确定其他更合适的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信