Virucidal Efficacy of Organic Acids and Plant Essential Oils

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Norma Patricia Silva-Beltran, Stephanie A. Boone, Jon Q. Lehman, Justin T. Clark, Nick Duane Betts-Childress, Charles P. Gerba, M. Khalid Ijaz, Julie McKinney, Kelly R. Bright
{"title":"Virucidal Efficacy of Organic Acids and Plant Essential Oils","authors":"Norma Patricia Silva-Beltran,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Boone,&nbsp;Jon Q. Lehman,&nbsp;Justin T. Clark,&nbsp;Nick Duane Betts-Childress,&nbsp;Charles P. Gerba,&nbsp;M. Khalid Ijaz,&nbsp;Julie McKinney,&nbsp;Kelly R. Bright","doi":"10.1007/s12560-025-09660-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Currently, the predominant commercially available disinfectants and sanitizers are formulated with active ingredients including alcohol, halogenated compounds (e.g., sodium hypochlorite), surfactants, oxidizing agents (eg., hydrogen peroxide), and quaternary ammonium compounds. Natural products represent an alternative since they are often effective microbicides and are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) due to their long history of use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of several organic acids and plant essential oils against three bacteriophages (MS2, ΦX174, PR772) with different genome characteristics (e.g., RNA versus DNA, single-stranded versus double-stranded) and against an enveloped and non-enveloped mammalian virus (human coronavirus 229E and feline calicivirus, respectively). The active components of essential oils (carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, thymol) and organic acids (acetic, salicylic, tartaric) demonstrated virucidal activity against the three bacteriophages (typically 1.00 log<sub>10</sub> to &gt; 5.00 log<sub>10</sub> reductions within 10 min); however, ΦX174 exhibited lesser susceptibility (&lt; 1.0 log<sub>10</sub> reduction with all but salicylic acid) and PR772 was the most resistant to cinnamaldehyde. It is unclear why ΦX174, a ssDNA virus, was more resistant to these antimicrobials than the ssRNA (MS2) and dsDNA (PR772) viruses. Carvacrol, eugenol, and thymol were also highly effective against both mammalian viruses (≥ 1.49 and &gt; 3.00 log<sub>10</sub> reductions within one and 10 min, respectively). Salicylic acid was the most effective antimicrobial tested with &gt; 3.84 log<sub>10</sub> reductions observed with all the viruses in one minute. Based on these results, several of the organic acids and essential oil components included appear to be viable eco-friendly alternatives to currently used disinfectants/sanitizers that are effective against viruses possessing diverse genomic and morphological characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":563,"journal":{"name":"Food and Environmental Virology","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Environmental Virology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12560-025-09660-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, the predominant commercially available disinfectants and sanitizers are formulated with active ingredients including alcohol, halogenated compounds (e.g., sodium hypochlorite), surfactants, oxidizing agents (eg., hydrogen peroxide), and quaternary ammonium compounds. Natural products represent an alternative since they are often effective microbicides and are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) due to their long history of use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of several organic acids and plant essential oils against three bacteriophages (MS2, ΦX174, PR772) with different genome characteristics (e.g., RNA versus DNA, single-stranded versus double-stranded) and against an enveloped and non-enveloped mammalian virus (human coronavirus 229E and feline calicivirus, respectively). The active components of essential oils (carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, thymol) and organic acids (acetic, salicylic, tartaric) demonstrated virucidal activity against the three bacteriophages (typically 1.00 log10 to > 5.00 log10 reductions within 10 min); however, ΦX174 exhibited lesser susceptibility (< 1.0 log10 reduction with all but salicylic acid) and PR772 was the most resistant to cinnamaldehyde. It is unclear why ΦX174, a ssDNA virus, was more resistant to these antimicrobials than the ssRNA (MS2) and dsDNA (PR772) viruses. Carvacrol, eugenol, and thymol were also highly effective against both mammalian viruses (≥ 1.49 and > 3.00 log10 reductions within one and 10 min, respectively). Salicylic acid was the most effective antimicrobial tested with > 3.84 log10 reductions observed with all the viruses in one minute. Based on these results, several of the organic acids and essential oil components included appear to be viable eco-friendly alternatives to currently used disinfectants/sanitizers that are effective against viruses possessing diverse genomic and morphological characteristics.

有机酸和植物精油的杀病毒效果
目前,市售的主要消毒剂和消毒液的配方中含有活性成分,包括酒精、卤化化合物(如次氯酸钠)、表面活性剂、氧化剂(如氯酸钠)。(过氧化氢)和季铵化合物。天然产品是另一种选择,因为它们通常是有效的杀微生物剂,由于使用历史悠久,通常被认为是安全的(GRAS)。本研究的目的是评估几种有机酸和植物精油对具有不同基因组特征(如RNA与DNA、单链与双链)的三种噬菌体(MS2、ΦX174、PR772)以及一种包膜和非包膜哺乳动物病毒(分别为人类冠状病毒229E和猫冠状病毒)的功效。精油的有效成分(香豆醇、肉桂醛、丁香酚、百里香酚)和有机酸(乙酸、水杨酸、酒石酸)对三种噬菌体具有抗病毒活性(通常在10分钟内降低1.00 log10至5.00 log10);然而,ΦX174对肉桂醛的敏感性较低(除水杨酸外,其余均降低了1.0 log10), PR772对肉桂醛的抗性最强。目前尚不清楚为什么ssDNA病毒ΦX174比ssRNA (MS2)和dsDNA (PR772)病毒对这些抗菌剂的耐药性更强。香芹酚、丁香酚和百里香酚对这两种哺乳动物病毒也非常有效(在1分钟和10分钟内分别降低≥1.49和3.00 log10)。水杨酸是最有效的抗菌剂,在一分钟内对所有病毒都有3.84 log10的抑制作用。基于这些结果,所含的几种有机酸和精油成分似乎是目前使用的消毒剂/杀菌剂的可行的环保替代品,它们对具有不同基因组和形态特征的病毒有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Environmental Virology
Food and Environmental Virology ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Food and Environmental Virology publishes original articles, notes and review articles on any aspect relating to the transmission of pathogenic viruses via the environment (water, air, soil etc.) and foods. This includes epidemiological studies, identification of novel or emerging pathogens, methods of analysis or characterisation, studies on survival and elimination, and development of procedural controls for industrial processes, e.g. HACCP plans. The journal will cover all aspects of this important area, and encompass studies on any human, animal, and plant pathogenic virus which is capable of transmission via the environment or food.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信