{"title":"Development and Application of the WFS-175: A Novel Multidimensional Score for Wrist Function","authors":"Sang Anh Nguyen MD , Doanh Quoc Tran PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We present a novel protocol for wrist function assessment that integrates both objective factors (range of motion and grip strength) and subjective domains (pain, motor function, and quality of life) into the composite Wrist Function Score - 175 (WFS-175) score.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The protocol consists of three main steps: (1) data collection, which involves measuring the wrist range of motion in six directions using a goniometer and grip strength, including maximum strength, endurance, and recovery, using a Jamar dynamometer, alongside concurrent subjective assessment with a standardized questionnaire; (2) standardization of all data onto a unified scoring scale, applying a linear formula to calculate the total WFS-175 score (maximum 175 points), with the following components: range of motion (30 points), grip strength (40 points), pain (25 points), motor function (40 points), and quality of life (40 points); and (3) input of results into the AppSheet/Google Sheets system, which provides automated calculation, storage, reporting, and graphical visualization for longitudinal tracking of functional recovery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This protocol yields a standardized assessment form that enables precise calculation of the WFS-175 score. It integrates muscular endurance and recovery measures and fully digitalizes the workflow.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Initial applications show that the WFS-175 score effectively evaluates wrist function and tracks recovery over time. For example, a postoperative patient scored 164/175, indicating excellent recovery.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The WFS-175 protocol offers a novel and digital-ready solution for standardized wrist function assessment. By combining objective and subjective measures in one scoring system, it enhances sensitivity and supports clinical decision making in modern rehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100819"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514125001392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
We present a novel protocol for wrist function assessment that integrates both objective factors (range of motion and grip strength) and subjective domains (pain, motor function, and quality of life) into the composite Wrist Function Score - 175 (WFS-175) score.
Methods
The protocol consists of three main steps: (1) data collection, which involves measuring the wrist range of motion in six directions using a goniometer and grip strength, including maximum strength, endurance, and recovery, using a Jamar dynamometer, alongside concurrent subjective assessment with a standardized questionnaire; (2) standardization of all data onto a unified scoring scale, applying a linear formula to calculate the total WFS-175 score (maximum 175 points), with the following components: range of motion (30 points), grip strength (40 points), pain (25 points), motor function (40 points), and quality of life (40 points); and (3) input of results into the AppSheet/Google Sheets system, which provides automated calculation, storage, reporting, and graphical visualization for longitudinal tracking of functional recovery.
Results
This protocol yields a standardized assessment form that enables precise calculation of the WFS-175 score. It integrates muscular endurance and recovery measures and fully digitalizes the workflow.
Conclusions
Initial applications show that the WFS-175 score effectively evaluates wrist function and tracks recovery over time. For example, a postoperative patient scored 164/175, indicating excellent recovery.
Clinical relevance
The WFS-175 protocol offers a novel and digital-ready solution for standardized wrist function assessment. By combining objective and subjective measures in one scoring system, it enhances sensitivity and supports clinical decision making in modern rehabilitation.