Do external threats decrease political polarization? Climate change and immigration discussions on Finnish Twitter after the Russian invasion of Ukraine

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Antti Gronow , Yan Xia , Arttu Malkamäki , Mikko Kivelä , Tuomas Ylä-Anttila
{"title":"Do external threats decrease political polarization? Climate change and immigration discussions on Finnish Twitter after the Russian invasion of Ukraine","authors":"Antti Gronow ,&nbsp;Yan Xia ,&nbsp;Arttu Malkamäki ,&nbsp;Mikko Kivelä ,&nbsp;Tuomas Ylä-Anttila","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Increasing political polarization poses a serious challenge to democracy. Research has suggested that the rise of an external threat caused by an adversarial state can reduce polarization and increase social cohesion, but the evidence for this claim is mixed. To better understand this phenomenon, we examine whether the external threat posed by Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 depolarized the divisive topics of immigration and climate change on social media in Russia's neighbor, Finland. By analyzing retweet networks before and after the invasion, we find that polarization decreased, but only selectively. The depolarizing effect was confined to specific subtopics and limited by motivated reasoning - the tendency to interpret new information in a way that fits pre-existing polarized frames. The results suggest that external threats caused by adversarial states can have depolarizing effects, but they are likely to be limited, at least in the context of polarized social media bubbles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 108775"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225002225","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing political polarization poses a serious challenge to democracy. Research has suggested that the rise of an external threat caused by an adversarial state can reduce polarization and increase social cohesion, but the evidence for this claim is mixed. To better understand this phenomenon, we examine whether the external threat posed by Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 depolarized the divisive topics of immigration and climate change on social media in Russia's neighbor, Finland. By analyzing retweet networks before and after the invasion, we find that polarization decreased, but only selectively. The depolarizing effect was confined to specific subtopics and limited by motivated reasoning - the tendency to interpret new information in a way that fits pre-existing polarized frames. The results suggest that external threats caused by adversarial states can have depolarizing effects, but they are likely to be limited, at least in the context of polarized social media bubbles.
外部威胁会减少政治两极分化吗?俄罗斯入侵乌克兰后,芬兰Twitter上的气候变化和移民讨论
日益加剧的政治两极分化是对民主的严重挑战。研究表明,敌对国家造成的外部威胁的增加可以减少两极分化,增加社会凝聚力,但这一说法的证据好坏参半。为了更好地理解这一现象,我们研究了俄罗斯在2022年2月入侵乌克兰所构成的外部威胁是否消除了俄罗斯邻国芬兰社交媒体上移民和气候变化等分裂话题的两极分化。通过分析入侵前后的转发网络,我们发现两极分化有所减少,但只是选择性的。去极化效应局限于特定的子主题,并受到动机推理的限制——以一种符合已有极化框架的方式解释新信息的倾向。研究结果表明,敌对国家造成的外部威胁可能会产生去极化效应,但它们可能是有限的,至少在两极分化的社交媒体泡沫背景下是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信