Are plant-based milks unique products or dairy milk substitutes? A study of consumer perceptions, uses, and consumption motivations of plant-based and dairy milks

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Christy Alsado, Lingyun Chen, Wendy Wismer
{"title":"Are plant-based milks unique products or dairy milk substitutes? A study of consumer perceptions, uses, and consumption motivations of plant-based and dairy milks","authors":"Christy Alsado,&nbsp;Lingyun Chen,&nbsp;Wendy Wismer","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plant-based milks (PBMs) are positioned as dairy alternatives, yet consumer perception and sensory issues are barriers to acceptance. This study aimed to characterize milks based on sensory attributes, perceptions, and uses, and to determine dairy consumption motivations of consumers of both plant-based and dairy milks. Dairy, oat, pea, and blended milks (<em>n</em> = 12) were evaluated by consumers (<em>n</em> = 109) for overall liking (9-point hedonic scale), sensory attributes (Rate-All-That-Apply), perceptions and uses (Check-All-That-Apply), and dairy consumption motivation based on factors ‘Natural,’ ‘Need,’ ‘Normal,’ and ‘Nice.’ Dairy and oat milks were liked significantly more than pea milks and blends, generating two consumer clusters: dairy-oat-highlikers (high liking for dairy and oat milk) and dairy-plant-modlikers (moderate liking for dairy and specific plant-based milks). ‘Sweet,’ ‘smooth,’ and ‘creamy’ were identified as drivers of liking through Principal Component Analysis and Multifactor Analysis, respectively. Moreover, ‘simple,’ ‘traditional,’ ‘comforting,’ and varied product uses were correlated with most liked milks and associated with mean liking increase in Penalty Analysis. A key study finding was that plant-based milk consumers continued to consume dairy milk because of the perceived ‘Need’ for it (<em>p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.0001</em>)<em>.</em> Subsequently, ‘Need’ was a prevalent consumption motivation across consumer clusters, regardless of varying degrees of liking for both plant-based and dairy milk. This study provides relevant consumer insights into the drivers of liking of PBMs and perceived ‘Need’ for dairy consumption. In developing PBMs, the aim may not be to replicate milk, but to shift focus on enhancing three key sensory attributes and creating a simpler product with more uses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 105681"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002563","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant-based milks (PBMs) are positioned as dairy alternatives, yet consumer perception and sensory issues are barriers to acceptance. This study aimed to characterize milks based on sensory attributes, perceptions, and uses, and to determine dairy consumption motivations of consumers of both plant-based and dairy milks. Dairy, oat, pea, and blended milks (n = 12) were evaluated by consumers (n = 109) for overall liking (9-point hedonic scale), sensory attributes (Rate-All-That-Apply), perceptions and uses (Check-All-That-Apply), and dairy consumption motivation based on factors ‘Natural,’ ‘Need,’ ‘Normal,’ and ‘Nice.’ Dairy and oat milks were liked significantly more than pea milks and blends, generating two consumer clusters: dairy-oat-highlikers (high liking for dairy and oat milk) and dairy-plant-modlikers (moderate liking for dairy and specific plant-based milks). ‘Sweet,’ ‘smooth,’ and ‘creamy’ were identified as drivers of liking through Principal Component Analysis and Multifactor Analysis, respectively. Moreover, ‘simple,’ ‘traditional,’ ‘comforting,’ and varied product uses were correlated with most liked milks and associated with mean liking increase in Penalty Analysis. A key study finding was that plant-based milk consumers continued to consume dairy milk because of the perceived ‘Need’ for it (p < 0.0001). Subsequently, ‘Need’ was a prevalent consumption motivation across consumer clusters, regardless of varying degrees of liking for both plant-based and dairy milk. This study provides relevant consumer insights into the drivers of liking of PBMs and perceived ‘Need’ for dairy consumption. In developing PBMs, the aim may not be to replicate milk, but to shift focus on enhancing three key sensory attributes and creating a simpler product with more uses.
植物性牛奶是独特的产品还是乳制品的替代品?一项关于消费者对植物性和乳制品的认知、使用和消费动机的研究
植物性牛奶(PBMs)被定位为乳制品的替代品,但消费者的认知和感官问题是接受的障碍。本研究旨在基于感官属性、感知和用途来描述牛奶的特征,并确定消费者对植物性牛奶和乳制品的消费动机。乳制品、燕麦、豌豆和混合牛奶(n = 12)由消费者(n = 109)根据“天然”、“需要”、“正常”和“好”等因素对总体喜好(9分享乐量表)、感官属性(Rate-All-That-Apply)、感知和用途(Check-All-That-Apply)以及乳制品消费动机进行评估。“人们对乳制品和燕麦牛奶的喜爱程度明显高于豌豆牛奶和混合牛奶,由此产生了两类消费者:乳制品-燕麦高偏好者(对乳制品和燕麦牛奶的喜爱程度很高)和乳制品-植物型偏好者(对乳制品和特定植物型牛奶的喜爱程度中等)。”通过主成分分析和多因素分析,分别确定了“甜”、“顺滑”和“奶油”是喜欢的驱动因素。此外,在惩罚分析中,“简单”、“传统”、“舒适”和各种产品的使用与最受欢迎的牛奶相关,并与平均喜欢度的增加相关。一项重要的研究发现是,植物性牛奶的消费者继续消费牛奶,因为他们认为“需要”牛奶(p < 0.0001)。随后,“需要”成为了消费者群体中普遍存在的消费动机,无论他们对植物奶和乳制品的喜爱程度如何。本研究为消费者对pbm的喜爱和对乳制品消费的感知“需求”的驱动因素提供了相关的见解。在开发pbm的过程中,目标可能不是复制牛奶,而是将重点转移到增强三个关键的感官属性上,并创造一种用途更广泛的更简单的产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信