The evolution of the meniscus: Where surgical advancements meet translational research

IF 2.8
Darya I. Lee , Rachel J. Lovejoy , Morgan H. Jones , Elizabeth G. Matzkin , Jeffrey N. Katz
{"title":"The evolution of the meniscus: Where surgical advancements meet translational research","authors":"Darya I. Lee ,&nbsp;Rachel J. Lovejoy ,&nbsp;Morgan H. Jones ,&nbsp;Elizabeth G. Matzkin ,&nbsp;Jeffrey N. Katz","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate key historical developments in meniscal pathobiology research and surgical advancements to capture pivotal moments in the evolution towards contemporary meniscus treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Hollis, Harvard's online library database, to identify influential primary and secondary literature on meniscus form, function, and surgical techniques. Primary sources generally consisted of case reports or research investigations, while secondary sources included literature reviews. We used these sources to create a chronology of research findings, highlighting periods of controversy, shifts in opinion, and technological innovation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The meniscus was considered a functionless, vestigial structure for most of modern history until research in the mid-1940s identified significant degenerative changes among patients following total meniscectomy. Interest in the meniscus surged following this discovery, spurring investigations that broadened scientific understanding of the vasculature, neuroanatomy, and biochemical composition of the meniscus. In turn, these findings altered treatment practices in favor of meniscal preservation and stimulated research into the implications of altered hoop tension and meniscus vascularity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The history and advancement of meniscal surgery has and continues to be shaped by translational research that has broadened scientific understanding of the form and function of the meniscus. We demonstrate that advancements in surgical techniques addressing meniscal tears were preceded by translational research that broadened understanding of the form and function of the meniscus. Future meniscal research should continue to utilize both translational and clinical findings to optimize meniscal tear treatment methodologies, while also minimizing risk of osteoarthritis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125001025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate key historical developments in meniscal pathobiology research and surgical advancements to capture pivotal moments in the evolution towards contemporary meniscus treatment.

Design

We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Hollis, Harvard's online library database, to identify influential primary and secondary literature on meniscus form, function, and surgical techniques. Primary sources generally consisted of case reports or research investigations, while secondary sources included literature reviews. We used these sources to create a chronology of research findings, highlighting periods of controversy, shifts in opinion, and technological innovation.

Results

The meniscus was considered a functionless, vestigial structure for most of modern history until research in the mid-1940s identified significant degenerative changes among patients following total meniscectomy. Interest in the meniscus surged following this discovery, spurring investigations that broadened scientific understanding of the vasculature, neuroanatomy, and biochemical composition of the meniscus. In turn, these findings altered treatment practices in favor of meniscal preservation and stimulated research into the implications of altered hoop tension and meniscus vascularity.

Conclusions

The history and advancement of meniscal surgery has and continues to be shaped by translational research that has broadened scientific understanding of the form and function of the meniscus. We demonstrate that advancements in surgical techniques addressing meniscal tears were preceded by translational research that broadened understanding of the form and function of the meniscus. Future meniscal research should continue to utilize both translational and clinical findings to optimize meniscal tear treatment methodologies, while also minimizing risk of osteoarthritis.
半月板的进化:外科进步与转化研究的结合
目的评价半月板病理生物学研究的关键历史发展和手术进展,以捕捉当代半月板治疗发展的关键时刻。我们在PubMed和哈佛大学在线图书馆数据库Hollis中进行了文献检索,以确定有关半月板形态、功能和手术技术的有影响力的主要和次要文献。一手来源通常包括病例报告或研究调查,而第二手来源包括文献综述。我们利用这些资源创建了一个研究成果的年表,突出了争议、观点转变和技术创新的时期。结果:在现代历史上,半月板被认为是一种无功能的退化结构,直到20世纪40年代中期的研究发现,全半月板切除术后患者出现了明显的退行性改变。在这一发现之后,人们对半月板的兴趣激增,刺激了对半月板血管系统、神经解剖学和生化组成的科学理解的研究。反过来,这些发现改变了治疗方法,有利于半月板的保存,并刺激了对改变环张力和半月板血管的影响的研究。结论半月板手术的历史和发展已经并将继续受到转化研究的影响,这些研究拓宽了对半月板形态和功能的科学认识。我们证明,在解决半月板撕裂的手术技术的进步之前,翻译研究扩大了半月板的形式和功能的理解。未来的半月板研究应继续利用转化和临床研究结果来优化半月板撕裂治疗方法,同时尽量减少骨关节炎的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信