The effects of physical activity and nutrition interventions on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Q3 Nursing
Ruth Martin , Aine Cronin , Alexandra Cremona
{"title":"The effects of physical activity and nutrition interventions on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review with meta-analysis","authors":"Ruth Martin ,&nbsp;Aine Cronin ,&nbsp;Alexandra Cremona","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This review investigates the effectiveness of physical activity and nutrition interventions on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1D).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases (PsycInfo, Medline, CINAHL complete, Embase, Cochrane Library) and trial registries were searched from 2008. Inclusion criteria included adolescents aged between 10 and 19 years with a diagnosis of T1D, interventional studies involving physical activity and/or nutrition intervention, and HbA1c included as an outcome measure. Information about the studies, participants and outcome measures were extracted from the included studies. The risk-of-bias was performed using Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 tool (ROB-2) and risk-of-bias non-randomized intervention studies (ROBINS-I) tool. The certainty of evidence was assessed using ‘Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation’ (GRADE) guidance. A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions on HbA1c.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The twelve eligible randomised controlled trials included 680 participants in total (of which 658 were diagnosed with T1D). HbA1c for adolescents with T1D at baseline was between 6.9-11%. There was no statistically significant evidence of effect noted for physical activity interventions (6 studies, 362 participants, mean difference -0.40, 95% confidence interval -0.88, 0.08; P = 0.11) or nutrition interventions (5 studies, 224 participants, mean difference -0.05, 95% confidence interval -0.31, 0.21; P = 0.71). Moderate heterogeneity was reported for physical activity (Chi<sup>2</sup> 10.48, P = 0.06), I<sup>2</sup>=52%) and nutrition interventions (Chi<sup>2</sup> 15.59, P = 0.004, I<sup>2</sup>=74%). There was a high risk of bias for two studies and ‘some concerns’ for six studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While no statistically significant pooled effects on HbA1c were observed for physical activity or nutrition interventions, most confidence intervals trended toward lower HbA1c, suggesting potential for clinically meaningful benefit. Combined interventions showed signals of HbA1c reduction in small studies, but evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Overall certainty was low, highlighting the need for robust trials of structured, combined interventions in adolescents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"63 ","pages":"Pages 238-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268525000920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

This review investigates the effectiveness of physical activity and nutrition interventions on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1D).

Methods

This review was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases (PsycInfo, Medline, CINAHL complete, Embase, Cochrane Library) and trial registries were searched from 2008. Inclusion criteria included adolescents aged between 10 and 19 years with a diagnosis of T1D, interventional studies involving physical activity and/or nutrition intervention, and HbA1c included as an outcome measure. Information about the studies, participants and outcome measures were extracted from the included studies. The risk-of-bias was performed using Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 tool (ROB-2) and risk-of-bias non-randomized intervention studies (ROBINS-I) tool. The certainty of evidence was assessed using ‘Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation’ (GRADE) guidance. A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions on HbA1c.

Results

The twelve eligible randomised controlled trials included 680 participants in total (of which 658 were diagnosed with T1D). HbA1c for adolescents with T1D at baseline was between 6.9-11%. There was no statistically significant evidence of effect noted for physical activity interventions (6 studies, 362 participants, mean difference -0.40, 95% confidence interval -0.88, 0.08; P = 0.11) or nutrition interventions (5 studies, 224 participants, mean difference -0.05, 95% confidence interval -0.31, 0.21; P = 0.71). Moderate heterogeneity was reported for physical activity (Chi2 10.48, P = 0.06), I2=52%) and nutrition interventions (Chi2 15.59, P = 0.004, I2=74%). There was a high risk of bias for two studies and ‘some concerns’ for six studies.

Conclusions

While no statistically significant pooled effects on HbA1c were observed for physical activity or nutrition interventions, most confidence intervals trended toward lower HbA1c, suggesting potential for clinically meaningful benefit. Combined interventions showed signals of HbA1c reduction in small studies, but evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Overall certainty was low, highlighting the need for robust trials of structured, combined interventions in adolescents.
体育活动和营养干预对青少年1型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
目的:本综述探讨体育活动和营养干预对青少年1型糖尿病(T1D)患者糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的影响。方法本综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。检索了2008年以来的数据库(PsycInfo, Medline, CINAHL complete, Embase, Cochrane Library)和试验注册库。纳入标准包括诊断为T1D的年龄在10至19岁之间的青少年,涉及体育活动和/或营养干预的介入性研究,并将HbA1c作为结果测量指标。从纳入的研究中提取有关研究、参与者和结果测量的信息。偏倚风险采用Cochrane风险-2工具(rob2)和偏倚风险-非随机干预研究(robins - 1)工具进行。使用“建议评估、发展和评价分级”(GRADE)指南评估证据的确定性。进行了一项荟萃分析来评估这些干预措施对HbA1c的有效性。结果12项符合条件的随机对照试验共纳入680名参与者(其中658名被诊断为T1D)。青少年T1D患者的HbA1c基线值在6.9-11%之间。体力活动干预(6项研究,362名受试者,平均差值-0.40,95%可信区间-0.88,0.08,P = 0.11)或营养干预(5项研究,224名受试者,平均差值-0.05,95%可信区间-0.31,0.21,P = 0.71)没有统计学上显著的影响。体力活动(Chi2 10.48, P = 0.06, I2=52%)和营养干预(Chi2 15.59, P = 0.004, I2=74%)存在中等异质性。两项研究存在高偏倚风险,六项研究存在“一些担忧”。结论:虽然没有观察到体育活动或营养干预对HbA1c的综合影响,但大多数置信区间倾向于降低HbA1c,这表明可能有临床意义的益处。在小型研究中,联合干预显示了HbA1c降低的信号,但证据仍然有限且不一致。总体确定性较低,强调需要对青少年进行结构化、联合干预的有力试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信