Unpacking the vendor–task fit in crowdsourcing contests: Antecedents of vendors’ bidding behavior and outcomes

IF 8.2 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Xiaolun Wang , Tianrun Zhao , Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao , Jie Gu
{"title":"Unpacking the vendor–task fit in crowdsourcing contests: Antecedents of vendors’ bidding behavior and outcomes","authors":"Xiaolun Wang ,&nbsp;Tianrun Zhao ,&nbsp;Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao ,&nbsp;Jie Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.im.2025.104239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>On online crowdsourcing platforms, to help employers identify the right vendor for the appropriate task from a variety of choices, it is important to evaluate the vendor–task fit (VTF), the degree to which a vendor’s competence fits a particular task. To address gaps in fit theories, we conceptualize VTF as consisting of two core dimensions – experience similarity and skill matching – based on a vendor’s experience and skills. From the perspective of a vendor’s cost–benefit analysis in crowdsourcing contests, we propose an intricate relationship between VTF, vendors’ bidding behavior (bidding prices), and bidding outcomes (winning probabilities). Using a sample of 5,141 bidding tasks collected from epwk.com from 2010 to 2023, we trained the Doc2Vec deep-learning algorithm to compute VTF. Our findings indicate that experience similarity lowers vendors’ bidding prices and improves bidding outcomes, while skill matching increases vendors’ bidding prices without affecting bidding outcomes. In addition, task complexity and capability level positively moderate the effect of experience similarity on bidding prices, whereas competition intensity has no significant effect. This study enriches theories of fit between tasks and vendors’ competencies in crowdsourcing contests, and offers practical insights for vendors, employers, and crowdsourcing platforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56291,"journal":{"name":"Information & Management","volume":"62 8","pages":"Article 104239"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720625001429","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On online crowdsourcing platforms, to help employers identify the right vendor for the appropriate task from a variety of choices, it is important to evaluate the vendor–task fit (VTF), the degree to which a vendor’s competence fits a particular task. To address gaps in fit theories, we conceptualize VTF as consisting of two core dimensions – experience similarity and skill matching – based on a vendor’s experience and skills. From the perspective of a vendor’s cost–benefit analysis in crowdsourcing contests, we propose an intricate relationship between VTF, vendors’ bidding behavior (bidding prices), and bidding outcomes (winning probabilities). Using a sample of 5,141 bidding tasks collected from epwk.com from 2010 to 2023, we trained the Doc2Vec deep-learning algorithm to compute VTF. Our findings indicate that experience similarity lowers vendors’ bidding prices and improves bidding outcomes, while skill matching increases vendors’ bidding prices without affecting bidding outcomes. In addition, task complexity and capability level positively moderate the effect of experience similarity on bidding prices, whereas competition intensity has no significant effect. This study enriches theories of fit between tasks and vendors’ competencies in crowdsourcing contests, and offers practical insights for vendors, employers, and crowdsourcing platforms.
解开众包竞赛中供应商与任务的契合:供应商竞标行为和结果的前提
在在线众包平台上,为了帮助雇主从众多选择中找到合适的供应商来完成合适的任务,评估供应商-任务契合度(VTF)是很重要的,即供应商的能力与特定任务的契合程度。为了解决契合理论中的差距,我们将VTF概念化为基于供应商经验和技能的两个核心维度——经验相似性和技能匹配。从众包竞争中供应商成本效益分析的角度出发,提出了VTF、供应商投标行为(投标价格)和投标结果(中标概率)之间的复杂关系。使用epwk.com从2010年到2023年收集的5141个投标任务样本,我们训练Doc2Vec深度学习算法来计算VTF。研究结果表明,经验相似性降低了供应商的投标价格,提高了投标结果,而技能匹配提高了供应商的投标价格,但不影响投标结果。任务复杂性和能力水平正向调节经验相似性对投标价格的影响,而竞争强度对投标价格的影响不显著。本研究丰富了众包竞赛中任务与供应商能力匹配的理论,并为供应商、雇主和众包平台提供了实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information & Management
Information & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Information & Management is a publication that caters to researchers in the field of information systems as well as managers, professionals, administrators, and senior executives involved in designing, implementing, and managing Information Systems Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信