‘Spreading love’ or ‘working holiday’? The narrative of altruistic rhetorics, financial motivations, and risks in domestic and transnational Taiwanese egg donation

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jung Chen
{"title":"‘Spreading love’ or ‘working holiday’? The narrative of altruistic rhetorics, financial motivations, and risks in domestic and transnational Taiwanese egg donation","authors":"Jung Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the narratives of egg donation (ED) in Taiwan and transnational contexts. Although commercial ED is prohibited in Taiwan, legally fixed compensation remains relatively high (USD 3000). Internationally, ED is a profitable segment of the fertility industry, driving cross-border donor recruitment. Targeted donors are typically young women who, while economically precarious, are valued for their biocapital, namely, high-quality oocytes. Despite this, many receive limited information about the health risks associated with hormone stimulation and oocyte retrieval. Drawing on 362 user-generated posts (2018–2025) from a Taiwanese online forum, alongside content from the websites of 40 domestic fertility clinics and six transnational ED brokers, this study conducts a thematic analysis of recruitment strategies and donor responses. Key themes include donor representation, eligibility, medical procedures, compensation, and the (non-)disclosure of health risks. Findings reveal a complex entanglement of commodification and decommodification across both domestic and cross-border ED contexts. In Taiwan, clinics typically use altruistic narratives to frame ED, while donors describe it as a meaningful act of care or ‘spreading love’, rather than reproductive labour. In contrast, cross-border ED is more explicitly tied to capitalist logics, often depicted as a profitable ‘working holiday’, reinforcing racialised commodification. Importantly, financial motivation and altruistic rhetoric are not mutually exclusive; instead, they operate in tandem to construct socially acceptable narratives that mitigate stigma and imbue ED with emotional and moral significance. The study recommends mandating comprehensive risk disclosure in Taiwan and developing transnational regulatory frameworks to reduce the legal and health risks of cross-border ED.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 118520"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008512","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the narratives of egg donation (ED) in Taiwan and transnational contexts. Although commercial ED is prohibited in Taiwan, legally fixed compensation remains relatively high (USD 3000). Internationally, ED is a profitable segment of the fertility industry, driving cross-border donor recruitment. Targeted donors are typically young women who, while economically precarious, are valued for their biocapital, namely, high-quality oocytes. Despite this, many receive limited information about the health risks associated with hormone stimulation and oocyte retrieval. Drawing on 362 user-generated posts (2018–2025) from a Taiwanese online forum, alongside content from the websites of 40 domestic fertility clinics and six transnational ED brokers, this study conducts a thematic analysis of recruitment strategies and donor responses. Key themes include donor representation, eligibility, medical procedures, compensation, and the (non-)disclosure of health risks. Findings reveal a complex entanglement of commodification and decommodification across both domestic and cross-border ED contexts. In Taiwan, clinics typically use altruistic narratives to frame ED, while donors describe it as a meaningful act of care or ‘spreading love’, rather than reproductive labour. In contrast, cross-border ED is more explicitly tied to capitalist logics, often depicted as a profitable ‘working holiday’, reinforcing racialised commodification. Importantly, financial motivation and altruistic rhetoric are not mutually exclusive; instead, they operate in tandem to construct socially acceptable narratives that mitigate stigma and imbue ED with emotional and moral significance. The study recommends mandating comprehensive risk disclosure in Taiwan and developing transnational regulatory frameworks to reduce the legal and health risks of cross-border ED.
“传播爱心”还是“打工度假”?​
本研究探讨台湾与跨国背景下的卵子捐赠叙事。虽然商业ED在台湾是被禁止的,但是法定的固定赔偿仍然比较高(3000美元)。在国际上,ED是生育行业的一个有利可图的部分,推动着跨境捐赠者的招募。目标捐赠者通常是年轻女性,她们虽然经济不稳定,但因其生物资本(即高质量的卵母细胞)而受到重视。尽管如此,许多人对激素刺激和卵母细胞回收相关的健康风险知之甚少。利用台湾某在线论坛上的362篇用户帖子(2018-2025),以及40家国内生育诊所和6家跨国ED经纪人网站上的内容,本研究对招募策略和捐赠者反应进行了专题分析。关键主题包括捐赠者代表、资格、医疗程序、补偿和(不)披露健康风险。研究结果揭示了国内和跨境ED环境中商品化和商品化的复杂纠缠。在台湾,诊所通常用利他主义的叙事来描述勃起功能障碍,而捐赠者则将其描述为一种有意义的护理行为或“传播爱”,而不是生殖劳动。相比之下,跨境教育更明确地与资本主义逻辑联系在一起,经常被描述为有利可图的“工作假期”,加强了种族化的商品化。重要的是,经济动机和利他主义的修辞并不相互排斥;相反,它们串联起来,构建社会可接受的叙事,减轻耻辱感,并赋予ED情感和道德意义。该研究建议在台湾强制进行全面的风险披露,并制定跨国监管框架,以减少跨境ED的法律和健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信