Stigma intersectionality and its impact on an epilepsy stigma self-management program

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sarah Prieto , Elaine T. Kiriakopoulos , Allyson Goldstein , Sarah Kaden , Geoffrey Tremont , Kunal Mankodiya , Elijah Castillo , Shehjar Sadhu , Dhaval Solanki , Jennifer D. Davis , Seth A. Margolis
{"title":"Stigma intersectionality and its impact on an epilepsy stigma self-management program","authors":"Sarah Prieto ,&nbsp;Elaine T. Kiriakopoulos ,&nbsp;Allyson Goldstein ,&nbsp;Sarah Kaden ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Tremont ,&nbsp;Kunal Mankodiya ,&nbsp;Elijah Castillo ,&nbsp;Shehjar Sadhu ,&nbsp;Dhaval Solanki ,&nbsp;Jennifer D. Davis ,&nbsp;Seth A. Margolis","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Perceived stigma is a common and distressing experience among people with epilepsy (PWE), particularly those with additional marginalized identities. Our team developed RISE ABOVE, a self-paced online stigma self-management program, to reduce stigma-related distress. This secondary analysis of pilot data examined how intersecting stigmas (i.e., additional stigmas beyond epilepsy) influence perceptions of RISE ABOVE’s credibility, expectations for change, user satisfaction, and psychosocial outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Twenty PWE from 13 U.S. states completed RISE ABOVE. Participants were diverse (Mean age = 47.3 ± 14.3 years; BIPOC = 30 %; bilingual = 30 %; unemployed = 30 %; female = 50 %; seizures uncontrolled = 50 %), with 12–18 years of education. All but one reported stigma beyond epilepsy (Median = 2.5 additional stigmas, IQR = 1–3.75). Credibility and expectations were assessed with each module; satisfaction was measured post-program. Psychosocial outcomes—including perceived stress, self-efficacy, rejection, loneliness, epilepsy stigma, and social role satisfaction—were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and six-months. Analyses included Pearson correlations and paired t-tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Credibility ratings were similar across groups, though expectations for change were higher among those with fewer intersecting stigmas. Medium-to-large improvements (Hedges’ <em>g</em> = 0.57–1.15) were observed in stress, social satisfaction, rejection, and epilepsy stigma. Self-efficacy only improved among those with lower stigma intersectionality. At follow-up, most gains were maintained, but reduced loneliness and improved social role satisfaction were limited to those with fewer intersecting stigma.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RISE ABOVE is a promising intervention. However, tailored adaptations may enhance its utility for PWE confronting multiple stigmatized identities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 110682"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025004226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Perceived stigma is a common and distressing experience among people with epilepsy (PWE), particularly those with additional marginalized identities. Our team developed RISE ABOVE, a self-paced online stigma self-management program, to reduce stigma-related distress. This secondary analysis of pilot data examined how intersecting stigmas (i.e., additional stigmas beyond epilepsy) influence perceptions of RISE ABOVE’s credibility, expectations for change, user satisfaction, and psychosocial outcomes.

Materials and Methods

Twenty PWE from 13 U.S. states completed RISE ABOVE. Participants were diverse (Mean age = 47.3 ± 14.3 years; BIPOC = 30 %; bilingual = 30 %; unemployed = 30 %; female = 50 %; seizures uncontrolled = 50 %), with 12–18 years of education. All but one reported stigma beyond epilepsy (Median = 2.5 additional stigmas, IQR = 1–3.75). Credibility and expectations were assessed with each module; satisfaction was measured post-program. Psychosocial outcomes—including perceived stress, self-efficacy, rejection, loneliness, epilepsy stigma, and social role satisfaction—were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and six-months. Analyses included Pearson correlations and paired t-tests.

Results

Credibility ratings were similar across groups, though expectations for change were higher among those with fewer intersecting stigmas. Medium-to-large improvements (Hedges’ g = 0.57–1.15) were observed in stress, social satisfaction, rejection, and epilepsy stigma. Self-efficacy only improved among those with lower stigma intersectionality. At follow-up, most gains were maintained, but reduced loneliness and improved social role satisfaction were limited to those with fewer intersecting stigma.

Conclusions

RISE ABOVE is a promising intervention. However, tailored adaptations may enhance its utility for PWE confronting multiple stigmatized identities.
病耻感交叉性及其对癫痫病耻感自我管理项目的影响
在癫痫患者(PWE)中,尤其是那些具有额外边缘化身份的人,感知到的耻辱是一种常见和痛苦的经历。我们的团队开发了RISE ABOVE,一个自定进度的在线耻辱自我管理程序,以减少与耻辱相关的痛苦。对试点数据的二次分析检查了交叉污名(即癫痫之外的其他污名)如何影响对RISE ABOVE的可信度、对变革的期望、用户满意度和社会心理结果的看法。材料和方法来自美国13个州的20名PWE完成了RISE ABOVE。参与者年龄分布多样(平均年龄47.3±14.3岁,BIPOC = 30%,双语= 30%,失业= 30%,女性= 50%,癫痫控制不全= 50%),受教育程度12-18年。除一例外,其余均报道了癫痫以外的柱头(中位数= 2.5个额外柱头,IQR = 1-3.75)。通过每个模块评估可信度和期望;满意度在项目结束后测量。心理社会结果——包括感知压力、自我效能、排斥、孤独、癫痫病耻感和社会角色满意度——在基线、干预后和6个月进行评估。分析包括Pearson相关性和配对t检验。结果不同群体的可信度评分相似,尽管对改变的期望在那些交叉污名较少的群体中更高。在压力、社会满意度、排斥和癫痫病耻感方面观察到中等到较大的改善(Hedges ' g = 0.57-1.15)。自我效能感仅在污名交叉性较低的患者中得到改善。在随访中,大多数的收益保持不变,但孤独感的减少和社会角色满意度的提高仅限于那些较少交叉污名的人。结论rise ABOVE是一种很有前景的干预措施。然而,量身定制的适应可能会增强其在面对多重污名化身份的PWE中的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信