{"title":"Labor migration, economic growth, and welfare inequality: A quantitative analysis of China","authors":"Cao-Yuan Ma , Xiu-Feng Ni , Ting-Rui Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecosys.2025.101291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how differing migration restrictions for labor with heterogeneous skills affect economic development and welfare inequality in China. Combining micro individual data with a general equilibrium<span> model that includes skilled and unskilled workers, endogenous productivity, and housing supply, we quantify the differing migration costs for skilled and unskilled workers and its consequences. The findings reveal that unskilled workers’ interprovincial migration cost is much higher than that of skilled workers, resulting in a 1.286 % output loss and widening economic disparity by 3.996 %, causing the interprovincial income gap to expand by 5.929 % and expanding the income gap between skilled and unskilled workers by 0.059 %. Regarding skill heterogeneity, facilitating the smooth interprovincial migration of unskilled workers can produce more significant and positive output and welfare effects compared with skilled workers. Across China’s regions, rationalizing the proportion of skilled and unskilled workers and improving the complementarity between skilled and unskilled workers would help optimize the spatial allocation of workers and enhance the output and welfare effects of labor migration. Therefore, eliminating the exclusion of unskilled workers and guiding the rational and orderly migration of skilled and unskilled workers will promote output growth, narrow the economic gap, and improve workers’ welfare, narrowing the welfare gap and establishing a mutually beneficial outcome of efficiency and fairness.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":51505,"journal":{"name":"Economic Systems","volume":"49 3","pages":"Article 101291"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Systems","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362525000032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines how differing migration restrictions for labor with heterogeneous skills affect economic development and welfare inequality in China. Combining micro individual data with a general equilibrium model that includes skilled and unskilled workers, endogenous productivity, and housing supply, we quantify the differing migration costs for skilled and unskilled workers and its consequences. The findings reveal that unskilled workers’ interprovincial migration cost is much higher than that of skilled workers, resulting in a 1.286 % output loss and widening economic disparity by 3.996 %, causing the interprovincial income gap to expand by 5.929 % and expanding the income gap between skilled and unskilled workers by 0.059 %. Regarding skill heterogeneity, facilitating the smooth interprovincial migration of unskilled workers can produce more significant and positive output and welfare effects compared with skilled workers. Across China’s regions, rationalizing the proportion of skilled and unskilled workers and improving the complementarity between skilled and unskilled workers would help optimize the spatial allocation of workers and enhance the output and welfare effects of labor migration. Therefore, eliminating the exclusion of unskilled workers and guiding the rational and orderly migration of skilled and unskilled workers will promote output growth, narrow the economic gap, and improve workers’ welfare, narrowing the welfare gap and establishing a mutually beneficial outcome of efficiency and fairness.
期刊介绍:
Economic Systems is a refereed journal for the analysis of causes and consequences of the significant institutional variety prevailing among developed, developing, and emerging economies, as well as attempts at and proposals for their reform. The journal is open to micro and macro contributions, theoretical as well as empirical, the latter to analyze related topics against the background of country or region-specific experiences. In this respect, Economic Systems retains its long standing interest in the emerging economies of Central and Eastern Europe and other former transition economies, but also encourages contributions that cover any part of the world, including Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, or Africa.