An integrated approach to optimal siting of air quality monitoring networks: Fuzzy based decision-making, multi-pollutant methodology, and health risk assessment

IF 6.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Nima Zolfaghari , Ahmad Alahabadi , Mehri Delsouz , Hamed Adab
{"title":"An integrated approach to optimal siting of air quality monitoring networks: Fuzzy based decision-making, multi-pollutant methodology, and health risk assessment","authors":"Nima Zolfaghari ,&nbsp;Ahmad Alahabadi ,&nbsp;Mehri Delsouz ,&nbsp;Hamed Adab","doi":"10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study is optimal siting of air quality monitoring networks (types A, B, and C) using fuzzy based multi-criteria decision-making and multi-pollutant methodology. Digital Glob and Landsat 8 satellites from Google Earth and Stichmap were used. After pre-processing, automobiles (QuickBird images), green space (NDVI), asphalt, buildings, and ground classes were separated. The produced layers were combined on the basis of the weight gained from Easy AHP. The weight of all criteria was combined by WLC method. In the fuzzy method, by selecting the fuzzy function and applying its middle point for each parameter in its raster layer in QGIS, the maps needed to locate the desired areas of stations were obtained. Based on investigated methods, as well as field visits, 10 priority points were proposed for air quality stations. The <em>Z</em>-score and <em>p</em>-value in nearest neighbor average method for fuzzy method (1.76 and 0.007) and AHP method (0.43 and 0.15) showed that the fuzzy method has the best pattern with99 % confidence in the distribution of the proposed points. Multi-pollutant methodology using XLSTAT and Map Algebra extension showed a good relationship of pollutants with layers of industrial units, commercial density, and vehicle density and suggests that most of the proposed stations in both methods with a priority of 1 to 10 are located in polluted areas of the city. The report of high pollution in the present study in some locations shows that the establishment of air quality measurement stations in Sabzevar city is a necessity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48626,"journal":{"name":"Urban Climate","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 102588"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Climate","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212095525003049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is optimal siting of air quality monitoring networks (types A, B, and C) using fuzzy based multi-criteria decision-making and multi-pollutant methodology. Digital Glob and Landsat 8 satellites from Google Earth and Stichmap were used. After pre-processing, automobiles (QuickBird images), green space (NDVI), asphalt, buildings, and ground classes were separated. The produced layers were combined on the basis of the weight gained from Easy AHP. The weight of all criteria was combined by WLC method. In the fuzzy method, by selecting the fuzzy function and applying its middle point for each parameter in its raster layer in QGIS, the maps needed to locate the desired areas of stations were obtained. Based on investigated methods, as well as field visits, 10 priority points were proposed for air quality stations. The Z-score and p-value in nearest neighbor average method for fuzzy method (1.76 and 0.007) and AHP method (0.43 and 0.15) showed that the fuzzy method has the best pattern with99 % confidence in the distribution of the proposed points. Multi-pollutant methodology using XLSTAT and Map Algebra extension showed a good relationship of pollutants with layers of industrial units, commercial density, and vehicle density and suggests that most of the proposed stations in both methods with a priority of 1 to 10 are located in polluted areas of the city. The report of high pollution in the present study in some locations shows that the establishment of air quality measurement stations in Sabzevar city is a necessity.
空气质量监测网络优化选址的综合方法:模糊决策、多污染物方法学和健康风险评估
本研究的目的是利用基于模糊的多准则决策和多污染物方法对空气质量监测网络(A、B和C类)进行优化选址。使用了谷歌Earth和Stichmap的Digital Glob和Landsat 8卫星。经过预处理后,将汽车(QuickBird图像)、绿地(NDVI)、沥青、建筑物和地面分类分开。根据Easy AHP法得到的权重进行分层组合。采用WLC法对各指标的权重进行组合。在模糊方法中,通过选择模糊函数,并将其栅格层中各参数的中间点应用于QGIS中,得到定位站点所需区域所需的地图。根据调查方法和实地考察,提出了空气质量站的10个优先点。模糊法的z得分和p值分别为1.76和0.007,AHP法的z得分和p值分别为0.43和0.15,表明模糊法对建议点的分布具有最佳的模式,置信度为99%。使用XLSTAT和Map Algebra扩展的多污染物方法显示污染物与工业单元层、商业密度和车辆密度之间的良好关系,并表明两种方法中优先级为1 ~ 10的大多数建议站点位于城市的污染区域。目前研究报告的一些地点的高污染表明,在Sabzevar市建立空气质量监测站是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urban Climate
Urban Climate Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: Urban Climate serves the scientific and decision making communities with the publication of research on theory, science and applications relevant to understanding urban climatic conditions and change in relation to their geography and to demographic, socioeconomic, institutional, technological and environmental dynamics and global change. Targeted towards both disciplinary and interdisciplinary audiences, this journal publishes original research papers, comprehensive review articles, book reviews, and short communications on topics including, but not limited to, the following: Urban meteorology and climate[...] Urban environmental pollution[...] Adaptation to global change[...] Urban economic and social issues[...] Research Approaches[...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信