The Enemies of Reliable and Useful Clinical Prediction Models: A Review of Statistical and Scientific Challenges

IF 8.7 1区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Ben Van Calster, Maarten van Smeden, Wouter van Amsterdam, Maarten Coemans, Laure Wynants, Ewout W. Steyerberg
{"title":"The Enemies of Reliable and Useful Clinical Prediction Models: A Review of Statistical and Scientific Challenges","authors":"Ben Van Calster, Maarten van Smeden, Wouter van Amsterdam, Maarten Coemans, Laure Wynants, Ewout W. Steyerberg","doi":"10.1146/annurev-statistics-042324-123749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current status of applied clinical prediction modeling is poor. Many models are developed with suboptimal methods and are not evaluated, and hence have little impact on clinical care. We review 12 challenges—provocatively labeled enemies—that jeopardize the creation of prediction models that make it to clinical practice to improve treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for individual patients. The challenges cover four areas: context, data, design and analysis, and scientific culture. We provide negative examples and recommendations for improvement, but also highlight positive examples and developments. Greater awareness of the complexities surrounding clinical prediction modeling is needed among researchers, funding agencies, health professionals as end users, and all of us as potential patients. To improve the utility of prediction models for healthcare and society, we need fewer but better models as well as more resources for model validation, impact assessment, and implementation.","PeriodicalId":48855,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-042324-123749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current status of applied clinical prediction modeling is poor. Many models are developed with suboptimal methods and are not evaluated, and hence have little impact on clinical care. We review 12 challenges—provocatively labeled enemies—that jeopardize the creation of prediction models that make it to clinical practice to improve treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for individual patients. The challenges cover four areas: context, data, design and analysis, and scientific culture. We provide negative examples and recommendations for improvement, but also highlight positive examples and developments. Greater awareness of the complexities surrounding clinical prediction modeling is needed among researchers, funding agencies, health professionals as end users, and all of us as potential patients. To improve the utility of prediction models for healthcare and society, we need fewer but better models as well as more resources for model validation, impact assessment, and implementation.
可靠和有用的临床预测模型的敌人:对统计和科学挑战的回顾
目前临床应用预测建模的现状较差。许多模型是用次优方法开发的,没有进行评估,因此对临床护理影响不大。我们回顾了12个挑战-具有挑衅性的标记敌人-危及预测模型的创建,使其能够用于临床实践,以改善个体患者的治疗决策和临床结果。挑战包括四个方面:环境、数据、设计和分析以及科学文化。我们提供消极的例子和改进建议,但也强调积极的例子和发展。研究人员、资助机构、作为最终用户的卫生专业人员以及作为潜在患者的我们所有人都需要对临床预测建模的复杂性有更多的认识。为了提高医疗保健和社会预测模型的效用,我们需要更少但更好的模型,以及用于模型验证、影响评估和实现的更多资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application publishes comprehensive review articles focusing on methodological advancements in statistics and the utilization of computational tools facilitating these advancements. It is abstracted and indexed in Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Inspec.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信