Decoding Soil Constraints in Queensland, Australia: Strategies for Precision Management to Enhance Crop Productivity

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tong Li, Lizhen Cui, Bernhard Wehr, Yunru Lai, Hongdou Liu, Cong He, Caixian Tang, Vilim Filipović, Ranjay K. Singh, Timothy I. McLaren, Ram C. Dalal, Yash P. Dang
{"title":"Decoding Soil Constraints in Queensland, Australia: Strategies for Precision Management to Enhance Crop Productivity","authors":"Tong Li, Lizhen Cui, Bernhard Wehr, Yunru Lai, Hongdou Liu, Cong He, Caixian Tang, Vilim Filipović, Ranjay K. Singh, Timothy I. McLaren, Ram C. Dalal, Yash P. Dang","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil constraints significantly impact crop productivity, yet their direct relationships to yield remain unclear. This limits the development of targeted soil management strategies for improving agricultural output. This study aims to clarify the influence of key soil constraints on crop productivity by examining soil chemical indicators across distinct productivity zones in Queensland. Soil samples were collected from 21 farms across three productivity zones (consistently low, inconsistent, and consistently high) and five soil layers (D1–D5, 0–10, 10–30, 30–60, 60–90, and 90–120 cm). We utilized the Constraint ID tool alongside mixed‐effects models, principal component analysis (PCA), and machine learning to evaluate indicators including nitrate (NO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub><jats:sup>−</jats:sup>), electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECe), pH, chloride (Cl), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and exchangeable cations (Ca, K, and Mg). This integrated approach—among the first in Queensland—enabled depth‐specific and spatially explicit analysis of soil constraint impacts. ECe, pH, Cl, and ESP are critical factors influencing soil fertility, particularly in subsoil layers (D3–D5). Low‐yielding zones (Zone L) exhibited high pH (up to 8.41), Cl (up to 151 mg/kg), ESP (up to 8.64), and ECe (exceeding 4 dS/m), indicating salinity, alkalinity, and sodicity issues. These subsoil constraints are difficult to remediate, highlighting the need for surface‐level strategies that support whole‐profile soil health. This study underscores the necessity of site‐specific, surface‐focused interventions that address constraints across the entire soil profile. The findings offer actionable insights for tailoring soil management and support regional decision‐making to optimize crop yields in Queensland's agricultural systems.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil constraints significantly impact crop productivity, yet their direct relationships to yield remain unclear. This limits the development of targeted soil management strategies for improving agricultural output. This study aims to clarify the influence of key soil constraints on crop productivity by examining soil chemical indicators across distinct productivity zones in Queensland. Soil samples were collected from 21 farms across three productivity zones (consistently low, inconsistent, and consistently high) and five soil layers (D1–D5, 0–10, 10–30, 30–60, 60–90, and 90–120 cm). We utilized the Constraint ID tool alongside mixed‐effects models, principal component analysis (PCA), and machine learning to evaluate indicators including nitrate (NO3), electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECe), pH, chloride (Cl), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and exchangeable cations (Ca, K, and Mg). This integrated approach—among the first in Queensland—enabled depth‐specific and spatially explicit analysis of soil constraint impacts. ECe, pH, Cl, and ESP are critical factors influencing soil fertility, particularly in subsoil layers (D3–D5). Low‐yielding zones (Zone L) exhibited high pH (up to 8.41), Cl (up to 151 mg/kg), ESP (up to 8.64), and ECe (exceeding 4 dS/m), indicating salinity, alkalinity, and sodicity issues. These subsoil constraints are difficult to remediate, highlighting the need for surface‐level strategies that support whole‐profile soil health. This study underscores the necessity of site‐specific, surface‐focused interventions that address constraints across the entire soil profile. The findings offer actionable insights for tailoring soil management and support regional decision‐making to optimize crop yields in Queensland's agricultural systems.
解码土壤限制在昆士兰,澳大利亚:战略的精确管理,以提高作物生产力
土壤约束显著影响作物生产力,但其与产量的直接关系尚不清楚。这限制了为提高农业产量而制定有针对性的土壤管理战略。本研究旨在通过检查昆士兰州不同生产力区的土壤化学指标,阐明关键土壤约束对作物生产力的影响。土壤样本采集自21个农场,分布在3个生产力区(持续低、不一致和持续高)和5个土层(D1-D5、0-10、10-30、30-60、60-90和90-120 cm)。我们利用约束ID工具以及混合效应模型、主成分分析(PCA)和机器学习来评估包括硝酸盐(NO3−)、饱和土壤萃取物(ECe)的电导率、pH、氯化物(Cl)、可交换钠百分比(ESP)和可交换阳离子(Ca、K和Mg)在内的指标。这种综合方法是昆士兰的第一个方法,可以对土壤约束影响进行深度特定和空间明确的分析。ECe、pH、Cl和ESP是影响土壤肥力的关键因素,特别是在地下土层(D3-D5)。低产区(L区)表现出高pH值(高达8.41)、高Cl(高达151 mg/kg)、高ESP(高达8.64)和高ECe(超过4 dS/m),表明存在盐度、碱度和碱度问题。这些底土约束很难修复,因此需要采用支持全剖面土壤健康的表层策略。这项研究强调了在整个土壤剖面上针对特定地点、以表面为重点的干预措施的必要性。研究结果为定制土壤管理和支持区域决策提供了可行的见解,以优化昆士兰农业系统的作物产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信