Correlation Between MRI and Histopathology in Assessing Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

IF 1.9 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Cancer reports Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.70322
Pedram Fadavi, Kambiz Novin, Maryam Garousi, Amir Mohammad Arefpour, Seyedeh Shaghayegh Rezvani Nezhad, Mahshid Soori, Farzad Taghizadeh-Hesary
{"title":"Correlation Between MRI and Histopathology in Assessing Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer","authors":"Pedram Fadavi,&nbsp;Kambiz Novin,&nbsp;Maryam Garousi,&nbsp;Amir Mohammad Arefpour,&nbsp;Seyedeh Shaghayegh Rezvani Nezhad,&nbsp;Mahshid Soori,&nbsp;Farzad Taghizadeh-Hesary","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.70322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Recognizing the predictive factors of response to chemoradiation is of utmost importance in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The study is designed to explore the correlation between post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) pathologic and MR-based tumor staging in LARC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with non-metastatic LARC underwent contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI before and after treatment, received standard chemoradiation, and were evaluated for tumor response. Tumor regression grade (TRG) based on histopathology ranged from TRG0 to TRG3, while MR-based responses encompassed complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease. The primary endpoints were the correlation and agreement between post-nCRT histopathologic- and MR-based tumor staging. The secondary endpoints focused on predictive factors influencing the response to nCRT and assessing the effectiveness of MRI in identifying complete pathologic response (pCR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The analysis showed a strong positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.86, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) with moderate agreement (κ = 0.44) between post-nCRT MR- and histopathologic-based disease staging. According to multivariate analysis, initial tumor stage could predict clinical response to nCRT, and MR-based TRG could predict histopathologic response. MRI exhibited a specificity of 96.2%, sensitivity of 22.2%, positive predictive value of 50%, and negative predictive value of 88.1% in detecting pCR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The study highlights the promising role of MRI in assessing treatment response in LARC, guiding clinical decision-making and potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures to evaluate treatment effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":"8 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnr2.70322","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Recognizing the predictive factors of response to chemoradiation is of utmost importance in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The study is designed to explore the correlation between post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) pathologic and MR-based tumor staging in LARC.

Methods

Patients with non-metastatic LARC underwent contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI before and after treatment, received standard chemoradiation, and were evaluated for tumor response. Tumor regression grade (TRG) based on histopathology ranged from TRG0 to TRG3, while MR-based responses encompassed complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease. The primary endpoints were the correlation and agreement between post-nCRT histopathologic- and MR-based tumor staging. The secondary endpoints focused on predictive factors influencing the response to nCRT and assessing the effectiveness of MRI in identifying complete pathologic response (pCR).

Results

The analysis showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.86, p < 0.001) with moderate agreement (κ = 0.44) between post-nCRT MR- and histopathologic-based disease staging. According to multivariate analysis, initial tumor stage could predict clinical response to nCRT, and MR-based TRG could predict histopathologic response. MRI exhibited a specificity of 96.2%, sensitivity of 22.2%, positive predictive value of 50%, and negative predictive value of 88.1% in detecting pCR.

Conclusions

The study highlights the promising role of MRI in assessing treatment response in LARC, guiding clinical decision-making and potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures to evaluate treatment effectiveness.

Abstract Image

评价局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗治疗反应的MRI与组织病理学的相关性
背景与目的认识局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者放化疗反应的预测因素至关重要。本研究旨在探讨LARC术后新辅助放化疗(nCRT)病理与mr肿瘤分期的相关性。方法非转移性LARC患者在治疗前后行盆腔造影增强MRI,接受标准放化疗,并评估肿瘤反应。基于组织病理学的肿瘤消退等级(TRG)从TRG0到TRG3不等,而基于mr的反应包括完全缓解、部分缓解、疾病稳定和疾病进展。主要终点是ncrt后组织病理学和磁共振肿瘤分期之间的相关性和一致性。次要终点集中在影响nCRT反应的预测因素和评估MRI在识别完全病理反应(pCR)方面的有效性。结果分析显示,ncrt后MR与基于组织病理学的疾病分期呈正相关(r = 0.86, p < 0.001),且有一定程度的一致性(κ = 0.44)。多因素分析显示,肿瘤初始分期可以预测nCRT的临床反应,基于mr的TRG可以预测组织病理反应。MRI检测pCR特异性为96.2%,敏感性为22.2%,阳性预测值为50%,阴性预测值为88.1%。结论本研究强调了MRI在评估LARC治疗反应、指导临床决策以及潜在地减少对侵入性手术评估治疗效果的需要方面的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信