Using Scenarios for Reducing Uncertainties in Biodiversity Conservation: From Global Targets to European Steppes

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Cristian Pérez-Granados, Bernd Lenzner, Mario Díaz, Ana Benítez-López, Ana T. Marques, Rocío Tarjuelo, Julia Gómez-Catasús, Núria Roura-Pascual, Matthias Vögeli, Francisco Valera, Radovan Václav, Piotr Tryjanowski, Juan Traba, Andrea Santangeli, Gema Ruiz Jiménez, Natalia Revilla-Martín, Francois Mougeot, Francisco Moreira, Manuel B. Morales, Santi Mañosa, Germán M. López-Iborra, Guillaume Latombe, Marina Golivets, Elena D. Concepción, Xabier Cabodevilla, Lluís Brotons, Carolina Bravo, Mattia Brambilla, Gerard Bota, Luis Bolonio, Beatriz Arroyo, Julia Zurdo, João Paulo Silva, David Serrano, Ana Sanz-Pérez, Iván Salgado, Martin Šálek, Pedro Sáez-Gómez, Margarita Reverter, Alejandro Onrubia, Pedro P. Olea, Boris Nikolov, Carlos A. Martín, Gabriel López-Poveda, Antonio Leiva, David Giralt, Tiago Crispim-Mendes, Fabián Casas, Daniel Bustillo-de la Rosa, Adrián Barrero, João Gameiro
{"title":"Using Scenarios for Reducing Uncertainties in Biodiversity Conservation: From Global Targets to European Steppes","authors":"Cristian Pérez-Granados,&nbsp;Bernd Lenzner,&nbsp;Mario Díaz,&nbsp;Ana Benítez-López,&nbsp;Ana T. Marques,&nbsp;Rocío Tarjuelo,&nbsp;Julia Gómez-Catasús,&nbsp;Núria Roura-Pascual,&nbsp;Matthias Vögeli,&nbsp;Francisco Valera,&nbsp;Radovan Václav,&nbsp;Piotr Tryjanowski,&nbsp;Juan Traba,&nbsp;Andrea Santangeli,&nbsp;Gema Ruiz Jiménez,&nbsp;Natalia Revilla-Martín,&nbsp;Francois Mougeot,&nbsp;Francisco Moreira,&nbsp;Manuel B. Morales,&nbsp;Santi Mañosa,&nbsp;Germán M. López-Iborra,&nbsp;Guillaume Latombe,&nbsp;Marina Golivets,&nbsp;Elena D. Concepción,&nbsp;Xabier Cabodevilla,&nbsp;Lluís Brotons,&nbsp;Carolina Bravo,&nbsp;Mattia Brambilla,&nbsp;Gerard Bota,&nbsp;Luis Bolonio,&nbsp;Beatriz Arroyo,&nbsp;Julia Zurdo,&nbsp;João Paulo Silva,&nbsp;David Serrano,&nbsp;Ana Sanz-Pérez,&nbsp;Iván Salgado,&nbsp;Martin Šálek,&nbsp;Pedro Sáez-Gómez,&nbsp;Margarita Reverter,&nbsp;Alejandro Onrubia,&nbsp;Pedro P. Olea,&nbsp;Boris Nikolov,&nbsp;Carlos A. Martín,&nbsp;Gabriel López-Poveda,&nbsp;Antonio Leiva,&nbsp;David Giralt,&nbsp;Tiago Crispim-Mendes,&nbsp;Fabián Casas,&nbsp;Daniel Bustillo-de la Rosa,&nbsp;Adrián Barrero,&nbsp;João Gameiro","doi":"10.1111/conl.13138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scenario analysis allows assessing how complex socio-ecological systems might respond to different policy pathways. We used an expert-based participatory approach to explore how four different European socio-ecological scenarios could impact (1) the implementation of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KM-GBF) and (2) the achievement of priority conservation actions for safeguarding European steppe ecosystems. KM-GBF targets were expected to be met only under the scenario with increased commitment for sustainable development goals and global cooperation, but hardly achievable under the most environment-adverse and resource-demanding scenarios. Integrating different views from these scenarios, we identified six overarching recommendations for the conservation of European steppe ecosystems, including improving public awareness, empowering local communities, and promoting the engagement of private companies into conservation planning. Our approach identifies how socioeconomic drivers influence the success of the KM-GBF and the conservation of European steppes, providing a range of general conservation actions structured and prioritized to be effective under a wide range of likely future developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.13138","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scenario analysis allows assessing how complex socio-ecological systems might respond to different policy pathways. We used an expert-based participatory approach to explore how four different European socio-ecological scenarios could impact (1) the implementation of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KM-GBF) and (2) the achievement of priority conservation actions for safeguarding European steppe ecosystems. KM-GBF targets were expected to be met only under the scenario with increased commitment for sustainable development goals and global cooperation, but hardly achievable under the most environment-adverse and resource-demanding scenarios. Integrating different views from these scenarios, we identified six overarching recommendations for the conservation of European steppe ecosystems, including improving public awareness, empowering local communities, and promoting the engagement of private companies into conservation planning. Our approach identifies how socioeconomic drivers influence the success of the KM-GBF and the conservation of European steppes, providing a range of general conservation actions structured and prioritized to be effective under a wide range of likely future developments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用情景减少生物多样性保护的不确定性:从全球目标到欧洲草原
情景分析允许评估复杂的社会生态系统如何对不同的政策路径作出反应。我们采用基于专家的参与式方法,探讨了四种不同的欧洲社会生态情景如何影响(1)昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架(KM-GBF)的实施和(2)保护欧洲草原生态系统的优先保护行动的实现。预计KM-GBF目标只有在对可持续发展目标和全球合作的承诺增加的情况下才能实现,但在最不利环境和资源需求最大的情况下很难实现。综合这些情景的不同观点,我们确定了保护欧洲草原生态系统的六项总体建议,包括提高公众意识,赋予当地社区权力,促进私营公司参与保护规划。我们的方法确定了社会经济驱动因素如何影响KM-GBF和欧洲草原保护的成功,提供了一系列总体保护行动的结构和优先顺序,以便在未来广泛的可能发展下有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信