Voluntary activation of the ankle plantar flexors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Molly E. Coventry , Christopher Latella , Brady Green , Andrea B. Mosler , Jayden Peak , Maria Luciana Perez Armendariz , Ebonie K. Rio , Myles C. Murphy
{"title":"Voluntary activation of the ankle plantar flexors: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Molly E. Coventry ,&nbsp;Christopher Latella ,&nbsp;Brady Green ,&nbsp;Andrea B. Mosler ,&nbsp;Jayden Peak ,&nbsp;Maria Luciana Perez Armendariz ,&nbsp;Ebonie K. Rio ,&nbsp;Myles C. Murphy","doi":"10.1016/j.jsampl.2025.100117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Voluntary activation is a measure of neural drive, typically measured during maximal contractions, and provides insight into motor function. This systematic review examined voluntary activation assessment of the ankle plantar flexors in healthy and pathological populations, and the association of participant age and positioning (knee and ankle joint angles) with voluntary activation level.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted. Six electronic databases were systematically searched for studies that assessed voluntary activation of the ankle plantar flexors using the interpolated twitch technique or the central activation ratio. Meta-analyses were performed using an inverse variance, random-effects maximal likelihood model of continuous outcomes within SPSS Statistics, and subsequent meta-regression performed for age, knee angle and ankle angle. Methodological quality was assessed using the Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies Checklist from the Joanna Briggs Institute.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 74 studies were included, 5 included participants with pathological conditions (2 Achilles tendinopathy and 3 stroke) and 69 included only healthy participants. The meta-analysis demonstrated plantar flexion voluntary activation levels for healthy populations of 91 %, 90 % for Achilles tendinopathy and 35 % for stroke. Older age was associated with lower voluntary activation (β ​= ​−0.072; p ​= ​0.035) and greater knee flexion angle was associated with higher voluntary activation (β ​= ​−0.033; p ​= ​0.045). No association of voluntary activation and ankle position was demonstrated (β ​= ​−0.070, p ​= ​0.488). Majority of the included studies were judged to have low methodological quality (97 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Voluntary activation was comparable between healthy participants and Achilles tendinopathy, and significantly lower in people following stroke. Age and knee joint position but not ankle joint position was associated with the level of plantar flexor voluntary activation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74029,"journal":{"name":"JSAMS plus","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSAMS plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772696725000316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Voluntary activation is a measure of neural drive, typically measured during maximal contractions, and provides insight into motor function. This systematic review examined voluntary activation assessment of the ankle plantar flexors in healthy and pathological populations, and the association of participant age and positioning (knee and ankle joint angles) with voluntary activation level.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted. Six electronic databases were systematically searched for studies that assessed voluntary activation of the ankle plantar flexors using the interpolated twitch technique or the central activation ratio. Meta-analyses were performed using an inverse variance, random-effects maximal likelihood model of continuous outcomes within SPSS Statistics, and subsequent meta-regression performed for age, knee angle and ankle angle. Methodological quality was assessed using the Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies Checklist from the Joanna Briggs Institute.

Results

A total of 74 studies were included, 5 included participants with pathological conditions (2 Achilles tendinopathy and 3 stroke) and 69 included only healthy participants. The meta-analysis demonstrated plantar flexion voluntary activation levels for healthy populations of 91 %, 90 % for Achilles tendinopathy and 35 % for stroke. Older age was associated with lower voluntary activation (β ​= ​−0.072; p ​= ​0.035) and greater knee flexion angle was associated with higher voluntary activation (β ​= ​−0.033; p ​= ​0.045). No association of voluntary activation and ankle position was demonstrated (β ​= ​−0.070, p ​= ​0.488). Majority of the included studies were judged to have low methodological quality (97 %).

Conclusions

Voluntary activation was comparable between healthy participants and Achilles tendinopathy, and significantly lower in people following stroke. Age and knee joint position but not ankle joint position was associated with the level of plantar flexor voluntary activation.
自主激活足底屈肌:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
自愿激活是一种神经驱动的测量,通常在最大收缩时测量,并提供对运动功能的洞察。本系统综述检查了健康和病理人群踝关节底屈肌的自主激活评估,以及参与者年龄和体位(膝关节和踝关节角度)与自主激活水平的关系。方法进行系统评价和荟萃分析。系统地检索了六个电子数据库,以评估使用内插抽动技术或中枢激活比的踝关节足底屈肌的自主激活。meta分析采用SPSS统计中连续结果的逆方差、随机效应最大似然模型进行,随后对年龄、膝关节角度和踝关节角度进行meta回归。方法质量采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的分析横断面研究检查表进行评估。结果共纳入74项研究,5项研究纳入病理状态(2例跟腱病和3例卒中),69项研究仅纳入健康受试者。荟萃分析显示,健康人群的足底屈曲自发激活水平为91%,跟腱病患者为90%,中风患者为35%。年龄越大,自愿性活动越低(β = - 0.072; p = 0.035),膝关节屈曲角度越大,自愿性活动越高(β = - 0.033; p = 0.045)。自主活动与踝关节位置无关联(β = - 0.070, p = 0.488)。大多数纳入的研究被认为方法学质量较低(97%)。结论:自愿激活在健康参与者和跟腱病患者之间具有可比性,而在中风患者中明显较低。年龄和膝关节位置与足底屈肌自主激活水平相关,但踝关节位置与足底屈肌自主激活水平无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信