Cortical somatosensory responses evoked by orofacial skin stretch experimentally applied during speech movement planning in stuttering and nonstuttering adults

IF 2.9 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Elise LeBovidge , Takayuki Ito , Ludo Max
{"title":"Cortical somatosensory responses evoked by orofacial skin stretch experimentally applied during speech movement planning in stuttering and nonstuttering adults","authors":"Elise LeBovidge ,&nbsp;Takayuki Ito ,&nbsp;Ludo Max","doi":"10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.08.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prior findings indicate that individuals who stutter do not show the typical modulation of auditory processing that is observed during speech movement planning in nonstuttering speakers. We now ask whether this lack of planning-related sensory modulation in stuttering adults is specific to the auditory domain. In this first <em>somatosensory</em> study (15 stuttering and 15 nonstuttering participants), we implemented the prior stimulation timeline in a paradigm with orofacial skin stretch stimuli. A robotic device applied skin stretches to elicit somatosensory evoked potentials during speech movement planning and a silent reading control condition. We compared the N1 component for <em>Speaking</em> and <em>No-Speaking</em> to assess a possible influence of movement planning on somatosensory processing. Both groups showed clear N1 responses, consistent with prior validation of the skin stretch stimulation. However, for the selected timepoint of stimulation (i.e., identical to our auditory stimulation studies) we found no evidence of pre-speech somatosensory modulation in either group. There were no amplitude or latency differences between speaking and control conditions and no between-group differences. Given that even typical participants showed no modulation at the probed times during movement planning, whereas some studies have obtained evidence supporting somatosensory modulation for orofacial movements during speech movement execution, (a) the time course of modulation may differ from that observed for auditory stimuli, or (b) input from the specific facial mechanoreceptors stimulated here may be not subject to pre-speech modulation. Future studies should probe somatosensation at different timepoints before and after speech movement onset and in effectors actively performing the articulatory gestures (lip, tongue).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13195,"journal":{"name":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 568-577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667242125001344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior findings indicate that individuals who stutter do not show the typical modulation of auditory processing that is observed during speech movement planning in nonstuttering speakers. We now ask whether this lack of planning-related sensory modulation in stuttering adults is specific to the auditory domain. In this first somatosensory study (15 stuttering and 15 nonstuttering participants), we implemented the prior stimulation timeline in a paradigm with orofacial skin stretch stimuli. A robotic device applied skin stretches to elicit somatosensory evoked potentials during speech movement planning and a silent reading control condition. We compared the N1 component for Speaking and No-Speaking to assess a possible influence of movement planning on somatosensory processing. Both groups showed clear N1 responses, consistent with prior validation of the skin stretch stimulation. However, for the selected timepoint of stimulation (i.e., identical to our auditory stimulation studies) we found no evidence of pre-speech somatosensory modulation in either group. There were no amplitude or latency differences between speaking and control conditions and no between-group differences. Given that even typical participants showed no modulation at the probed times during movement planning, whereas some studies have obtained evidence supporting somatosensory modulation for orofacial movements during speech movement execution, (a) the time course of modulation may differ from that observed for auditory stimuli, or (b) input from the specific facial mechanoreceptors stimulated here may be not subject to pre-speech modulation. Future studies should probe somatosensation at different timepoints before and after speech movement onset and in effectors actively performing the articulatory gestures (lip, tongue).
口面部皮肤拉伸在口吃和非口吃成人言语运动规划中的诱发的皮质体感反应
先前的研究结果表明,口吃者并没有表现出非口吃者在言语运动规划过程中所观察到的典型的听觉处理调节。我们现在要问的是,口吃成人缺乏与计划相关的感觉调节是否只存在于听觉领域。在第一项体感研究中(15名口吃和15名非口吃参与者),我们在一个具有口面部皮肤拉伸刺激的范式中实施了先前的刺激时间。在言语运动计划和默读控制条件下,一种机器人装置应用皮肤拉伸来引发体感诱发电位。我们比较了说话和不说话的N1分量,以评估运动计划对躯体感觉加工的可能影响。两组均表现出明显的N1反应,与先前皮肤拉伸刺激的验证一致。然而,对于选择的刺激时间点(即与我们的听觉刺激研究相同),我们在两组中都没有发现言语前躯体感觉调节的证据。在说话和控制条件之间没有振幅或潜伏期差异,组间也没有差异。考虑到即使是典型的参与者在运动计划期间的探测时间也没有表现出调节,而一些研究已经获得证据支持在言语运动执行过程中对口面部运动进行体感调节,(a)调节的时间过程可能与听觉刺激时观察到的不同,或者(b)这里刺激的特定面部机械感受器的输入可能不受言语前调节。未来的研究应该在言语运动开始前后的不同时间点以及效应器积极执行发音手势(唇,舌)时探索体感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IBRO Neuroscience Reports
IBRO Neuroscience Reports Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信