Land-use change and lake eutrophication: Stakeholders’ perceptions on practices and policies in Ethiopia

IF 5.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Alemu Bezie Debay, Nandika Tsendbazar, Erika N. Speelman
{"title":"Land-use change and lake eutrophication: Stakeholders’ perceptions on practices and policies in Ethiopia","authors":"Alemu Bezie Debay,&nbsp;Nandika Tsendbazar,&nbsp;Erika N. Speelman","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding local land-use decisions and perceptions of land-use dynamics is essential for developing effective and sustainable resource management policies. However, the involvement of local communities in governance, policy development, and broader decision-making processes, especially in densely populated agricultural regions with intense competition for limited resources is often limited. Here, we assessed stakeholder perspectives on the drivers and consequences of land-use change in the Abaya-Chamo and Tana basins in Ethiopia, East Africa, with the goal of contributing to improved policy development. Using Q-methodology, 43 participants, including 22 smallholder farmers and 21 local decision-makers, sorted 30 statements, followed by in-depth interviews. The analysis identified three distinct perspectives: sustainable land-use advocates, economic-driven policy critics, and agricultural expansionists. Sustainable land-use advocates integrated ecological concerns with socioeconomic considerations; economic-driven policy critics prioritised economic outcomes while viewing land-use policies as ineffective; and agricultural expansionists emphasised maximising the economic use of land, lakes, and wetland resources. These groups showed marked disagreement over the economic use and management of lakes, wetlands, and non-forested lands. While some participants perceived farming as minimally linked to lake degradation, others emphasised the economic use of lakes and wetlands alongside an awareness of environmental impacts. A shared concern across all discourses was the negative view of forest to farmland conversion. Participants widely criticised current agricultural and conservation policies as ineffective or misaligned with local and agrological realities. This study identifies the heterogeneity of land-use perspectives across regions and stakeholders and shows the need for agroecologically grounded, region-specific policies and implementation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100880"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725003010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding local land-use decisions and perceptions of land-use dynamics is essential for developing effective and sustainable resource management policies. However, the involvement of local communities in governance, policy development, and broader decision-making processes, especially in densely populated agricultural regions with intense competition for limited resources is often limited. Here, we assessed stakeholder perspectives on the drivers and consequences of land-use change in the Abaya-Chamo and Tana basins in Ethiopia, East Africa, with the goal of contributing to improved policy development. Using Q-methodology, 43 participants, including 22 smallholder farmers and 21 local decision-makers, sorted 30 statements, followed by in-depth interviews. The analysis identified three distinct perspectives: sustainable land-use advocates, economic-driven policy critics, and agricultural expansionists. Sustainable land-use advocates integrated ecological concerns with socioeconomic considerations; economic-driven policy critics prioritised economic outcomes while viewing land-use policies as ineffective; and agricultural expansionists emphasised maximising the economic use of land, lakes, and wetland resources. These groups showed marked disagreement over the economic use and management of lakes, wetlands, and non-forested lands. While some participants perceived farming as minimally linked to lake degradation, others emphasised the economic use of lakes and wetlands alongside an awareness of environmental impacts. A shared concern across all discourses was the negative view of forest to farmland conversion. Participants widely criticised current agricultural and conservation policies as ineffective or misaligned with local and agrological realities. This study identifies the heterogeneity of land-use perspectives across regions and stakeholders and shows the need for agroecologically grounded, region-specific policies and implementation strategies.
土地利用变化和湖泊富营养化:埃塞俄比亚利益相关者对实践和政策的看法
了解当地的土地使用决定和对土地使用动态的认识对于制定有效和可持续的资源管理政策至关重要。然而,地方社区参与治理、政策制定和更广泛的决策过程,特别是在人口密集的农业地区,对有限资源的激烈竞争往往是有限的。在此,我们评估了利益相关者对东非埃塞俄比亚Abaya-Chamo和Tana流域土地利用变化的驱动因素和后果的看法,目的是为改善政策制定做出贡献。采用q -方法学,包括22名小农和21名地方决策者在内的43名参与者对30份陈述进行了分类,随后进行了深度访谈。该分析确定了三种不同的观点:可持续土地利用倡导者、经济驱动政策批评者和农业扩张主义者。可持续土地利用提倡将生态问题与社会经济考虑结合起来;经济驱动的政策批评者优先考虑经济结果,同时认为土地使用政策无效;农业扩张主义者强调最大限度地经济利用土地、湖泊和湿地资源。这些团体对湖泊、湿地和非林地的经济利用和管理表现出明显的分歧。虽然一些与会者认为农业与湖泊退化的关系最小,但其他人强调湖泊和湿地的经济利用以及对环境影响的认识。所有讨论的共同关切是对森林转为农田的负面看法。与会者普遍批评当前的农业和保护政策无效,或者与当地和农业现实脱节。本研究确定了各区域和各利益攸关方土地利用前景的异质性,并表明需要制定基于生态农业的区域特定政策和实施战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信