How professional knowledge and general cognitive abilities relate to pre-service teachers’ professional vision

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Christina Dückers , Bernadette Gold , Manfred Holodynski
{"title":"How professional knowledge and general cognitive abilities relate to pre-service teachers’ professional vision","authors":"Christina Dückers ,&nbsp;Bernadette Gold ,&nbsp;Manfred Holodynski","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Teachers’ professional vision as ability to notice and interpret relevant classroom events is based on professional knowledge. With regard to the circumvention-of-limits hypothesis, pre-service teachers’ professional vision might as well be conditioned by individual differences in their general cognitive abilities. We investigated the relationship between pre-service teachers’ professional vision and general cognitive abilities as well as whether their professional knowledge moderates this relationship (<em>N</em> = 91, thereof 49 bachelor and 42 master students). Regression analyses confirmed the hypothesized effect of professional knowledge on professional vision. Furthermore, only selective attention as part of general cognitive abilities predicted professional vision in open-response video-based tasks, while the moderation effect could not be corroborated. The findings confirm professional vision as knowledge-based process, but also underline that individual differences in general cognitive abilities might affect and need to be considered when addressing professional vision with video clips.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101970"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125002196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teachers’ professional vision as ability to notice and interpret relevant classroom events is based on professional knowledge. With regard to the circumvention-of-limits hypothesis, pre-service teachers’ professional vision might as well be conditioned by individual differences in their general cognitive abilities. We investigated the relationship between pre-service teachers’ professional vision and general cognitive abilities as well as whether their professional knowledge moderates this relationship (N = 91, thereof 49 bachelor and 42 master students). Regression analyses confirmed the hypothesized effect of professional knowledge on professional vision. Furthermore, only selective attention as part of general cognitive abilities predicted professional vision in open-response video-based tasks, while the moderation effect could not be corroborated. The findings confirm professional vision as knowledge-based process, but also underline that individual differences in general cognitive abilities might affect and need to be considered when addressing professional vision with video clips.
专业知识和一般认知能力与职前教师的专业愿景有何关系
教师的专业视野,即注意和解读相关课堂事件的能力,是以专业知识为基础的。就极限规避假说而言,职前教师的专业视野也可能受到其一般认知能力的个体差异的制约。我们调查了职前教师专业愿景与一般认知能力的关系,以及专业知识是否在这种关系中起调节作用(N = 91,其中本科49名,硕士42名)。回归分析证实了专业知识对职业愿景的影响。此外,只有选择性注意作为一般认知能力的一部分,才能预测开放式反应视频任务中的专业视力,而调节效应无法得到证实。研究结果证实了专业视觉是一个以知识为基础的过程,但也强调了一般认知能力的个体差异可能会影响,在用视频剪辑处理专业视觉时需要考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信