Bridging policy and practice: A review of monitoring, control, and surveillance in managing illegal fishing in India

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Abhishek Dudi , Claire Collins , Ana Nuno , Divya Karnad
{"title":"Bridging policy and practice: A review of monitoring, control, and surveillance in managing illegal fishing in India","authors":"Abhishek Dudi ,&nbsp;Claire Collins ,&nbsp;Ana Nuno ,&nbsp;Divya Karnad","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With increasing pressure on marine ecosystems, effective Monitoring, Control, and Surveillance (MCS) measures are critical in managing Illegal, Unregulated, and Unreported (IUU) fishing. While this is a challenge faced globally, the Indian Ocean region presents a particularly compelling case due to its globally important ecological and economic role. Despite policy frameworks aimed at strengthening MCS, the practical implementation of these measures remains inconsistent across countries, posing challenges to reduce IUU fishing. We conducted a scoping review of MCS-related policies and their implementation within India. We reviewed documents (i.e. National policies &amp; bills, international agreements, Maritime agreements, etc.) related to national and Kerala state policy, compared them with international standards, and finally explored their implementation by gathering available online evidence. Despite the adoption of technologies such as biometric identification cards, online registration platforms, and satellite-based communication systems, our findings reveal major gaps between the policy framework and its implementation. Some measures, including Automatic Identification System (AIS) and logbook requirements, remain only partially implemented, leading to fragmented and inconsistent MCS oversight across India. Results at the implementation level highlight key challenges, including inconsistent vessel tracking, limited stakeholder engagement, and poor inter-state collaboration. The absence of a National Plan of Action against IUU (NPOA-IUU) and limited community participation constraint cohesive MCS strategies. Addressing these calls for prioritising vessel tracking technologies, enhancing inter-agency coordination, empowering fisher communities in decision-making, and tackling socio-economic barriers to MCS compliance. Such a multi-layered strategy can help safeguard India’s marine resources and secure the livelihoods of its coastal communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 106881"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002970","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With increasing pressure on marine ecosystems, effective Monitoring, Control, and Surveillance (MCS) measures are critical in managing Illegal, Unregulated, and Unreported (IUU) fishing. While this is a challenge faced globally, the Indian Ocean region presents a particularly compelling case due to its globally important ecological and economic role. Despite policy frameworks aimed at strengthening MCS, the practical implementation of these measures remains inconsistent across countries, posing challenges to reduce IUU fishing. We conducted a scoping review of MCS-related policies and their implementation within India. We reviewed documents (i.e. National policies & bills, international agreements, Maritime agreements, etc.) related to national and Kerala state policy, compared them with international standards, and finally explored their implementation by gathering available online evidence. Despite the adoption of technologies such as biometric identification cards, online registration platforms, and satellite-based communication systems, our findings reveal major gaps between the policy framework and its implementation. Some measures, including Automatic Identification System (AIS) and logbook requirements, remain only partially implemented, leading to fragmented and inconsistent MCS oversight across India. Results at the implementation level highlight key challenges, including inconsistent vessel tracking, limited stakeholder engagement, and poor inter-state collaboration. The absence of a National Plan of Action against IUU (NPOA-IUU) and limited community participation constraint cohesive MCS strategies. Addressing these calls for prioritising vessel tracking technologies, enhancing inter-agency coordination, empowering fisher communities in decision-making, and tackling socio-economic barriers to MCS compliance. Such a multi-layered strategy can help safeguard India’s marine resources and secure the livelihoods of its coastal communities.
衔接政策与实践:印度管理非法捕鱼的监测、控制和监督审查
随着海洋生态系统面临的压力越来越大,有效的监测、控制和监督(MCS)措施对于管理非法、不管制和不报告(IUU)捕捞至关重要。虽然这是全球面临的挑战,但印度洋地区因其在全球重要的生态和经济作用而呈现出特别引人注目的案例。尽管有旨在加强MCS的政策框架,但这些措施的实际执行在各国之间仍然不一致,这对减少IUU捕鱼构成了挑战。我们对mcs相关政策及其在印度的实施情况进行了范围审查。我们审查了与国家和喀拉拉邦政策相关的文件(即国家政策和法案、国际协议、海事协议等),并将其与国际标准进行了比较,最后通过收集在线证据来探讨其实施情况。尽管采用了诸如生物识别卡、在线注册平台和基于卫星的通信系统等技术,我们的研究结果揭示了政策框架与其实施之间的主要差距。一些措施,包括自动识别系统(AIS)和日志要求,仍然只是部分实施,导致整个印度的MCS监督分散和不一致。实施层面的结果突出了主要挑战,包括船只跟踪不一致、利益相关者参与有限以及国家间合作不佳。缺乏针对IUU的国家行动计划(NPOA-IUU)和有限的社区参与限制了具有凝聚力的MCS战略。解决这些问题需要优先考虑船舶跟踪技术,加强机构间协调,赋予渔民社区决策能力,并解决遵守MCS的社会经济障碍。这种多层次的战略可以帮助保护印度的海洋资源,保障沿海社区的生计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信