Factors affecting time to surgery and mobilization following hip fracture

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jack T. Bragg , Matthew Feldman , Dikran R. Balian , Catherine M. Call , Scott P. Ryan
{"title":"Factors affecting time to surgery and mobilization following hip fracture","authors":"Jack T. Bragg ,&nbsp;Matthew Feldman ,&nbsp;Dikran R. Balian ,&nbsp;Catherine M. Call ,&nbsp;Scott P. Ryan","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Faster time to operative fixation and mobilization decreases morbidity and mortality for hip fracture patients. Many hospitals are working at or above their capacity and beds in surgical floors for surgical patients may not be available. The purpose of this study was to determine if the floor of admission after a hip fracture impacts time to surgical fixation and time to mobilization after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>781 patients over the age of 50 who underwent hip fracture surgery between January 2011 and January 2021 were included in this analysis. Patient demographics, injury characteristics and floor of admission were collected and analyzed. Time of diagnosis was defined as the time of the initial presenting radiograph, and time of mobilization was defined as the time the patient stood at edge of bed with physical therapy. Floor of admission is determined based on admitting service (medicine, orthopaedics, trauma surgery) as well as bed availability. Floors were considered surgical or non-surgical based on standard patient populations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Time to surgery from diagnosis was significantly longer on nonsurgical floors (28 vs. 22 hours p = 0.003). Time from surgery to mobilization out of bed was significantly shorter for patients on surgical floors (53 vs. 63 hours, p = 0.01). There was no difference in time to evaluation by physical therapy (p = 0.8). Time from diagnosis to surgery and time from surgery to injury was not different across patient races or language spoken.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients admitted to non-surgical floors had a significantly longer time to surgery as well as longer time to mobilization compared to patients who were admitted to surgical floors. Time to physical therapy evaluation following surgery was the same, suggesting different factors such as medical comorbidities, staff training, and resource availability likely contribute to the significant difference in time to mobilization. Race and language did not play a role in delaying time to the operating room or mobilization with physical therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 11","pages":"Article 112726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Faster time to operative fixation and mobilization decreases morbidity and mortality for hip fracture patients. Many hospitals are working at or above their capacity and beds in surgical floors for surgical patients may not be available. The purpose of this study was to determine if the floor of admission after a hip fracture impacts time to surgical fixation and time to mobilization after surgery.

Methods

781 patients over the age of 50 who underwent hip fracture surgery between January 2011 and January 2021 were included in this analysis. Patient demographics, injury characteristics and floor of admission were collected and analyzed. Time of diagnosis was defined as the time of the initial presenting radiograph, and time of mobilization was defined as the time the patient stood at edge of bed with physical therapy. Floor of admission is determined based on admitting service (medicine, orthopaedics, trauma surgery) as well as bed availability. Floors were considered surgical or non-surgical based on standard patient populations.

Results

Time to surgery from diagnosis was significantly longer on nonsurgical floors (28 vs. 22 hours p = 0.003). Time from surgery to mobilization out of bed was significantly shorter for patients on surgical floors (53 vs. 63 hours, p = 0.01). There was no difference in time to evaluation by physical therapy (p = 0.8). Time from diagnosis to surgery and time from surgery to injury was not different across patient races or language spoken.

Conclusions

Patients admitted to non-surgical floors had a significantly longer time to surgery as well as longer time to mobilization compared to patients who were admitted to surgical floors. Time to physical therapy evaluation following surgery was the same, suggesting different factors such as medical comorbidities, staff training, and resource availability likely contribute to the significant difference in time to mobilization. Race and language did not play a role in delaying time to the operating room or mobilization with physical therapy.
影响髋部骨折后手术时间和活动的因素
更快的手术固定和活动时间降低了髋部骨折患者的发病率和死亡率。许多医院都在超负荷工作,外科病人的手术楼层可能没有床位。本研究的目的是确定髋部骨折后入院的地板是否影响手术固定时间和术后活动时间。方法:2011年1月至2021年1月期间接受髋部骨折手术的50岁以上患者781例纳入本分析。收集和分析患者人口统计、损伤特征和入院楼层。诊断时间定义为首次出现x线片的时间,活动时间定义为患者在物理治疗下站在床边的时间。住院楼层是根据住院服务(内科、骨科、创伤外科)和床位情况确定的。根据标准患者人群,地板被认为是手术或非手术。结果非手术楼层从诊断到手术时间明显更长(28小时比22小时p = 0.003)。在手术楼层的患者从手术到下床活动的时间明显缩短(53小时对63小时,p = 0.01)。两组间进行物理治疗的时间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.8)。从诊断到手术的时间和从手术到受伤的时间在患者种族或语言上没有差异。结论非手术地板住院患者的手术时间和活动时间明显长于手术地板住院患者。手术后进行物理治疗评估的时间是相同的,这表明不同的因素,如医疗合并症、工作人员培训和资源可用性可能导致活动时间的显着差异。种族和语言在延迟到手术室的时间或通过物理治疗动员方面没有发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信