Nicotine and neurocognition in HIV: Translational challenges and therapeutic potential

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Neal A. Jha , Samantha M. Ayoub , Arthur L. Brody , Jared W. Young
{"title":"Nicotine and neurocognition in HIV: Translational challenges and therapeutic potential","authors":"Neal A. Jha ,&nbsp;Samantha M. Ayoub ,&nbsp;Arthur L. Brody ,&nbsp;Jared W. Young","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Approximately half of people with HIV (PWH) experience neurocognitive impairment (NCI), despite antiretroviral therapies that have turned what was formerly a death sentence to a chronic illness. No targeted treatments exist for HIV-associated NCI, impacting long-term quality of life. Smoking rates in PWH are nearly double those of the general population, and with evidence for pro-cognitive effects of nicotine, this may reflect self-medication. However, clinical studies yield inconsistent findings—some showing benefits, others reporting harm—likely due to variability in nicotine exposure methods, cognitive testing paradigms, withdrawal states, and confounding comorbidities. In contrast, animal studies offer a more controlled framework to isolate the effects of nicotine. Preclinical models suggest that nicotine may mitigate HIV-associated cognitive deficits by acting on α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), leading to reduced neuroinflammation. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting nAChRs, though mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Despite the clarifications offered by preclinical work, translation to human models remains challenging, with key challenges including variability in defining nicotine use, route of administration, confirming mechanism of action, and controlling for comorbidities. Future studies could utilize vaping mechanisms, self-administration paradigms, and translational cognitive assessments to clarify the potential for nicotine and nAChR agonists to attenuate NCI. While nicotine-based therapies show promise, their risks—particularly smoking-related health complications in PWH—must be considered, hence the need to discover potential pro-cognitive mechanisms of action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 106348"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425003495","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately half of people with HIV (PWH) experience neurocognitive impairment (NCI), despite antiretroviral therapies that have turned what was formerly a death sentence to a chronic illness. No targeted treatments exist for HIV-associated NCI, impacting long-term quality of life. Smoking rates in PWH are nearly double those of the general population, and with evidence for pro-cognitive effects of nicotine, this may reflect self-medication. However, clinical studies yield inconsistent findings—some showing benefits, others reporting harm—likely due to variability in nicotine exposure methods, cognitive testing paradigms, withdrawal states, and confounding comorbidities. In contrast, animal studies offer a more controlled framework to isolate the effects of nicotine. Preclinical models suggest that nicotine may mitigate HIV-associated cognitive deficits by acting on α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), leading to reduced neuroinflammation. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting nAChRs, though mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Despite the clarifications offered by preclinical work, translation to human models remains challenging, with key challenges including variability in defining nicotine use, route of administration, confirming mechanism of action, and controlling for comorbidities. Future studies could utilize vaping mechanisms, self-administration paradigms, and translational cognitive assessments to clarify the potential for nicotine and nAChR agonists to attenuate NCI. While nicotine-based therapies show promise, their risks—particularly smoking-related health complications in PWH—must be considered, hence the need to discover potential pro-cognitive mechanisms of action.

Abstract Image

尼古丁和HIV的神经认知:转化挑战和治疗潜力
尽管抗逆转录病毒疗法已经将以前被判死刑的艾滋病变成了一种慢性疾病,但大约一半的艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)经历了神经认知障碍(NCI)。没有针对hiv相关NCI的靶向治疗,影响长期生活质量。PWH的吸烟率几乎是一般人群的两倍,并且有证据表明尼古丁对认知有促进作用,这可能反映了自我药物治疗。然而,临床研究得出了不一致的结果——一些显示有益,另一些报告有害——可能是由于尼古丁暴露方法、认知测试范例、戒断状态和混杂的合并症的变化。相比之下,动物实验提供了一个更可控的框架来分离尼古丁的影响。临床前模型表明,尼古丁可能通过作用于α7尼古丁乙酰胆碱受体(nachr)来减轻hiv相关的认知缺陷,从而减少神经炎症。这些发现强调了靶向nachr的治疗潜力,尽管机制尚不完全清楚。尽管临床前工作提供了澄清,但将其转化为人类模型仍然具有挑战性,主要挑战包括定义尼古丁使用、给药途径、确认作用机制和控制合并症的可变性。未来的研究可以利用电子烟机制、自我给药范式和转化认知评估来阐明尼古丁和nAChR激动剂减轻NCI的潜力。虽然以尼古丁为基础的治疗显示出希望,但必须考虑到它们的风险——特别是与吸烟相关的pwh健康并发症,因此需要发现潜在的促进认知的作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信