G. Trimpou, A. Begić, K. Obreja, A. Montada, P. Parvini, F. Schwarz
{"title":"Clinical Performance of Immediately Restored, Surface Modified Two‐Piece Zirconia Implants. A Prospective Case Series","authors":"G. Trimpou, A. Begić, K. Obreja, A. Montada, P. Parvini, F. Schwarz","doi":"10.1111/clr.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeTo evaluate the short‐term success and survival rates of immediately restored surface modified two‐piece zirconia implants (CL).Material and MethodsA total of 23 patients had received CL implants (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 26) for single‐tooth replacements in the anterior and posterior maxilla and mandible at healed extraction sites. Immediate implant restoration was accomplished if an insertion torque ≥ 30 Ncm was reached (Type 3–4 A protocol). Final occlusally screw‐retained crowns were provided after 3 months of healing.Implant survival and success (i.e., bleeding on probing—BOP, probing pocket depth—PD, mucosal recession—MR) were assessed at 6 and 12 months following final restoration.Patient‐reported outcomes were evaluated at 6 and 12 months.ResultsFive implants (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 5 patients) could not be immediately restored, and four implants were lost during follow‐up. The survival rates amounted to 80%. For the final analysis, 16 patients with a total of 16 implants were evaluated. Minor changes to baseline (final restoration) were noted at 6 and 12 months for mean BOP (−3.3% ± 13.14%; 8.3% ± 16.9%), PD (−0.15 ± 0.48 mm; 0.08 ± 0.48 mm), and MR (0.0 ± 0.0 mm; 0.0 ± 0.0 mm) values. Mechanical and technical complications were not observed. Patients expressed an overall high satisfaction at 6 and 12 months.ConclusionsThe presented immediate restoration protocol may be associated with an increased risk for early implant losses.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeTo evaluate the short‐term success and survival rates of immediately restored surface modified two‐piece zirconia implants (CL).Material and MethodsA total of 23 patients had received CL implants (n = 26) for single‐tooth replacements in the anterior and posterior maxilla and mandible at healed extraction sites. Immediate implant restoration was accomplished if an insertion torque ≥ 30 Ncm was reached (Type 3–4 A protocol). Final occlusally screw‐retained crowns were provided after 3 months of healing.Implant survival and success (i.e., bleeding on probing—BOP, probing pocket depth—PD, mucosal recession—MR) were assessed at 6 and 12 months following final restoration.Patient‐reported outcomes were evaluated at 6 and 12 months.ResultsFive implants (n = 5 patients) could not be immediately restored, and four implants were lost during follow‐up. The survival rates amounted to 80%. For the final analysis, 16 patients with a total of 16 implants were evaluated. Minor changes to baseline (final restoration) were noted at 6 and 12 months for mean BOP (−3.3% ± 13.14%; 8.3% ± 16.9%), PD (−0.15 ± 0.48 mm; 0.08 ± 0.48 mm), and MR (0.0 ± 0.0 mm; 0.0 ± 0.0 mm) values. Mechanical and technical complications were not observed. Patients expressed an overall high satisfaction at 6 and 12 months.ConclusionsThe presented immediate restoration protocol may be associated with an increased risk for early implant losses.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.