Breast Cancer Awareness Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study Among Adult Women

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Süleyman Utku Uzun, Ayşe Nur Usturali Mut, Meltem Çöl
{"title":"Breast Cancer Awareness Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study Among Adult Women","authors":"Süleyman Utku Uzun,&nbsp;Ayşe Nur Usturali Mut,&nbsp;Meltem Çöl","doi":"10.1111/ijn.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Breast Cancer Awareness Scale (BCAS-TR) for assessing breast cancer awareness among Turkish women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The data of this methodological study were collected by face-to-face interview technique from 352 women over 18 years of age at a family health centre in Ankara, Türkiye. The BCAS-TR, adapted from the original 35-item scale, assessed knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related to breast cancer. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), content validity, convergent and discriminant validity, concurrent validity and reliability analysis were performed. Champion's Health Belief Model Scale was used for concurrent validity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>CFA supported the five-factor structure of the original scale. All fit indices met the recommended criteria. The values of AVE of all factors ranged between 0.579 and 0.853. AVE values (&gt; 0.5) and discriminant validity analysis supported convergent and discriminant validity. Significant positive correlations with the Champion's Health Belief Model Scale demonstrated concurrent validity. The Cronbach <i>α</i> of the total scale is 0.907 (subscales ranged between 0.752 and 0.907). The composite reliability values of the subscales ranged between 0.770 and 0.949.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The BCAS-TR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing breast cancer awareness in Turkish women. This scale can be used by researchers and healthcare professionals to develop targeted interventions and improve early detection and prevention of breast cancer in Türkiye.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Breast Cancer Awareness Scale (BCAS-TR) for assessing breast cancer awareness among Turkish women.

Methods

The data of this methodological study were collected by face-to-face interview technique from 352 women over 18 years of age at a family health centre in Ankara, Türkiye. The BCAS-TR, adapted from the original 35-item scale, assessed knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related to breast cancer. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), content validity, convergent and discriminant validity, concurrent validity and reliability analysis were performed. Champion's Health Belief Model Scale was used for concurrent validity.

Results

CFA supported the five-factor structure of the original scale. All fit indices met the recommended criteria. The values of AVE of all factors ranged between 0.579 and 0.853. AVE values (> 0.5) and discriminant validity analysis supported convergent and discriminant validity. Significant positive correlations with the Champion's Health Belief Model Scale demonstrated concurrent validity. The Cronbach α of the total scale is 0.907 (subscales ranged between 0.752 and 0.907). The composite reliability values of the subscales ranged between 0.770 and 0.949.

Conclusions

The BCAS-TR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing breast cancer awareness in Turkish women. This scale can be used by researchers and healthcare professionals to develop targeted interventions and improve early detection and prevention of breast cancer in Türkiye.

乳腺癌认知量表:土耳其成年妇女的效度和信度研究
目的本研究旨在评估土耳其版乳腺癌意识量表(BCAS-TR)用于评估土耳其妇女乳腺癌意识的有效性和可靠性。方法采用面对面访谈法,对基耶省安卡拉一家家庭保健中心的352名18岁以上妇女进行方法学研究。BCAS-TR从原来的35项量表中改编而来,评估与乳腺癌相关的知识、态度和行为。进行验证性因子分析(CFA)、内容效度、收敛效度和区别效度、并发效度和信度分析。并发效度采用Champion健康信念模型量表。结果CFA支持原量表的五因子结构。所有拟合指标均符合推荐标准。各因子的AVE值在0.579 ~ 0.853之间。AVE值(> 0.5)和判别效度分析支持收敛效度和判别效度。与Champion健康信念模型量表呈显著正相关,显示并发效度。总量表的Cronbach α为0.907(子量表为0.752 ~ 0.907)。各分量表的复合信度值在0.770 ~ 0.949之间。结论BCAS-TR是评估土耳其妇女乳腺癌意识的有效和可靠的工具。研究人员和卫生保健专业人员可以使用该量表制定有针对性的干预措施,并改善基耶岛乳腺癌的早期发现和预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信