Paths to none-take-up: Why people in need are not included in public welfare systems

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
Johan Vamstad
{"title":"Paths to none-take-up: Why people in need are not included in public welfare systems","authors":"Johan Vamstad","doi":"10.1111/ijsw.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is based on a study of individuals who are not receiving the public aid and benefits that they are entitled to, and in need of, what is known as ‘non-take-up’ (NTU). The aim of the study is to explore the various causes of NTU in the public welfare system in Sweden, and the main research question is why individuals that are eligible for public benefits do not receive them. This question is approached from a bottom-up perspective, by interviewing 33 individuals in a NTU situation about their stories of interaction with public welfare institutions. The individuals were selected in collaboration with a charitable non-profit organisation that receives people in need who are not receiving any other public support, or all the support they are entitled to. Through the use of content analysis, the interviews identify several causes of NTU. These include poor information and means of communication with welfare institutions, technocratic rules, unfriendly treatment and unprofessional behaviour among social workers, and interagency mismanagement of individual cases. The conclusions suggest that NTU is a serious problem in the Swedish welfare system that causes both unnecessary suffering and added costs to society.</p>","PeriodicalId":47567,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Welfare","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsw.70040","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsw.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is based on a study of individuals who are not receiving the public aid and benefits that they are entitled to, and in need of, what is known as ‘non-take-up’ (NTU). The aim of the study is to explore the various causes of NTU in the public welfare system in Sweden, and the main research question is why individuals that are eligible for public benefits do not receive them. This question is approached from a bottom-up perspective, by interviewing 33 individuals in a NTU situation about their stories of interaction with public welfare institutions. The individuals were selected in collaboration with a charitable non-profit organisation that receives people in need who are not receiving any other public support, or all the support they are entitled to. Through the use of content analysis, the interviews identify several causes of NTU. These include poor information and means of communication with welfare institutions, technocratic rules, unfriendly treatment and unprofessional behaviour among social workers, and interagency mismanagement of individual cases. The conclusions suggest that NTU is a serious problem in the Swedish welfare system that causes both unnecessary suffering and added costs to society.

通往不接受的道路:为什么有需要的人不包括在公共福利体系中
这篇文章是基于一项研究,研究对象是那些没有获得他们有权获得的公共援助和福利,并且需要的人,即所谓的“非接受”(NTU)。本研究的目的是探讨瑞典公共福利制度中NTU的各种原因,主要研究问题是为什么有资格获得公共福利的个人没有得到它们。这个问题是从自下而上的角度来解决的,通过采访33位在南洋理工大学的人,了解他们与公益机构互动的故事。这些人是与一家慈善非营利机构合作选出的,该机构负责接收没有获得任何其他公共支持或他们有权获得的所有支持的有需要的人。通过内容分析,访谈确定了NTU的几个原因。这些问题包括缺乏与福利机构的信息和沟通手段,技术官僚主义的规则,社会工作者之间不友好的待遇和不专业的行为,以及机构间对个别案件的管理不善。结论表明,NTU是瑞典福利制度中的一个严重问题,既造成不必要的痛苦,又增加了社会成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Welfare publishes original articles in English on social welfare and social work. Its interdisciplinary approach and comparative perspective promote examination of the most pressing social welfare issues of the day by researchers from the various branches of the applied social sciences. The journal seeks to disseminate knowledge and to encourage debate about these issues and their regional and global implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信