Variation in Cell Wall Composition and Saccharification Potential of Seed-Based Miscanthus Hybrids Grown on Marginal Lands Across Six European Trial Locations

IF 4.1 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Kasper van der Cruijsen, Mohamad Al Hassan, Oene Dolstra, Elena Magenau, Mislav Kontek, Chris Ashman, Danny Awty-Carroll, Andrea Ferrarini, Enrico Martani, Phillip van der Pluijm, Gert-Jan Petri, Emmanuel de Maupeou, Maria-João Paulo, Jason Kam, Bert-Jan van Dinter, Lars Kraak, Annemarie Dechesne, Vanja Juriŝić, Iris Lewandowski, Stefano Amaducci, John Clifton-Brown, Andreas Kiesel, Luisa M. Trindade
{"title":"Variation in Cell Wall Composition and Saccharification Potential of Seed-Based Miscanthus Hybrids Grown on Marginal Lands Across Six European Trial Locations","authors":"Kasper van der Cruijsen,&nbsp;Mohamad Al Hassan,&nbsp;Oene Dolstra,&nbsp;Elena Magenau,&nbsp;Mislav Kontek,&nbsp;Chris Ashman,&nbsp;Danny Awty-Carroll,&nbsp;Andrea Ferrarini,&nbsp;Enrico Martani,&nbsp;Phillip van der Pluijm,&nbsp;Gert-Jan Petri,&nbsp;Emmanuel de Maupeou,&nbsp;Maria-João Paulo,&nbsp;Jason Kam,&nbsp;Bert-Jan van Dinter,&nbsp;Lars Kraak,&nbsp;Annemarie Dechesne,&nbsp;Vanja Juriŝić,&nbsp;Iris Lewandowski,&nbsp;Stefano Amaducci,&nbsp;John Clifton-Brown,&nbsp;Andreas Kiesel,&nbsp;Luisa M. Trindade","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Miscanthus breeding programs have focused on developing intraspecific (<i>M. sinensis</i> × <i>M. sinensis</i>) and interspecific (<i>M. sinensis</i> × <i>M. sacchariflorus</i>) seed-based hybrids with distinct cell wall characteristics for different biomass value chains. Here, we evaluated the performance of 13 novel hybrids (including seed-based intraspecific, seed-based interspecific, and one clonally propagated interspecific hybrid) relative to <i>Miscanthus × giganteus</i> (<i>M</i> × <i>g</i>). We compared the cell wall composition, saccharification efficiency, and yield after spring harvests in 2021 and 2022 across six European locations. Cell wall content and composition varied significantly among hybrids and were influenced by environmental conditions, yet differences due to parental background were largely consistent across locations. On average, seed-based interspecific hybrids (80.6%–84.0% neutral detergent fiber) had a lower total cell wall content than the other hybrids evaluated in this study (88.3%–90.8%). In contrast, cellulose was ~5.5% higher in hybrids with an <i>M. sinensis</i> × <i>M. sacchariflorus</i> background relative to the intraspecific hybrids, while hemicellulose averaged above 34% for intraspecific hybrids, 29.4% to 31.8% in the interspecific hybrids, and below 27% for <i>M</i> × <i>g</i>. Lignin content was highest in <i>M</i> × <i>g</i> (~13.8%), intermediate in the interspecific hybrids (11.0%–12.2%), and lowest in the intraspecific hybrids (~10%). These compositional traits translated into saccharification efficiencies that were 32.9% higher for the intraspecific hybrids and 9.8%–13.1% higher for the interspecific hybrids (seed-based and clonally propagated) compared to <i>M</i> × <i>g</i>. Accounting for biomass yield, either several seed-based hybrids or the novel clonally propagated hybrid exceeded the theoretical ethanol potential of <i>M</i> × <i>g</i> at all trial locations, indicating strong potential for their use in lignocellulosic biofuel production.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Miscanthus breeding programs have focused on developing intraspecific (M. sinensis × M. sinensis) and interspecific (M. sinensis × M. sacchariflorus) seed-based hybrids with distinct cell wall characteristics for different biomass value chains. Here, we evaluated the performance of 13 novel hybrids (including seed-based intraspecific, seed-based interspecific, and one clonally propagated interspecific hybrid) relative to Miscanthus × giganteus (M × g). We compared the cell wall composition, saccharification efficiency, and yield after spring harvests in 2021 and 2022 across six European locations. Cell wall content and composition varied significantly among hybrids and were influenced by environmental conditions, yet differences due to parental background were largely consistent across locations. On average, seed-based interspecific hybrids (80.6%–84.0% neutral detergent fiber) had a lower total cell wall content than the other hybrids evaluated in this study (88.3%–90.8%). In contrast, cellulose was ~5.5% higher in hybrids with an M. sinensis × M. sacchariflorus background relative to the intraspecific hybrids, while hemicellulose averaged above 34% for intraspecific hybrids, 29.4% to 31.8% in the interspecific hybrids, and below 27% for M × g. Lignin content was highest in M × g (~13.8%), intermediate in the interspecific hybrids (11.0%–12.2%), and lowest in the intraspecific hybrids (~10%). These compositional traits translated into saccharification efficiencies that were 32.9% higher for the intraspecific hybrids and 9.8%–13.1% higher for the interspecific hybrids (seed-based and clonally propagated) compared to M × g. Accounting for biomass yield, either several seed-based hybrids or the novel clonally propagated hybrid exceeded the theoretical ethanol potential of M × g at all trial locations, indicating strong potential for their use in lignocellulosic biofuel production.

Abstract Image

在欧洲六个试验点边缘土地上种植的种子型芒草杂交种细胞壁组成和糖化潜力的变化
芒草育种计划的重点是培育种内(M. sinensis × M. sinensis)和种间(M. sinensis × M. sacchariflorus)基于种子的杂交品种,它们具有不同的细胞壁特征,适用于不同的生物量价值链。本文对13个与Miscanthus × giganteus (M × g)相关的新杂交种(包括种内杂交种、种间杂交种和一个无性繁殖的种间杂交种)的表现进行了评价。我们比较了欧洲六个地区2021年和2022年春季收获后的细胞壁组成、糖化效率和产量。不同杂交种间细胞壁含量和组成差异显著,且受环境条件的影响,但亲本背景造成的差异在不同地点基本一致。以种子为基础的种间杂种(80.6% ~ 84.0%)的总细胞壁含量(88.3% ~ 90.8%)低于其他品种(80.6% ~ 84.0%)。与此相反,与种内杂交种相比,中华支原体×糖花支原体的纤维素含量高出约5.5%,种内杂交种的平均纤维素含量高于34%,种间杂交种的平均半纤维素含量为29.4% ~ 31.8%,而M × g的平均半纤维素含量低于27%。木素含量以M × g最高(~13.8%),种间杂交居中(11.0% ~ 12.2%),种内杂交最低(~10%)。这些组成性状转化为种内杂交种的糖化效率比M × g高32.9%,种间杂交种(种子型和无性系繁殖)的糖化效率比M × g高9.8% ~ 13.1%。考虑到生物质产量,在所有试验地点,无论是几种基于种子的杂交种还是新的无性繁殖杂交种,都超过了M × g的理论乙醇潜力,表明它们在木质纤维素生物燃料生产中具有强大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信