Variation in Cell Wall Composition and Saccharification Potential of Seed-Based Miscanthus Hybrids Grown on Marginal Lands Across Six European Trial Locations
Kasper van der Cruijsen, Mohamad Al Hassan, Oene Dolstra, Elena Magenau, Mislav Kontek, Chris Ashman, Danny Awty-Carroll, Andrea Ferrarini, Enrico Martani, Phillip van der Pluijm, Gert-Jan Petri, Emmanuel de Maupeou, Maria-João Paulo, Jason Kam, Bert-Jan van Dinter, Lars Kraak, Annemarie Dechesne, Vanja Juriŝić, Iris Lewandowski, Stefano Amaducci, John Clifton-Brown, Andreas Kiesel, Luisa M. Trindade
{"title":"Variation in Cell Wall Composition and Saccharification Potential of Seed-Based Miscanthus Hybrids Grown on Marginal Lands Across Six European Trial Locations","authors":"Kasper van der Cruijsen, Mohamad Al Hassan, Oene Dolstra, Elena Magenau, Mislav Kontek, Chris Ashman, Danny Awty-Carroll, Andrea Ferrarini, Enrico Martani, Phillip van der Pluijm, Gert-Jan Petri, Emmanuel de Maupeou, Maria-João Paulo, Jason Kam, Bert-Jan van Dinter, Lars Kraak, Annemarie Dechesne, Vanja Juriŝić, Iris Lewandowski, Stefano Amaducci, John Clifton-Brown, Andreas Kiesel, Luisa M. Trindade","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Miscanthus breeding programs have focused on developing intraspecific (<i>M. sinensis</i> × <i>M. sinensis</i>) and interspecific (<i>M. sinensis</i> × <i>M. sacchariflorus</i>) seed-based hybrids with distinct cell wall characteristics for different biomass value chains. Here, we evaluated the performance of 13 novel hybrids (including seed-based intraspecific, seed-based interspecific, and one clonally propagated interspecific hybrid) relative to <i>Miscanthus × giganteus</i> (<i>M</i> × <i>g</i>). We compared the cell wall composition, saccharification efficiency, and yield after spring harvests in 2021 and 2022 across six European locations. Cell wall content and composition varied significantly among hybrids and were influenced by environmental conditions, yet differences due to parental background were largely consistent across locations. On average, seed-based interspecific hybrids (80.6%–84.0% neutral detergent fiber) had a lower total cell wall content than the other hybrids evaluated in this study (88.3%–90.8%). In contrast, cellulose was ~5.5% higher in hybrids with an <i>M. sinensis</i> × <i>M. sacchariflorus</i> background relative to the intraspecific hybrids, while hemicellulose averaged above 34% for intraspecific hybrids, 29.4% to 31.8% in the interspecific hybrids, and below 27% for <i>M</i> × <i>g</i>. Lignin content was highest in <i>M</i> × <i>g</i> (~13.8%), intermediate in the interspecific hybrids (11.0%–12.2%), and lowest in the intraspecific hybrids (~10%). These compositional traits translated into saccharification efficiencies that were 32.9% higher for the intraspecific hybrids and 9.8%–13.1% higher for the interspecific hybrids (seed-based and clonally propagated) compared to <i>M</i> × <i>g</i>. Accounting for biomass yield, either several seed-based hybrids or the novel clonally propagated hybrid exceeded the theoretical ethanol potential of <i>M</i> × <i>g</i> at all trial locations, indicating strong potential for their use in lignocellulosic biofuel production.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Miscanthus breeding programs have focused on developing intraspecific (M. sinensis × M. sinensis) and interspecific (M. sinensis × M. sacchariflorus) seed-based hybrids with distinct cell wall characteristics for different biomass value chains. Here, we evaluated the performance of 13 novel hybrids (including seed-based intraspecific, seed-based interspecific, and one clonally propagated interspecific hybrid) relative to Miscanthus × giganteus (M × g). We compared the cell wall composition, saccharification efficiency, and yield after spring harvests in 2021 and 2022 across six European locations. Cell wall content and composition varied significantly among hybrids and were influenced by environmental conditions, yet differences due to parental background were largely consistent across locations. On average, seed-based interspecific hybrids (80.6%–84.0% neutral detergent fiber) had a lower total cell wall content than the other hybrids evaluated in this study (88.3%–90.8%). In contrast, cellulose was ~5.5% higher in hybrids with an M. sinensis × M. sacchariflorus background relative to the intraspecific hybrids, while hemicellulose averaged above 34% for intraspecific hybrids, 29.4% to 31.8% in the interspecific hybrids, and below 27% for M × g. Lignin content was highest in M × g (~13.8%), intermediate in the interspecific hybrids (11.0%–12.2%), and lowest in the intraspecific hybrids (~10%). These compositional traits translated into saccharification efficiencies that were 32.9% higher for the intraspecific hybrids and 9.8%–13.1% higher for the interspecific hybrids (seed-based and clonally propagated) compared to M × g. Accounting for biomass yield, either several seed-based hybrids or the novel clonally propagated hybrid exceeded the theoretical ethanol potential of M × g at all trial locations, indicating strong potential for their use in lignocellulosic biofuel production.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.