Validation of a Dried Blood Spot Method for the Determination of a Third-Generation Bcr-Abl 1 Inhibitor, Vodobatinib, in Small Volumes of Rat Blood: Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study
{"title":"Validation of a Dried Blood Spot Method for the Determination of a Third-Generation Bcr-Abl 1 Inhibitor, Vodobatinib, in Small Volumes of Rat Blood: Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study","authors":"Ashok Zakkula, Keerthana Madipelli, Niranjan Veerla, Rama Murthi Bestha, Sandeep Kaddare, Sreekanth Dittakavi, Ramesh Mullangi","doi":"10.1002/bmc.70204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Vodobatinib is a third-generation Bcr-Abl 1 inhibitor, being used in chronic myeloid leukemia treatment. Herein, we report a validated LC–MS/MS method for quantifying vodobatinib from rat dried blood spot (DBS) as per FDA guidelines. Methanol was used as a solvent to extract vodobatinib from the DBS discs. We used an isocratic method with a flow rate of 0.80 mL/min in an Atlantis dC<sub>18</sub> (50 <b>×</b> 4.6 mm, 3.0 μm) column with a 2.00 min run time. The retention of vodobatinib and the I.S. was ~1.15 and 1.05 min. The MS/MS ion transitions monitored for vodobatinib and I.S. were m/z 454.20 → 270.05 and 309.15 → 251.15, respectively. The linearity range was 1.04–1039 ng/mL. All the evaluated validation parameters met the acceptance criteria. Hematocrit levels of 35% and 50% yielded consistent concentrations at both low and high QC levels, with accuracy of 1.00%–1.03% and precision below 10%, indicating no hematocrit effect. For intravenous dosing, AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> was 9475 ng·h/mL (DBS) versus 10,109 ng·h/mL (plasma), and for oral dosing, <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> values were 568 ng/mL (DBS) versus 544 ng/mL (plasma). Oral bioavailability was nearly identical between matrices (98.7% for DBS vs. 97.9% for plasma), confirming the reliability of DBS sampling for PK studies of vodobatinib.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8861,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Chromatography","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Chromatography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bmc.70204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Vodobatinib is a third-generation Bcr-Abl 1 inhibitor, being used in chronic myeloid leukemia treatment. Herein, we report a validated LC–MS/MS method for quantifying vodobatinib from rat dried blood spot (DBS) as per FDA guidelines. Methanol was used as a solvent to extract vodobatinib from the DBS discs. We used an isocratic method with a flow rate of 0.80 mL/min in an Atlantis dC18 (50 × 4.6 mm, 3.0 μm) column with a 2.00 min run time. The retention of vodobatinib and the I.S. was ~1.15 and 1.05 min. The MS/MS ion transitions monitored for vodobatinib and I.S. were m/z 454.20 → 270.05 and 309.15 → 251.15, respectively. The linearity range was 1.04–1039 ng/mL. All the evaluated validation parameters met the acceptance criteria. Hematocrit levels of 35% and 50% yielded consistent concentrations at both low and high QC levels, with accuracy of 1.00%–1.03% and precision below 10%, indicating no hematocrit effect. For intravenous dosing, AUC0–∞ was 9475 ng·h/mL (DBS) versus 10,109 ng·h/mL (plasma), and for oral dosing, Cmax values were 568 ng/mL (DBS) versus 544 ng/mL (plasma). Oral bioavailability was nearly identical between matrices (98.7% for DBS vs. 97.9% for plasma), confirming the reliability of DBS sampling for PK studies of vodobatinib.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical Chromatography is devoted to the publication of original papers on the applications of chromatography and allied techniques in the biological and medical sciences. Research papers and review articles cover the methods and techniques relevant to the separation, identification and determination of substances in biochemistry, biotechnology, molecular biology, cell biology, clinical chemistry, pharmacology and related disciplines. These include the analysis of body fluids, cells and tissues, purification of biologically important compounds, pharmaco-kinetics and sequencing methods using HPLC, GC, HPLC-MS, TLC, paper chromatography, affinity chromatography, gel filtration, electrophoresis and related techniques.