Analysis of high purity boron carbide by solid sampling graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry†

IF 3.1 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Edson I. Muller, Paola A. Mello, Thiago C. Pereira, Rodrigo C. Bolzan and Erico M. M. Flores
{"title":"Analysis of high purity boron carbide by solid sampling graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry†","authors":"Edson I. Muller, Paola A. Mello, Thiago C. Pereira, Rodrigo C. Bolzan and Erico M. M. Flores","doi":"10.1039/D5JA00131E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >An alternative method for the determination of metallic impurities in high purity boron carbide (B<small><sub>4</sub></small>C) using solid sampling graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (SS-GFAAS) was proposed. The feasibility of using a Zeeman-effect background correction system operating with a variable magnetic field (VMF) was evaluated to provide a large working range for Al, Cr, Cu, Mn and Ni determination in B<small><sub>4</sub></small>C samples. The following parameters were evaluated: pyrolysis and atomization temperatures, sample mass, as well as the use of alternative wavelengths for Al and Mn. As an important achievement, calibration using aqueous standard solutions was feasible and chemical modifiers were not necessary. However, it was observed that the use of graphite powder to cover the sample platform avoided the damage of the pyrolytic layer of the graphite platform. Working ranges from 0.01 to 1500 μg g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> were obtained for the metallic impurity determination by SS-GFAAS. Sample masses up to 2.5 mg were used providing limits of detection ranging from 0.003 to 1 μg g<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, with a RSD lower than 17%. The accuracy was evaluated using the B<small><sub>4</sub></small>C certified reference material (BAM/ERM-ED 102) and by comparison of the results obtained by microwave-assisted-wet digestion and alkaline fusion with subsequent determination by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). No differences were observed between the results obtained by SS-GFAAS and those by ICP-OES after both digestion methods (<em>t</em>-test, 95% confidence level). Additionally, the results presented no significant differences with the values of the certified reference material. The proposed SS-GFAAS method allowed quality control related to determination of Al, Cr, Cu, Mn and Ni in B<small><sub>4</sub></small>C with a large working range and limits of detection lower than those achieved by other methods reported in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":81,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","volume":" 9","pages":" 2498-2506"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ja/d5ja00131e","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An alternative method for the determination of metallic impurities in high purity boron carbide (B4C) using solid sampling graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (SS-GFAAS) was proposed. The feasibility of using a Zeeman-effect background correction system operating with a variable magnetic field (VMF) was evaluated to provide a large working range for Al, Cr, Cu, Mn and Ni determination in B4C samples. The following parameters were evaluated: pyrolysis and atomization temperatures, sample mass, as well as the use of alternative wavelengths for Al and Mn. As an important achievement, calibration using aqueous standard solutions was feasible and chemical modifiers were not necessary. However, it was observed that the use of graphite powder to cover the sample platform avoided the damage of the pyrolytic layer of the graphite platform. Working ranges from 0.01 to 1500 μg g−1 were obtained for the metallic impurity determination by SS-GFAAS. Sample masses up to 2.5 mg were used providing limits of detection ranging from 0.003 to 1 μg g−1, with a RSD lower than 17%. The accuracy was evaluated using the B4C certified reference material (BAM/ERM-ED 102) and by comparison of the results obtained by microwave-assisted-wet digestion and alkaline fusion with subsequent determination by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). No differences were observed between the results obtained by SS-GFAAS and those by ICP-OES after both digestion methods (t-test, 95% confidence level). Additionally, the results presented no significant differences with the values of the certified reference material. The proposed SS-GFAAS method allowed quality control related to determination of Al, Cr, Cu, Mn and Ni in B4C with a large working range and limits of detection lower than those achieved by other methods reported in the literature.

Abstract Image

固体进样石墨炉原子吸收光谱法分析高纯碳化硼†
提出了一种固体进样石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定高纯碳化硼(B4C)中金属杂质的方法。为B4C样品中Al、Cr、Cu、Mn和Ni的测定提供了较大的工作范围,评价了采用变磁场(VMF)工作的zeman效应背景校正系统的可行性。评估了以下参数:热解和雾化温度,样品质量,以及Al和Mn的替代波长的使用。作为一项重要成果,使用标准水溶液进行校准是可行的,而不需要化学改性剂。然而,使用石墨粉覆盖样品平台可以避免石墨平台热解层的破坏。SS-GFAAS法测定金属杂质的工作范围为0.01 ~ 1500 μg−1。样品质量≤2.5 mg,检出限为0.003 ~ 1 μg−1,RSD < 17%。采用B4C认证标准物质(BAM/ERM-ED 102),并将微波辅助湿消解和碱性熔融所得结果与随后电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法(ICP-OES)测定结果进行比较,对准确度进行了评估。两种消化方法经SS-GFAAS测定结果与ICP-OES测定结果均无差异(t检验,95%置信水平)。此外,结果与认证标准物质的值没有显着差异。所建立的SS-GFAAS方法可对B4C中Al、Cr、Cu、Mn和Ni的测定进行质量控制,工作范围大,检出限低于文献报道的其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
26.50%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Innovative research on the fundamental theory and application of spectrometric techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信