Boas and the metaphysics of race in the biological race debate

IF 1.8 2区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Yotam Harel
{"title":"Boas and the metaphysics of race in the biological race debate","authors":"Yotam Harel","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Franz Boas is widely regarded as a revolutionary anthropologist, maybe even the “founding grandfather” of modern anthropology. In this paper, I examine whether, besides his scientifically pioneering work in anthropology, Boas was also a pioneer with respect to the metaphysics of race. I argue that while Boas reconstructs a biological realistic (deterministic) position about race as the popular position about race he argues with, Boas’ own position about race is best understood as anti-realism. Hence, I state that Boas accepts the biological (deterministic) meaning of race but seems to hold that given this meaning, human races are not real. I thus suggest that Boas may be taken to have led an ontological turn in the metaphysics of race rather than a semantical one, holding that human races do not exist. Boas, then, seems to be a pioneer in holding that races are not real, and his novel scientific evidence regarding so-called human races enabled him to develop his anti-realist position about race. However, I also argue that in contrast to the great influence of Boas’ scientific revolutionariness, surprisingly, his ontological turn has been almost completely unnoticed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039368125000998","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Franz Boas is widely regarded as a revolutionary anthropologist, maybe even the “founding grandfather” of modern anthropology. In this paper, I examine whether, besides his scientifically pioneering work in anthropology, Boas was also a pioneer with respect to the metaphysics of race. I argue that while Boas reconstructs a biological realistic (deterministic) position about race as the popular position about race he argues with, Boas’ own position about race is best understood as anti-realism. Hence, I state that Boas accepts the biological (deterministic) meaning of race but seems to hold that given this meaning, human races are not real. I thus suggest that Boas may be taken to have led an ontological turn in the metaphysics of race rather than a semantical one, holding that human races do not exist. Boas, then, seems to be a pioneer in holding that races are not real, and his novel scientific evidence regarding so-called human races enabled him to develop his anti-realist position about race. However, I also argue that in contrast to the great influence of Boas’ scientific revolutionariness, surprisingly, his ontological turn has been almost completely unnoticed.
鲍亚士与生物种族辩论中的种族形而上学
博厄斯被广泛认为是一位革命性的人类学家,甚至可能是现代人类学的“奠基人”。在本文中,我将检视鲍亚士除了在人类学方面的科学开创性工作外,是否也是种族形而上学方面的先驱。我认为,虽然鲍亚士重建了一个关于种族的生物现实主义(决定论)立场,作为他所争论的关于种族的流行立场,但鲍亚士自己关于种族的立场最好被理解为反现实主义。因此,我声明鲍亚士接受种族的生物学(决定论)意义,但似乎认为,鉴于这个意义,人类种族不是真实的。因此,我认为鲍亚士可能被认为在种族的形而上学中引领了本体论的转向,而不是语义学的转向,认为人类种族不存在。因此,鲍亚士似乎是主张种族不真实的先驱,而他关于所谓人类种族的新颖科学证据,使他得以发展他关于种族的反实在论立场。然而,我也认为,与鲍亚士的科学革命的巨大影响相比,令人惊讶的是,他的本体论转向几乎完全被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science is devoted to the integrated study of the history, philosophy and sociology of the sciences. The editors encourage contributions both in the long-established areas of the history of the sciences and the philosophy of the sciences and in the topical areas of historiography of the sciences, the sciences in relation to gender, culture and society and the sciences in relation to arts. The Journal is international in scope and content and publishes papers from a wide range of countries and cultural traditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信