Efficacy and safety of perampanel in critically ill pediatric patients with refractory and super‐refractory status epilepticus: a retrospective study from a Chinese tertiary medical center

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Rui Qu , Anmin Han , Lingjian Meng , Xiangju Qu , Yali Zhu , Yuanyuan Dai
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of perampanel in critically ill pediatric patients with refractory and super‐refractory status epilepticus: a retrospective study from a Chinese tertiary medical center","authors":"Rui Qu ,&nbsp;Anmin Han ,&nbsp;Lingjian Meng ,&nbsp;Xiangju Qu ,&nbsp;Yali Zhu ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurological emergency in critically ill children. Limited data exist regarding the use of perampanel for benzodiazepine-resistant SE in this population. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of perampanel in Chinese critically ill children and adolescents with SE.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational study was conducted from March 2020 to March 2025 at a tertiary hospital in China. Efficacy was defined as seizure cessation within 72 h of perampanel administration, confirmed by clinical and continuous video electroencephalograph monitoring. Adverse effects were defined using predefined criteria, primarily within 7 days post-administration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 237 pediatric patients identified as experiencing SE, 32 (13.5 %) received perampanel, including 15 females with median age 12.0 years (range, 4.3–17.0 years; IQR, 8.8–16.0 years). The overall response rate was 40.6 %, highest in the focal motor SE group (8/12, 66.7 %) compared to the generalized tonic-clonic seizures (3/10, 30.0 %) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus groups (2/10, 20.0 %). Non-responders had a higher maximal perampanel dose compared to responders. Among responders, those receiving concomitant midazolam required a lower dose versus those without midazolam. No significant liver enzyme elevation was noted pre- and post- perampanel administration.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Our data support the efficacy of perampanel in treating refractory-SE and super-refractory SE in critically ill pediatric patients and variability in treatment response based on the different subtypes of SE. Combination therapy with midazolam might reduce the perampanel dose required to achieve seizure cessation. However, further studies are warranted in a larger patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 110655"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025003956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurological emergency in critically ill children. Limited data exist regarding the use of perampanel for benzodiazepine-resistant SE in this population. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of perampanel in Chinese critically ill children and adolescents with SE.

Methods

This retrospective observational study was conducted from March 2020 to March 2025 at a tertiary hospital in China. Efficacy was defined as seizure cessation within 72 h of perampanel administration, confirmed by clinical and continuous video electroencephalograph monitoring. Adverse effects were defined using predefined criteria, primarily within 7 days post-administration.

Results

Of 237 pediatric patients identified as experiencing SE, 32 (13.5 %) received perampanel, including 15 females with median age 12.0 years (range, 4.3–17.0 years; IQR, 8.8–16.0 years). The overall response rate was 40.6 %, highest in the focal motor SE group (8/12, 66.7 %) compared to the generalized tonic-clonic seizures (3/10, 30.0 %) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus groups (2/10, 20.0 %). Non-responders had a higher maximal perampanel dose compared to responders. Among responders, those receiving concomitant midazolam required a lower dose versus those without midazolam. No significant liver enzyme elevation was noted pre- and post- perampanel administration.

Significance

Our data support the efficacy of perampanel in treating refractory-SE and super-refractory SE in critically ill pediatric patients and variability in treatment response based on the different subtypes of SE. Combination therapy with midazolam might reduce the perampanel dose required to achieve seizure cessation. However, further studies are warranted in a larger patient population.
perampanel治疗难治性和超难治性癫痫持续状态患儿的疗效和安全性:一项来自中国三级医疗中心的回顾性研究
目的癫痫持续状态(SE)是危及危重儿童生命的神经系统急症。关于在该人群中使用perampanel治疗苯二氮卓类耐药SE的数据有限。本研究旨在评价perampanel治疗中国危重症儿童和青少年SE的有效性和安全性。方法回顾性观察研究于2020年3月至2025年3月在中国某三级医院进行。疗效定义为服用perampanel后72小时内癫痫停止,经临床和连续视频脑电图监测证实。不良反应主要在给药后7天内根据预先确定的标准进行定义。结果237例确诊为SE的儿童患者中,32例(13.5%)接受了perampanel治疗,其中15例为女性,中位年龄12.0岁(范围4.3-17.0岁;IQR为8.8-16.0岁)。总有效率为40.6%,与全身性强直-阵挛发作组(3/10,30.0%)和非惊厥性癫痫持续状态组(2/10,20.0%)相比,局灶性运动SE组最高(8/12,66.7%)。与应答者相比,无应答者的最大perampanel剂量更高。在应答者中,同时服用咪达唑仑的患者比不服用咪达唑仑的患者需要更低的剂量。给药前后肝酶均未见明显升高。我们的数据支持perampanel在治疗难治性SE和超难治性SE的危重儿科患者中的疗效,以及基于不同SE亚型的治疗反应的差异性。与咪达唑仑联合治疗可能会减少实现癫痫停止所需的perampanel剂量。然而,进一步的研究需要在更大的患者群体中进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信