Integrative strategies for urban flood resilience and risk: A meta-analysis of policy, infrastructural, and ecosystem-based interventions

Abstract

Urban flooding, intensified by climate change and rapid urbanization, demands robust and operationally effective resilience strategies. However, empirical evidence on the comparative effectiveness of such strategies remains limited. This study presents the first meta-analytic synthesis evaluating urban flood resilience interventions across institutional, infrastructural, and socio-ecological domains. By synthesizing data from 29 peer-reviewed studies (2000–2024), this study applies standardized effect sizes (Cohen's d) and meta-regression models to assess the effectiveness of different strategies. Results reveal a substantial overall effect (pooled d = 2.96, 95 % CI: [1.92, 3.99]) with high heterogeneity (I² = 93.8 %). Institutional mechanisms, such as policy coordination, regulatory frameworks, and risk governance, consistently show the strongest and most statistically significant impacts (d ≈ 2.96). Low Impact Development (LID) demonstrates limited, non-significant effects (d ≈ 0.08). The study introduces a novel hierarchical resilience framework spanning different dimensions and establishes an evidence-based typology of urban flood resilience strategies. These findings highlight the importance of integrated, multi-level governance and context-specific planning in enhancing urban flood resilience. The study findings provides critical insights for implementing resilience strategies in flood-prone urban areas, and support the formulation of adaptive and sustainable urban policies.