Konstantinos N. Panagiotopoulos , Nikos Tsiknakis , Dimitrios I. Zaridis , Athanasios G. Tzioufas , Dimitrios I. Fotiadis , Andreas V. Goules
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for biopsies and imaging modalities in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: An instructive narrative review","authors":"Konstantinos N. Panagiotopoulos , Nikos Tsiknakis , Dimitrios I. Zaridis , Athanasios G. Tzioufas , Dimitrios I. Fotiadis , Andreas V. Goules","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2025.103916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To organize the existing literature regarding applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in biopsies and imaging modalities of patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) and to familiarize readers with the most commonly occurring concepts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Firstly, we present a workflow that summarizes techniques implemented in AI for biopsies and imaging modalities in SARDs. Next, we describe challenges specific to image analysis for medicine. Subsequently, we describe the goals for an AI study in this field, and the prerequisites to meet them in SARDs. Finally, after reviewing the existing literature, we present the applications of AI for image analysis in each SARD. Accordingly, we analyze 1–2 studies from each SARD and mention key messages and lessons derived from them. Lastly, we create a recommendation landscape identifying unmet needs for AI applications in each SARD. The vast majority of studies employ supervised learning for image classification or segmentation, and rarely for regression. The median dataset size was 116 patients for imaging studies and 271 patients for biopsies studies, while the number of images per study varied greatly. Reporting of multiple performance metrics was frequently neglected.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Employing AI for SARD image analysis ultimately demands large datasets with multimodal and adequately diverse data to effectively capture the heterogeneity of SARDs. In the field of rheumatology, plagued by subjectivity and interobserver variability, issues regarding data quality, regulatory authorities and the specificity and clinical impact of questions posed will define the time needed for clinical adoption of AI-assisted medical care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"24 12","pages":"Article 103916"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997225001776","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To organize the existing literature regarding applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in biopsies and imaging modalities of patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) and to familiarize readers with the most commonly occurring concepts.
Results
Firstly, we present a workflow that summarizes techniques implemented in AI for biopsies and imaging modalities in SARDs. Next, we describe challenges specific to image analysis for medicine. Subsequently, we describe the goals for an AI study in this field, and the prerequisites to meet them in SARDs. Finally, after reviewing the existing literature, we present the applications of AI for image analysis in each SARD. Accordingly, we analyze 1–2 studies from each SARD and mention key messages and lessons derived from them. Lastly, we create a recommendation landscape identifying unmet needs for AI applications in each SARD. The vast majority of studies employ supervised learning for image classification or segmentation, and rarely for regression. The median dataset size was 116 patients for imaging studies and 271 patients for biopsies studies, while the number of images per study varied greatly. Reporting of multiple performance metrics was frequently neglected.
Conclusions
Employing AI for SARD image analysis ultimately demands large datasets with multimodal and adequately diverse data to effectively capture the heterogeneity of SARDs. In the field of rheumatology, plagued by subjectivity and interobserver variability, issues regarding data quality, regulatory authorities and the specificity and clinical impact of questions posed will define the time needed for clinical adoption of AI-assisted medical care.
期刊介绍:
Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers.
The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences.
In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations.
Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.