Outcomes of surgically and non-surgically managed temporal encephalocoeles in the context of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: A retrospective single-centre case series
Anca-Mihaela Vasilica , Jasneet Kaur Dhaliwal , Debayan Dasgupta , Aswin Chari , Sachit Shah , Dermot Mallon , Jane de Tisi , Anna Miserocchi , Andrew W. McEvoy , John S. Duncan
{"title":"Outcomes of surgically and non-surgically managed temporal encephalocoeles in the context of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: A retrospective single-centre case series","authors":"Anca-Mihaela Vasilica , Jasneet Kaur Dhaliwal , Debayan Dasgupta , Aswin Chari , Sachit Shah , Dermot Mallon , Jane de Tisi , Anna Miserocchi , Andrew W. McEvoy , John S. Duncan","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2025.107643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Temporal encephalocoeles are a recognised cause of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), with uncertain associations to epileptogenesis and an unclear optimal management approach. Operative management, particularly resective temporal lobe surgery, has been proposed, but outcomes and decision-making criteria remain debated. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of surgically and non-surgically managed patients with temporal encephalocoeles in the context of drug-resistant TLE, focusing on seizure freedom rates, postoperative complications and factors influencing management decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective, single-centre study was conducted based on all adult TLE patients with temporal encephalocoeles encountered between March 2017 and August 2023. Patients were classified into three groups: those discussed at an epilepsy surgery multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting and managed surgically (surgical group), those discussed at an MDT and managed non-surgically (non-surgical group) and those radiologically identified by reporting neuroradiologists but not discussed at MDT (radiologically diagnosed group). Clinical, electrophysiological, radiological and surgical data were compared across the groups, including radiological features of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) that have been postulated as a cause for temporal encephaloceles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 24 adult patients with temporal encephalocoeles: eight in the surgical group, eight in the non-surgical group and eight in the radiologically diagnosed group. The mean age at diagnosis was 39.3 ± 13.6 years and clinical features were comparable across groups. Operative management was decided by an experienced epilepsy surgery MDT, involving resection of the anterior temporal pole with (4/8, 50 %) or without (50 %) mesial temporal structures, resulted in a seizure freedom rate of 87.5 %. In contrast, no patient in the non-surgical or radiologically diagnosed groups achieved seizure freedom (0 %). Postoperative complications included one patient who developed hydrocephalus and required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and another who developed a pseudomeningocoele. Radiological markers of raised ICP were broadly similar across the groups, with the exception of increased optic nerve sheath diameter in the non-surgical group (p = 0.032).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study demonstrates that excellent post-operative outcomes are achievable with temporal lobe resections. A standardised presurgical evaluation pathway and management protocol are essential to ensure timely identification of temporal encephalocoeles on imaging, facilitating preoperative planning and optimising surgical outcomes. CSF hydrodynamic disturbances may occur after surgery for encephaloceles and individualised evaluation is therefore crucial to select the most appropriate management approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 107643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121125001445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Temporal encephalocoeles are a recognised cause of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), with uncertain associations to epileptogenesis and an unclear optimal management approach. Operative management, particularly resective temporal lobe surgery, has been proposed, but outcomes and decision-making criteria remain debated. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of surgically and non-surgically managed patients with temporal encephalocoeles in the context of drug-resistant TLE, focusing on seizure freedom rates, postoperative complications and factors influencing management decisions.
Methods
A retrospective, single-centre study was conducted based on all adult TLE patients with temporal encephalocoeles encountered between March 2017 and August 2023. Patients were classified into three groups: those discussed at an epilepsy surgery multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting and managed surgically (surgical group), those discussed at an MDT and managed non-surgically (non-surgical group) and those radiologically identified by reporting neuroradiologists but not discussed at MDT (radiologically diagnosed group). Clinical, electrophysiological, radiological and surgical data were compared across the groups, including radiological features of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) that have been postulated as a cause for temporal encephaloceles.
Results
We included 24 adult patients with temporal encephalocoeles: eight in the surgical group, eight in the non-surgical group and eight in the radiologically diagnosed group. The mean age at diagnosis was 39.3 ± 13.6 years and clinical features were comparable across groups. Operative management was decided by an experienced epilepsy surgery MDT, involving resection of the anterior temporal pole with (4/8, 50 %) or without (50 %) mesial temporal structures, resulted in a seizure freedom rate of 87.5 %. In contrast, no patient in the non-surgical or radiologically diagnosed groups achieved seizure freedom (0 %). Postoperative complications included one patient who developed hydrocephalus and required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and another who developed a pseudomeningocoele. Radiological markers of raised ICP were broadly similar across the groups, with the exception of increased optic nerve sheath diameter in the non-surgical group (p = 0.032).
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that excellent post-operative outcomes are achievable with temporal lobe resections. A standardised presurgical evaluation pathway and management protocol are essential to ensure timely identification of temporal encephalocoeles on imaging, facilitating preoperative planning and optimising surgical outcomes. CSF hydrodynamic disturbances may occur after surgery for encephaloceles and individualised evaluation is therefore crucial to select the most appropriate management approach.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.