Sabrina Rosa Rinder , Gernot Lechner , Marc Reimann , Verena Kraßnig
{"title":"(Re)Use it or not: Operational disposition decisions depending on product and organization type","authors":"Sabrina Rosa Rinder , Gernot Lechner , Marc Reimann , Verena Kraßnig","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The efficiency of the circular economy depends on <em>how</em> used products remain in the cycle. For each used product, a specific recovery strategy must be selected through operational disposition decisions. Despite their significance, little is known about how organizations make these decisions. Existing research emphasizes strategic-tactical perspectives and focuses on electronics. This study explores how reuse organizations make operational disposition decisions using a mixed-methods design, incorporating semi-structured interviews and survey data. We address key gaps by (1) analyzing the operational dimension of disposition, (2) including multiple product types, and (3) comparing for-profit and non-profit organizations. Our analysis identifies 14 decision factors, with three consistently important across product types: the amount and type of defects, used materials and processing quality, and demand. Notably, we observe significant differences across product and organizational types. Our findings enhance understanding of operational decision-making, inform decision-support tools, and contribute to more efficient resource utilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 108541"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004185","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The efficiency of the circular economy depends on how used products remain in the cycle. For each used product, a specific recovery strategy must be selected through operational disposition decisions. Despite their significance, little is known about how organizations make these decisions. Existing research emphasizes strategic-tactical perspectives and focuses on electronics. This study explores how reuse organizations make operational disposition decisions using a mixed-methods design, incorporating semi-structured interviews and survey data. We address key gaps by (1) analyzing the operational dimension of disposition, (2) including multiple product types, and (3) comparing for-profit and non-profit organizations. Our analysis identifies 14 decision factors, with three consistently important across product types: the amount and type of defects, used materials and processing quality, and demand. Notably, we observe significant differences across product and organizational types. Our findings enhance understanding of operational decision-making, inform decision-support tools, and contribute to more efficient resource utilization.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.