Simulation of bubbly flow in loop reactors using the Eulerian-Eulerian two-fluid method: Analysis and assessment of medium-to-high liquid flow rate effect

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
M. Badalan , M. Shiea , Y. Haroun , G.E. Vázquez-Angulo , J.E.V. Guzmán
{"title":"Simulation of bubbly flow in loop reactors using the Eulerian-Eulerian two-fluid method: Analysis and assessment of medium-to-high liquid flow rate effect","authors":"M. Badalan ,&nbsp;M. Shiea ,&nbsp;Y. Haroun ,&nbsp;G.E. Vázquez-Angulo ,&nbsp;J.E.V. Guzmán","doi":"10.1016/j.cherd.2025.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loop reactors in the chemical industry are characterised by gas–liquid flow in a vertical arrangement, including a riser and a downcomer, at relatively high liquid velocities. A standard method in the industry for simulating such flows in large geometries is the Eulerian two-fluid model, which relies on interfacial forces to describe the interactions (momentum transfer) between the two phases. However, most of these models have been validated with data from bubble columns and low-velocity pipe flows. Therefore, we assess the accuracy of these models against experimental data from medium-to-high velocity (upward and downward) bubbly flows in pipes. The OpenFOAM simulation framework is used for this purpose. For upward flows, current models fail to predict the shift of the void fraction peak towards the centre of the pipe at high liquid velocities. This work discusses several development directions, including adjustments to the lift and wall lubrication coefficients, which significantly improve prediction accuracy. For downward flows, the void fraction distribution is highly dependent on inlet conditions, which aligns with previous results from the literature. This study highlights the mispredictions of conventional models and provides valuable insights into optimising interfacial force models for more accurate simulations in chemical loop reactors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10019,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","volume":"221 ","pages":"Pages 497-511"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876225004113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loop reactors in the chemical industry are characterised by gas–liquid flow in a vertical arrangement, including a riser and a downcomer, at relatively high liquid velocities. A standard method in the industry for simulating such flows in large geometries is the Eulerian two-fluid model, which relies on interfacial forces to describe the interactions (momentum transfer) between the two phases. However, most of these models have been validated with data from bubble columns and low-velocity pipe flows. Therefore, we assess the accuracy of these models against experimental data from medium-to-high velocity (upward and downward) bubbly flows in pipes. The OpenFOAM simulation framework is used for this purpose. For upward flows, current models fail to predict the shift of the void fraction peak towards the centre of the pipe at high liquid velocities. This work discusses several development directions, including adjustments to the lift and wall lubrication coefficients, which significantly improve prediction accuracy. For downward flows, the void fraction distribution is highly dependent on inlet conditions, which aligns with previous results from the literature. This study highlights the mispredictions of conventional models and provides valuable insights into optimising interfacial force models for more accurate simulations in chemical loop reactors.

Abstract Image

用欧拉-欧拉双流体法模拟环形反应器中的气泡流动:中高流速效应的分析与评价
化学工业中的环形反应器的特点是气液垂直流动,包括一个提升管和一个下行管,液体流速相对较高。行业中模拟大型几何流体流动的标准方法是欧拉双流体模型,该模型依赖于界面力来描述两相之间的相互作用(动量传递)。然而,这些模型中的大多数已经用气泡柱和低速管流的数据进行了验证。因此,我们根据管道中高速(向上和向下)气泡流的实验数据来评估这些模型的准确性。OpenFOAM仿真框架用于此目的。对于向上流动,目前的模型无法预测在高液体速度下空隙率峰值向管道中心的移动。本文讨论了几个发展方向,包括调整升力和壁面润滑系数,这大大提高了预测精度。对于向下流动,空隙率分布高度依赖于进口条件,这与先前文献的结果一致。这项研究强调了传统模型的错误预测,并为优化界面力模型提供了有价值的见解,以便在化学环反应器中进行更准确的模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical Engineering Research & Design
Chemical Engineering Research & Design 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
623
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: ChERD aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in chemical engineering. Papers showing how research results can be used in chemical engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in plant or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of traditional chemical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信