Evaluation of facial asymmetry and cervical spine deviation: A retrospective study

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Karen Gomi, Akinori Moroi, Riku Kohara, Sumire Ono, Kunio Yoshizawa, Koichiro Ueki
{"title":"Evaluation of facial asymmetry and cervical spine deviation: A retrospective study","authors":"Karen Gomi,&nbsp;Akinori Moroi,&nbsp;Riku Kohara,&nbsp;Sumire Ono,&nbsp;Kunio Yoshizawa,&nbsp;Koichiro Ueki","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoms.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Facial asymmetry may be associated with cervical spine deviation; however, a relationship has not yet been established. This study aimed to clarify an association between facial asymmetry and cervical spine deviation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We evaluated facial asymmetry and measured cervical spine angles to determine their effects on cervical deviation in 92 female patients with jaw deformities that were assessed using computed tomography (CT). Frontal, lateral, and axial radiographs were analyzed using cephalometry. We measured distances and angles from the external occipital protuberance to reference points on an atlas and up to the fifth cervical spine. Maxillofacial morphology was constructed in three dimensions from CT images. The primary outcome measure was the cervical spine angle in association with the maxillomandibular (Mx-Md) midline angle.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cervical spine angle significantly and positively correlated with the Mx-Md midline angle (p &lt; 0.001). Patients with Mx-Md midline angles &gt; 2.5° or ≤ 2.5° were respectively classified as asymmetric (n = 43) and symmetric (n = 49). The average cervical spine angles were 11.21° ± 7.23° in the asymmetric group and 7.53° ± 6.05° in the symmetric group. The cervical spine angle significantly differed between the symmetric and asymmetric groups, with larger cervical spine angles corresponding to increased facial asymmetry (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study identified an association between cervical spine deviation and facial symmetry, which may play a role in postural distortion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology","volume":"37 6","pages":"Pages 1220-1225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212555825001358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Facial asymmetry may be associated with cervical spine deviation; however, a relationship has not yet been established. This study aimed to clarify an association between facial asymmetry and cervical spine deviation.

Methods

We evaluated facial asymmetry and measured cervical spine angles to determine their effects on cervical deviation in 92 female patients with jaw deformities that were assessed using computed tomography (CT). Frontal, lateral, and axial radiographs were analyzed using cephalometry. We measured distances and angles from the external occipital protuberance to reference points on an atlas and up to the fifth cervical spine. Maxillofacial morphology was constructed in three dimensions from CT images. The primary outcome measure was the cervical spine angle in association with the maxillomandibular (Mx-Md) midline angle.

Results

The cervical spine angle significantly and positively correlated with the Mx-Md midline angle (p < 0.001). Patients with Mx-Md midline angles > 2.5° or ≤ 2.5° were respectively classified as asymmetric (n = 43) and symmetric (n = 49). The average cervical spine angles were 11.21° ± 7.23° in the asymmetric group and 7.53° ± 6.05° in the symmetric group. The cervical spine angle significantly differed between the symmetric and asymmetric groups, with larger cervical spine angles corresponding to increased facial asymmetry (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study identified an association between cervical spine deviation and facial symmetry, which may play a role in postural distortion.
评估面部不对称和颈椎偏差:一项回顾性研究
目的:面部不对称可能与颈椎偏曲有关;然而,这种关系尚未建立。本研究旨在阐明面部不对称与颈椎偏曲之间的关系。方法对92例女性颌骨畸形患者进行面部不对称评估,并测量颈椎角度,以确定其对颈椎偏位的影响。采用头颅测量术分析正位片、侧位片和轴位片。我们测量了从枕外隆突到寰椎参考点到第五颈椎的距离和角度。利用CT图像构建三维颌面部形态。主要结局指标是颈椎角与上颌骨中线角(Mx-Md)的关系。结果颈椎角与Mx-Md中线角呈显著正相关(p <; 0.001)。将Mx-Md中线角度为>; 2.5°或≤ 2.5°的患者分为不对称组(n = 43)和对称组(n = 49)。不对称组平均颈椎角为11.21°±7.23°,对称组平均颈椎角为7.53°±6.05°。对称组和不对称组的颈椎角度差异显著,颈椎角度越大,面部不对称程度越高(p <; 0.001)。结论本研究确定了颈椎偏曲和面部对称之间的关联,这可能在姿势扭曲中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信