Assessing resilience potentials in management of occupational safety and health in hospitals: Development and validation of a tool

IF 3.4 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
J. Afonso-Fernandes , J. Barbosa , P. Arezes , C. Pardo-Ferreira , J.C. Rubio-Romero , M.A. Rodrigues
{"title":"Assessing resilience potentials in management of occupational safety and health in hospitals: Development and validation of a tool","authors":"J. Afonso-Fernandes ,&nbsp;J. Barbosa ,&nbsp;P. Arezes ,&nbsp;C. Pardo-Ferreira ,&nbsp;J.C. Rubio-Romero ,&nbsp;M.A. Rodrigues","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2025.100247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A resilient Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) management system is crucial for effectively addressing potential future public emergencies, ensuring the continuous protection of workers' safety and health. Therefore, it is essential for organizations, particularly hospitals, to assess their resilient performance and employ tools that are appropriate and tailored to their specific context. This study aims to enhance the understanding of resilience potentials in OSH management within hospital settings. To this end, an assessment tool was developed based on the Resilience Assessment Grid (RAG). A Delphi study involving subject matter experts was conducted to refine the tailored RAG tool. Following this, a pilot test was administered to 404 healthcare professionals across three public hospitals, with subsequent psychometric analysis. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) identified a four-dimensional structure. Goodness-of-fit indices demonstrated acceptable values, confirming the adequacy of the measurement model. Reliability testing indicated that the 29 item assessment tool is both valid and reliable. The tailored RAG tool was successfully validated, enabling the identification of strengths and weaknesses in OSH management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449625000817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A resilient Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) management system is crucial for effectively addressing potential future public emergencies, ensuring the continuous protection of workers' safety and health. Therefore, it is essential for organizations, particularly hospitals, to assess their resilient performance and employ tools that are appropriate and tailored to their specific context. This study aims to enhance the understanding of resilience potentials in OSH management within hospital settings. To this end, an assessment tool was developed based on the Resilience Assessment Grid (RAG). A Delphi study involving subject matter experts was conducted to refine the tailored RAG tool. Following this, a pilot test was administered to 404 healthcare professionals across three public hospitals, with subsequent psychometric analysis. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) identified a four-dimensional structure. Goodness-of-fit indices demonstrated acceptable values, confirming the adequacy of the measurement model. Reliability testing indicated that the 29 item assessment tool is both valid and reliable. The tailored RAG tool was successfully validated, enabling the identification of strengths and weaknesses in OSH management.
评估医院职业安全和健康管理的复原力潜力:开发和验证一种工具
一个有弹性的职业安全与健康管理体系对于有效应对未来潜在的公共突发事件,确保持续保护工人的安全和健康至关重要。因此,各组织,特别是医院,必须评估其弹性绩效,并采用适合其具体情况的工具。本研究旨在增进对医院环境中职业安全卫生管理弹性潜力的了解。为此,开发了一种基于弹性评估网格(RAG)的评估工具。进行了涉及主题专家的德尔菲研究,以完善定制的RAG工具。在此之后,对三家公立医院的404名医疗保健专业人员进行了试点测试,随后进行了心理测量分析。探索性因子分析(EFA)确定了一个四维结构。拟合优度指数显示了可接受的值,证实了测量模型的充分性。信度检验表明,29项评价工具有效可靠。量身定制的RAG工具已成功验证,能够识别职业安全与健康管理中的优势和劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信