Correlations between resistivity and seismic velocities depending on physical properties of different grain size soils

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nevbahar Ekin
{"title":"Correlations between resistivity and seismic velocities depending on physical properties of different grain size soils","authors":"Nevbahar Ekin","doi":"10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Parameters obtained from geophysical methods depending on the physical features of the soil are differently affected. Therefore, one method may be preferable according to the other. In literature, relationships have existed between parameters obtained from shallow seismic refraction and direct current resistivity methods. Using these relationships are provided to each other transformations of the geotechnical parameters. However, only one soil type or only P wave velocity was used in these relationships. Besides, it seems that the saturation type (liquid or gas) of the soil is not taken into account in these relationships.</div><div>In this study, relationships between seismic compressional and shear wave velocities (Vp, Vs) and resistivity (R) were developed by taking into account the soil type and the saturation type of the soil. The data used in these relationships were classified according to the type of soil (clay+silt, sand, or gravel) and whether the soil was wet or dry. Relationships between P and S wave velocities and resistivity values based on the classified data were investigated. Accordingly, new empirical relationships were determined to estimate the P and S wave velocities from resistivity values with RMSE of 0.22 km/s and 0.06 km/s, respectively. In these relationships, the resistivity limit values (R<sub>limit</sub>) between wet and dry data were found to be 18.5 Ω.m, 57.5 Ω.m, and 99.5 Ω.m for silt + clay, sand, and gravel soils respectively. The degrees of saturation (Sr) of the clay+silt, sand, and gravel soil were estimated by using the seismic velocities obtained from these relationships and field studies. The obtained results were compared and RMSE were obtained as 0.17, 0.16, and 0.16 for clay+silt, sand, and gravel soil, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 105910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926985125002915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parameters obtained from geophysical methods depending on the physical features of the soil are differently affected. Therefore, one method may be preferable according to the other. In literature, relationships have existed between parameters obtained from shallow seismic refraction and direct current resistivity methods. Using these relationships are provided to each other transformations of the geotechnical parameters. However, only one soil type or only P wave velocity was used in these relationships. Besides, it seems that the saturation type (liquid or gas) of the soil is not taken into account in these relationships.
In this study, relationships between seismic compressional and shear wave velocities (Vp, Vs) and resistivity (R) were developed by taking into account the soil type and the saturation type of the soil. The data used in these relationships were classified according to the type of soil (clay+silt, sand, or gravel) and whether the soil was wet or dry. Relationships between P and S wave velocities and resistivity values based on the classified data were investigated. Accordingly, new empirical relationships were determined to estimate the P and S wave velocities from resistivity values with RMSE of 0.22 km/s and 0.06 km/s, respectively. In these relationships, the resistivity limit values (Rlimit) between wet and dry data were found to be 18.5 Ω.m, 57.5 Ω.m, and 99.5 Ω.m for silt + clay, sand, and gravel soils respectively. The degrees of saturation (Sr) of the clay+silt, sand, and gravel soil were estimated by using the seismic velocities obtained from these relationships and field studies. The obtained results were compared and RMSE were obtained as 0.17, 0.16, and 0.16 for clay+silt, sand, and gravel soil, respectively.
电阻率与地震速度之间的相关性取决于不同粒度土壤的物理性质
根据土壤的物理特征,地球物理方法获得的参数受到不同的影响。因此,根据另一种方法,一种方法可能是优选的。在文献中,浅层地震折射得到的参数与直流电阻率法之间存在关系。利用这些关系提供了相互转换的岩土参数。然而,在这些关系中只使用一种土壤类型或只使用P波速。此外,在这些关系中似乎没有考虑到土壤的饱和类型(液体或气体)。考虑土壤类型和饱和类型,建立了地震纵波速度和地震横波速度(Vp, Vs)与电阻率(R)的关系。这些关系中使用的数据根据土壤类型(粘土+淤泥,沙子或砾石)以及土壤是湿的还是干的进行分类。根据分类资料,研究了纵、横波速度与电阻率值的关系。据此,建立了新的经验关系,利用RMSE分别为0.22 km/ S和0.06 km/ S的电阻率值估算纵、横波速度。在这些关系中,粉土+粘土、砂土和砾石土的电阻率极限值(Rlimit)分别为18.5 Ω.m、57.5 Ω.m和99.5 Ω.m。利用这些关系和现场研究得到的地震速度,估计了粘土+粉土、砂土和砾石土的饱和度(Sr)。将所得结果进行比较,得到粘土+粉土、砂土和砾石土的RMSE分别为0.17、0.16和0.16。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geophysics
Journal of Applied Geophysics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Geophysics with its key objective of responding to pertinent and timely needs, places particular emphasis on methodological developments and innovative applications of geophysical techniques for addressing environmental, engineering, and hydrological problems. Related topical research in exploration geophysics and in soil and rock physics is also covered by the Journal of Applied Geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信