Mapping Skid Trails and Evaluating Soil Disturbance From UAV‐Based LiDAR Surveys in Mediterranean Forests

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Francesco Latterini, Marcin K. Dyderski, Rodolfo Picchio, Rachele Venanzi, Raffaele Spinelli, Natascia Magagnotti, Janine Schweier, Sunni Kanta Prasad Kushwaha, Nicolò Camarretta, Michael S. Watt
{"title":"Mapping Skid Trails and Evaluating Soil Disturbance From UAV‐Based LiDAR Surveys in Mediterranean Forests","authors":"Francesco Latterini, Marcin K. Dyderski, Rodolfo Picchio, Rachele Venanzi, Raffaele Spinelli, Natascia Magagnotti, Janine Schweier, Sunni Kanta Prasad Kushwaha, Nicolò Camarretta, Michael S. Watt","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil disturbance resulting from forest harvesting activities can have significant and lasting environmental consequences, particularly in sensitive ecosystems such as Mediterranean forests. Skid trails, the routes used by machinery to extract timber, are among the most critical areas of impact, and their detection is critical for assessing post‐harvest impacts and informing future planning. Traditional ground‐based methods for detecting these trails are often labor‐intensive and inefficient. This study evaluates the potential of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)‐based Laser Scanning (ULS) surveys for the accurate detection of skid trails across five Mediterranean forest sites subjected to different silvicultural treatments. Four analytical techniques were tested: Hillshading (Hill), Local Relief Model (LRM), Relative Density Model (RDM), and the machine learning‐based SkidRoad_Finder (SRF). Accuracy was assessed using a ground‐truth dataset obtained through Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) field mapping. Of the tested techniques, RDM performed best overall, achieving approximately 73% accuracy, 66% sensitivity, and a Cohen's kappa value of 0.50. LRM performed best in even‐aged beech forests, due to its ability to capture microtopographic changes. In contrast, SRF consistently underperformed, likely due to its reliance on training data not representative of the Mediterranean context. Our findings highlight that former skid trails and related soil disturbance can be effectively detected using ULS data. However, the accuracy and reliability of detection vary depending on site‐specific factors such as forest type, vegetation structure, and terrain complexity. Overall, this study underscores the utility of ULS for operational forest monitoring and supports the tailored selection of detection techniques based on local stand characteristics and available computing resources.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil disturbance resulting from forest harvesting activities can have significant and lasting environmental consequences, particularly in sensitive ecosystems such as Mediterranean forests. Skid trails, the routes used by machinery to extract timber, are among the most critical areas of impact, and their detection is critical for assessing post‐harvest impacts and informing future planning. Traditional ground‐based methods for detecting these trails are often labor‐intensive and inefficient. This study evaluates the potential of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)‐based Laser Scanning (ULS) surveys for the accurate detection of skid trails across five Mediterranean forest sites subjected to different silvicultural treatments. Four analytical techniques were tested: Hillshading (Hill), Local Relief Model (LRM), Relative Density Model (RDM), and the machine learning‐based SkidRoad_Finder (SRF). Accuracy was assessed using a ground‐truth dataset obtained through Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) field mapping. Of the tested techniques, RDM performed best overall, achieving approximately 73% accuracy, 66% sensitivity, and a Cohen's kappa value of 0.50. LRM performed best in even‐aged beech forests, due to its ability to capture microtopographic changes. In contrast, SRF consistently underperformed, likely due to its reliance on training data not representative of the Mediterranean context. Our findings highlight that former skid trails and related soil disturbance can be effectively detected using ULS data. However, the accuracy and reliability of detection vary depending on site‐specific factors such as forest type, vegetation structure, and terrain complexity. Overall, this study underscores the utility of ULS for operational forest monitoring and supports the tailored selection of detection techniques based on local stand characteristics and available computing resources.
基于无人机的地中海森林激光雷达测绘滑轨和评估土壤扰动
森林采伐活动造成的土壤扰动可产生重大和持久的环境后果,特别是在地中海森林等敏感生态系统中。滑轨,即机械提取木材的路线,是最关键的影响区域之一,它们的检测对于评估采伐后的影响和为未来规划提供信息至关重要。传统的地面探测方法往往是劳动密集型和低效的。本研究评估了基于无人机(UAV)的激光扫描(ULS)调查在五个地中海森林遗址遭受不同造林处理时精确检测滑轨的潜力。测试了四种分析技术:Hillshading (Hill)、Local Relief Model (LRM)、Relative Density Model (RDM)和基于机器学习的SkidRoad_Finder (SRF)。使用通过全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)现场测绘获得的地面真实数据集来评估准确性。在测试的技术中,RDM总体上表现最好,达到了大约73%的准确度,66%的灵敏度,Cohen的kappa值为0.50。LRM在年龄均匀的山毛榉林中表现最好,因为它能够捕捉微观地形变化。相比之下,SRF一直表现不佳,可能是由于它依赖的训练数据不代表地中海背景。我们的研究结果强调,利用ULS数据可以有效地检测到以前的滑痕和相关的土壤扰动。然而,检测的准确性和可靠性取决于特定地点的因素,如森林类型、植被结构和地形复杂性。总体而言,本研究强调了ULS在森林业务监测中的效用,并支持基于当地林分特征和可用计算资源的定制检测技术选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信