Steve R. Zhou, Lichun Zhang, Moon Hyung Choi, Sulaiman Vesal, Adam Kinnaird, Wayne G. Brisbane, Giovanni Lughezzani, Davide Maffei, Vittorio Fasulo, Patrick Albers, Richard E. Fan, Wei Shao, Geoffrey A. Sonn, Mirabela Rusu
{"title":"ProMUS‐NET: Artificial intelligence detects more prostate cancer than urologists on micro‐ultrasonography","authors":"Steve R. Zhou, Lichun Zhang, Moon Hyung Choi, Sulaiman Vesal, Adam Kinnaird, Wayne G. Brisbane, Giovanni Lughezzani, Davide Maffei, Vittorio Fasulo, Patrick Albers, Richard E. Fan, Wei Shao, Geoffrey A. Sonn, Mirabela Rusu","doi":"10.1111/bju.16892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo improve sensitivity and inter‐reader consistency of prostate cancer localisation on micro‐ultrasonography (MUS) by developing a deep learning model for automatic cancer segmentation, and to compare model performance with that of expert urologists.Patients and MethodsWe performed an institutional review board‐approved prospective collection of MUS images from patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐ultrasonography fusion guided biopsy at a single institution. Patients underwent 14‐core systematic biopsy and additional targeted sampling of suspicious MRI lesions. Biopsy pathology and MRI information were cross‐referenced to annotate the locations of International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (GG) ≥2 clinically significant cancer on MUS images. We trained a no‐new U‐Net model – the Prostate Micro‐Ultrasound Network (ProMUS‐NET) – to localise GG ≥2 cancer on these image stacks in a fivefold cross‐validation. Performance was compared vs that of six expert urologists in a matched sub‐cohort.ResultsThe artificial intelligence (AI) model achieved an area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve of 0.92 and detected more cancers than urologists (lesion‐level sensitivity 73% vs 58%; patient‐level sensitivity 77% vs 66%). AI lesion‐level sensitivity for peripheral zone lesions was 86.2%.ConclusionsOur AI model identified prostate cancer lesions on MUS with high sensitivity and specificity. Further work is ongoing to improve margin overlap, to reduce false positives, and to perform external validation. AI‐assisted prostate cancer detection on MUS has great potential to improve biopsy diagnosis by urologists.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16892","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectivesTo improve sensitivity and inter‐reader consistency of prostate cancer localisation on micro‐ultrasonography (MUS) by developing a deep learning model for automatic cancer segmentation, and to compare model performance with that of expert urologists.Patients and MethodsWe performed an institutional review board‐approved prospective collection of MUS images from patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐ultrasonography fusion guided biopsy at a single institution. Patients underwent 14‐core systematic biopsy and additional targeted sampling of suspicious MRI lesions. Biopsy pathology and MRI information were cross‐referenced to annotate the locations of International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (GG) ≥2 clinically significant cancer on MUS images. We trained a no‐new U‐Net model – the Prostate Micro‐Ultrasound Network (ProMUS‐NET) – to localise GG ≥2 cancer on these image stacks in a fivefold cross‐validation. Performance was compared vs that of six expert urologists in a matched sub‐cohort.ResultsThe artificial intelligence (AI) model achieved an area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve of 0.92 and detected more cancers than urologists (lesion‐level sensitivity 73% vs 58%; patient‐level sensitivity 77% vs 66%). AI lesion‐level sensitivity for peripheral zone lesions was 86.2%.ConclusionsOur AI model identified prostate cancer lesions on MUS with high sensitivity and specificity. Further work is ongoing to improve margin overlap, to reduce false positives, and to perform external validation. AI‐assisted prostate cancer detection on MUS has great potential to improve biopsy diagnosis by urologists.
期刊介绍:
BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.