Prevalence, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Uropathogens in Urinary Tract Infections at a Health Facility in Kumasi, Ghana

IF 4.6 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Michael Nana Antwi-Boasiako, Frederick Ayensu, Aaron Awuah, Abdul-Hakim Mutala, Kwadwo Boampong, Kingsley Badu
{"title":"Prevalence, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Uropathogens in Urinary Tract Infections at a Health Facility in Kumasi, Ghana","authors":"Michael Nana Antwi-Boasiako,&nbsp;Frederick Ayensu,&nbsp;Aaron Awuah,&nbsp;Abdul-Hakim Mutala,&nbsp;Kwadwo Boampong,&nbsp;Kingsley Badu","doi":"10.1002/mbo3.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most prevalent infections in both men and women. The most common causative organisms are <i>Escherichia coli, Klebsiella</i> spp., and <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. UTIs are diagnosed using various diagnostic methods with urine culture as the gold standard. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of UTIs, compare the tools employed in the diagnosis of UTIs, and assess the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates among patients in a local health facility in Kumasi, Ghana. A cohort of 208 participants were enlisted for a cross-sectional study at the HopeXchange Medical Centre, Kumasi. Mid-stream urine samples were collected from participants and analyzed by culture, microscopy, and dipstick methods. Culture isolates were tested on Mueller-Hinton Agar applying the Kirby Bauer method against a range of antibiotics. The prevalence of <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. (25%) and <i>Klebsiella</i> spp. (16.7%) were higher than that of <i>Escherichia coli</i> (8.3%). UTI was more common in individuals between 50 and 59 years of age (36.5%) and mostly associated among women (76.9%). Overall, culture confirmed UTI prevalence was 23.08% while dispstick and microscopy diagnosed 44.23% and 47.60% of UTIs, respectively. Microscopy exhibited a sensitivity of 68.8% and specificity of 58.8% while the dipstick had a sensitivity of 60.4% and specificity of 60.6% compared to urine culture. Meropenem showed 100% susceptibility, while high resistance was observed for chloramphenicol and ceftriaxone against <i>Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus</i> spp<i>., Providencia</i> spp., and <i>Klebsiella</i> spp. UTI was significantly associated with age, gender, and the standard diagnostic method (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>","PeriodicalId":18573,"journal":{"name":"MicrobiologyOpen","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mbo3.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MicrobiologyOpen","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mbo3.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most prevalent infections in both men and women. The most common causative organisms are Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Staphylococcus spp. UTIs are diagnosed using various diagnostic methods with urine culture as the gold standard. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of UTIs, compare the tools employed in the diagnosis of UTIs, and assess the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates among patients in a local health facility in Kumasi, Ghana. A cohort of 208 participants were enlisted for a cross-sectional study at the HopeXchange Medical Centre, Kumasi. Mid-stream urine samples were collected from participants and analyzed by culture, microscopy, and dipstick methods. Culture isolates were tested on Mueller-Hinton Agar applying the Kirby Bauer method against a range of antibiotics. The prevalence of Staphylococcus spp. (25%) and Klebsiella spp. (16.7%) were higher than that of Escherichia coli (8.3%). UTI was more common in individuals between 50 and 59 years of age (36.5%) and mostly associated among women (76.9%). Overall, culture confirmed UTI prevalence was 23.08% while dispstick and microscopy diagnosed 44.23% and 47.60% of UTIs, respectively. Microscopy exhibited a sensitivity of 68.8% and specificity of 58.8% while the dipstick had a sensitivity of 60.4% and specificity of 60.6% compared to urine culture. Meropenem showed 100% susceptibility, while high resistance was observed for chloramphenicol and ceftriaxone against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus spp., Providencia spp., and Klebsiella spp. UTI was significantly associated with age, gender, and the standard diagnostic method (p < 0.05).

Abstract Image

加纳库马西一家卫生机构尿路感染中尿路病原体的患病率、诊断准确性和抗微生物药物耐药性模式
尿路感染(uti)是男性和女性中最普遍的感染之一。最常见的病原菌是大肠杆菌、克雷伯氏菌和葡萄球菌。尿路感染的诊断方法多种多样,以尿培养为金标准。本研究旨在估计尿路感染的患病率,比较用于诊断尿路感染的工具,并评估加纳库马西当地卫生机构患者中细菌分离株的抗生素敏感性模式。在库马西的HopeXchange医疗中心招募了208名参与者进行横断面研究。收集参与者的中游尿液样本,并通过培养、显微镜和试纸法进行分析。用Kirby Bauer法在Mueller-Hinton琼脂上测试培养分离物对一系列抗生素的抗性。葡萄球菌(25%)和克雷伯氏菌(16.7%)的感染率高于大肠杆菌(8.3%)。尿路感染在50 - 59岁的人群中更为常见(36.5%),其中女性居多(76.9%)。总体而言,培养确诊的UTI患病率为23.08%,而贴片和显微镜诊断的UTI患病率分别为44.23%和47.60%。与尿培养相比,镜检的敏感性为68.8%,特异性为58.8%,而试纸的敏感性为60.4%,特异性为60.6%。美罗培南的敏感性为100%,而氯霉素和头孢曲松对大肠埃希菌、葡萄球菌、普罗维登氏菌和克雷伯氏菌的耐药率较高。UTI与年龄、性别、标准诊断方法相关(p < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MicrobiologyOpen
MicrobiologyOpen MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: MicrobiologyOpen is a peer reviewed, fully open access, broad-scope, and interdisciplinary journal delivering rapid decisions and fast publication of microbial science, a field which is undergoing a profound and exciting evolution in this post-genomic era. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish quality research in both fundamental and applied microbiology. Our goal is to publish articles that stimulate discussion and debate, as well as add to our knowledge base and further the understanding of microbial interactions and microbial processes. MicrobiologyOpen gives prompt and equal consideration to articles reporting theoretical, experimental, applied, and descriptive work in all aspects of bacteriology, virology, mycology and protistology, including, but not limited to: - agriculture - antimicrobial resistance - astrobiology - biochemistry - biotechnology - cell and molecular biology - clinical microbiology - computational, systems, and synthetic microbiology - environmental science - evolutionary biology, ecology, and systematics - food science and technology - genetics and genomics - geobiology and earth science - host-microbe interactions - infectious diseases - natural products discovery - pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry - physiology - plant pathology - veterinary microbiology We will consider submissions across unicellular and cell-cluster organisms: prokaryotes (bacteria, archaea) and eukaryotes (fungi, protists, microalgae, lichens), as well as viruses and prions infecting or interacting with microorganisms, plants and animals, including genetic, biochemical, biophysical, bioinformatic and structural analyses. The journal features Original Articles (including full Research articles, Method articles, and Short Communications), Commentaries, Reviews, and Editorials. Original papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the article. We also support confirmatory research and aim to work with authors to meet reviewer expectations. MicrobiologyOpen publishes articles submitted directly to the journal and those referred from other Wiley journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信